Why Learn Artistic Thought? Principles of Artistic Education/ Künstlerische Bildung

¿Por qué aprender pensamiento artístico? Principios de la Educación Artística


Joachim Kettel,

Karlsruhe University of Education, Deutschland /Alemania. joachim.kettel@ph-karlsruhe.de


Sugerencias para citar este artículo:

Kettel, Joachim (2022). «Why Learn Artistic Thought? Principles of Artistic Education/ Künstlerische Bildung», Tercio Creciente, (extra6), (pp. 53-73), https://dx.doi.org/10.17561/ rtc.extra6.6539


Recibido: 11/08/2021 Revisado: 27/03/2022 Aceptado: 27/03/2022 Publicado: 01/04/2022


Abstract

My text collage looks at image productions that were individually (but also collectively) developed by my students within the concept of art education during their studies for a degree in Art Education. This is combined with the search for the semantic content of the terms “thought”, “aesthetic thought” and “artistic thought”. Where these aspects are concerned, I am interested in the question as to how artistic art education differs from other concepts. On the one hand, other concepts eliminate the mediation of art because there is apparently nothing to learn and therefore nothing to teach about art (Ehmer, 1995), but on the other hand, they legitimise the existence of art lessons in schools by reducing them to display procedures focusing on image analysis and/or the pragmatic examination of images (Bering, 2008; Niehoff, 2007) or favour the everyday aesthetic experiences of children and young people without reaching more in-depth and independent transformational processes as a result. The ultimate question that needs to be asked is what are the educational potentials and methods of art education that focuses on training artistic thought?


Keywords: Aesthetic Experience, Artistic Education, Aesthetic Thought, Artistic Thought.


Resumen

Mi texto collage analiza producciones de imágenes que fueron desarrolladas individualmente (pero también colectivamente) por mi alumnado dentro del concepto de educación artística durante sus estudios para obtener la licenciatura en Educación Artística. Esto se combina con la búsqueda del contenido semántico de los términos “pensamiento”, “pensamiento estético” y “pensamiento artístico”. En lo que respecta a estos aspectos, me interesa la cuestión de cómo la educación artística artística difiere de otros conceptos. Por un lado, otros conceptos eliminan la mediación del arte porque aparentemente no hay nada que aprender y por lo tanto nada que enseñar sobre arte (Ehmer, 1995), pero por otro lado, legitiman la existencia de lecciones de arte en las escuelas al reducir mostrarles procedimientos centrados en el análisis de imágenes (Bering, 2008; Niehoff, 2007) 1y/o el examen pragmático de imágenes o favorecer las experiencias estéticas cotidianas de niños y jóvenes sin llegar a procesos transformacionales más profundos e independientes. La última pregunta que debe plantearse es ¿cuáles son los potenciales educativos y los métodos de la educación artística que se centran en la formación del pensamiento artístico?


Palabras clave: experiencia estética, educación artística, pensamiento estético, pensamiento artístico.


Proposal

“If you don’t want to think, you’re out!” (himself) (Joseph Beuys, 1977, documenta 6 in Kassel, Germany)


My text collage looks at image productions that were individually (but also collectively) developed by my students within the concept of art education during their studies for a degree in Art Education. This is combined with the search for the semantic content of the terms “thought”, “aesthetic thought” and “artistic thought”. Where these aspects are concerned, I am interested in the question as to how artistic art education differs from other concepts. On the one hand, other concepts eliminate the mediation of art because there is apparently nothing to learn and therefore nothing to teach about art (Ehmer, 1995) but on the other hand, they legitimise the existence of art lessons in schools by reducing them to display procedures focusing on image analysis and/or the pragmatic examination of images (Bering, 2008; Niehoff, 2007) or favour the everyday aesthetic experiences of children and young people without reaching more in-depth and independent transformational processes as a result. The ultimate question that needs to be asked is what are the educational potentials and methods of art education that focuses on training artistic thought?

“If you don’t want to think, you’re out!” (himself) (Joseph Beuys, 1977, documenta 6 in Kassel, Germany)

The art educator and artist Joseph Beuys uses this claim to point out that thought contains formative powers featuring design character, that the concept of creativity is already established in the thought of every single person and that a person’s thought


can produce forms in the world. This shows that thought by no means solely extends to professional working artists, but stretches far beyond. When it comes to educational contexts, thought, feeling and wanting should all be trained. Indeed, it is only in this trinity that Beuys gives the concept its full meaning.

Beuys’ insights are, among others, also based on the possibilities that Goethe assigns to productive imagination, which, he believes, is completely absorbed in “exact sensual fantasy” and represents “utter reason”, which has to combine with sensuality, mind and imagination in order to reach its maximum level of productivity. According to Goethe, thought cannot be separated from observation. In the same way, observation is already thought that presents itself as representational thought. Goethe believes that contemplation without thought does not result in any gathering of experience “because merely looking at an item cannot advance us. Every look gives way to a consideration, every consideration gives way to a reflection and every reflection gives way to a connection, meaning that it can be said that we theorise with every single observant look at the world. Nevertheless, being able to do and deal with this with awareness, self-understanding, freedom and, to use a daring word, with irony requires a certain agility in order to render the abstraction that we fear harmless and to make the resulting experience that we hope to achieve both highly vivid and useful.” (Bunge, 1996, 249).


Aesthetic Thought


In view of the widely proliferating societal aesthetisation tendencies in a mediatised world, the German philosopher Wolfgang Welsch referred to the need to now recognise aesthetic thought as the only realistic form of thought in as early as 1990. According to Welsch’s description, the origin of aesthetic thought is observation. This then acts as a source of inspiration and is used alongside imagination and reflection to achieve an overall view of the phenomenon concerned:


Aim:

The aim is to lead every single student-subject into a process of intensive self-involvement through self-exposure to a principally experimental open learning situation where the student must organise and structure him or herself in order to develop his or her own artistic strategies and methods in the artistic research process and achieve his or her own artistic expression in the created and chosen form.

In the context of dealing with one’s own self and others, a context which can be clearly seen as a contingent probing process increasingly controlled by the subject’s own questions and actions and affected by the repressed, forgotten, different or re-experienced context and also by one’s own self, the student-subject produces a large number of results in the course of the artistic research process which includes intensive self-determination and determination of others as well as profound observation, research, collection, documentation, reflexion and association. These results are not deduced from the knowledge of general artistic strategies and methods; they are inductively obtained from the probing process itself and/or generated from the general knowledge of the students. To some extent they are even similar to scientific research strategies and methods where actual transitions can be enabled. The self-involvement in the research process stimulates self-orientation and self-organisation skills of the subject which also include self and process management skills (such as time structure, use of human and financial resources, media, material and other utilities, logistics, process monitoring, documentation and reflexion).

The artistic working method is subjected to an inductive logic and based on the extended notion of art. It even develops procedures from the process logic which bear a close resemblance to methodical strategies of contemporary art (e.g. Hirschhorn) – however without deductive reasoning or copying – and strongly promotes the development of an increased self-referentiality both as an aim and method of the subject which is, on

the one hand, expected to learn how to stand the contradictions, frustrations and individual dry spells, i.e. break-up, failure and a new start, inherent in an aesthetic-artistic process. On the other hand, the subject is required to extensively involve him or herself in the art project on a sensual, rational and spiritual level as well as actively grapple with aspects such as content, creation and form.

By working with the most different natural, cultural and societal contexts and ambiences, the subject increases his or her mental capability to let things flow, flexibility, sense of orientation and playfulness. By constantly destroying, re-arranging or newly arranging meanings in the shaping of individual moments of thinking and acting, by prompting him or herself into a state of restless activity, the subject becomes a creator and subject of his or her individual steps of life which are no longer experienced in a powerless and passive way. The principal openness inherent in the active-creative (self-) determination may lead the subject to a comprehensive physical-spiritual-mental rationality of a subject capable of emotions


References


Barthes, Roland. 1989. Die helle Kammer. Bemerkungen zur Photographie, 16-17.

Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.


Bering, Kunibert. 2008. Kunstdidaktik und Kulturkompetenz. Kunstportal. http:// www.schroedel.de/kunstportal/bilder/forum/2008-03-bering.pdf. Braunschweig: Schroedel Verlag.


Bunge, Matthias. 1996. Zwischen Intuition und Ratio. Pole des bildnerischen Denkens bei Kandinsky, Klee und Beuys. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.


Buschkühle, Carl-Peter. 2021. Wärmezeit. Zur Kunst als Kunstpädagogik bei Joseph Beuys. Bielefeld: Athena/Wbv. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05792-1_82


Buschkühle, Carl-Peter. 2020. Joseph Beuys and theArtistic Education. Theory and Practice of an Artistic Art Education. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004424555


Buschkühle, Carl-Peter, and Kettel, Joachim, and Urlaß, Mario (ed.). 2009. horizonte. Internationale Kunstpädagogik. Beiträge zum Internationalen InSEA-Kongress

»horizons/horizonte insea2007germany«. University of Education Heidelberg and University of Education Karlsruhe. 17. bis 20. Juli 2007. Oberhausen: Athena.


Buschkühle, Carl-Peter. 2007. Die Welt als Spiel. I. Kulturtheorie: Digitale Spiele und künstlerische Existenz. Die Welt als Spiel. II. Kunstpädagogik: Theorie und Praxis künstlerischer Bildung. Oberhausen: Athena.

Buschkühle, Carl-Peter. 2004. „Auf der Suche nach der Kunst – Kompetenzerwerb in künstlerischer Bildung“. In: Künstlerische Bildung nach Pisa. Beiträge zum internationalen Symposium »Mapping Blind Spaces – Neue Wege zwischen Kunst und Bildung. Museum für Neue Kunst im ZKM | Zentrum für Kunst und Medientechnologie Karlsruhe und Landesakademie Schloss Rotenfels 08.- 10.10.2003, edited by Joachim Kettel, Internationale Gesellschaft der Bildenden Künste (IGBK), and Landesakademie Schloss Rotenfels, 389-394. Oberhausen: Athena.


Buschkühle, Carl-Peter (ed.). 2002. Perspektiven künstlerischer Bildung. Beiträge zum Heidelberger Symposium „Künstlerische Bildung und die Schule der Zukunft“. Köln: Salon.


Buschkühle, Carl-Peter. 1997. Wärmezeit. Zur Kunst als Kunstpädagogik bei Joseph Beuys. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.


Busse, Klaus-Peter. 2009. Bildumgangsspiele einrichten mit einem künstlerischen Projekt von Katrin Laupenmühlen, Sehra Karakus und mit einem Vorwort von Marnie Westerhoff. Dortmunder Schriften zur Kunst. Studien zur Kunstdidaktik, Band 9. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.


Duncker, Ludwig. 2000. „Vom Sinn des Lernens. Bildungstheoretische Perspektiven für die Ausgestaltung schulischer Lernprozesse“. In Sinnverlust und Sinnorientierung in der Erziehung: Rekonstruktionen aus pädagogischer und theologischer Sicht, edited by Ludwig Duncker and Helmut Hanisch, 179-196. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.


Ehmer, Hermann K.. 1995. „An der Kunst gibt es nichts, absolut nichts für das Leben zu lernen“. Ein Gespräch zwischen Hermann K. Ehmer, Georg Peez und Werner Stehr. BDK-INFO Hessen 2/95.


Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. 1980. Farbenlehre. Mit Einleitungen und Kommentaren von Rudolf Steiner. Stuttgart: Freies Geistesleben.


Haarmann, Anke. 2011. Die andere Natur des Menschen. Philosophische Menschenbilder jenseits der Naturwissenschaft. Bielefeld: transcript. https://doi.org/10.1515/ transcript.9783839417614


Haarmann, Anke. 2011. Gibt es eine Methodologie künstlerischer Forschung?

Österreichische Forschungsgesellschaft, Onlinepublikation.


Haarmann, Anke. 2006. „Das städtische Selbst“. In Schrumpfende Städte, Shrinking Cities, Handlungskonzepte, Bd. 2, edited by Philipp Oswalt. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.


Hirschhorn, Thomas: http://www.thomashirschhorn.com/


Kettel, Joachim (ed.). 2017. The Missing_LINK 2016. Oberhausen: Athena.


Kettel, Joachim. 2012. „Warum künstlerisches Denken lernen?“ In Künstlerische Kunstpädagogik: Ein Diskurs zur künstlerischen Bildung, edited by Carl-Peter Buschkühle, 447-467. Oberhausen: Athena.


Kettel, Joachim, Internationale Gesellschaft der Bildenden Künste (IGBK), and Landesakademie Schloss Rotenfels (ed.). 2004. Künstlerische Bildung nach Pisa. Beiträge zum internationalen Symposium »Mapping Blind Spaces – Neue Wege zwischen Kunst und Bildung. Museum für Neue Kunst im ZKM | Zentrum für Kunst und Medientechnologie Karlsruhe und Landesakademie Schloss Rotenfels 08.-10.10.2003. Oberhausen: Athena.


Kettel, Joachim. 2001. SelbstFREMDheit. Elemente einer anderen Kunstpädagogik.

Oberhausen: Athena.


Klein, Julian. 2010. „Was ist künstlerische Forschung?“ In Gegenworte 23, Wissenschaft trifft Kunst, edited by Günter Stock, 25-28. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften: Akademie Verlag.


Lüthi, Michael. 2006. Die eigentliche Tätigkeit. Aktion und Erfahrung bei Bruce Nauman, edited by Erika Fischer-Lichte, and Robert Sollich, and Sandra Umathum, and Matthias Warstat. Auf der Schwelle. Kunst, Risiken und Nebenwirkungen. 57-74. Munich: Fink .


Marr, Stefanie. 2003. Lebenskunstunterricht. Bildliche Aneignung und Gestaltung von Lebenswirklichkeiten in der Kindheit. Siegen: universi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-322-80948-3_33

Niehoff, Rolf. 2007. Bildorientierung und Kunstpädagogik. Kunstportal. http://www. schroedel.de/kunstportal/bilder/forum/200709_text_niehoff.pdf. Braunschweig: Schroedel Verlag.


Regel, Günther. 2008. Das Künstlerische vermitteln ... Aufsätze, Vorträge, Statements und Gespräche zur Kunst, Kunstlehre und Kunstpädagogik. Munich: kopaed.


Roters, Eberhard. 2000. „Kunst ist ein Spiel, das Ernst macht.“ In Kunst ist ein Spiel, das Ernst macht. Eberhard Roters: Briefe und Texte 1949-1994, edited by Hanna Roters and Eva Züchner. Cologne: DuMont.


Roters, Eberhard. 1971. „Was die Schönheit sei, das weiß ich nicht.“ Künstler, Theorie, Werk. In Was die Schönheit sei, das weiß ich nicht. Katalog zur Zweiten Biennale, Nürnberg 1971. Kunsthalle Nürnberg, edited by Janni Müller-Hauck and Kunsthalle Nürnberg, 13-16. Cologne: DuMont.


Schmid, Wilhelm. 1992/2000. Auf der Suche nach einer neuen Lebenskunst. Die Frage nach dem Grund und die Neubegründung der Ethik bei Foucault. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.


Schmid, Wilhelm. 1998. Philosophie der Lebenskunst: Eine Grundlegung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.


Selle, Gert. 2004. Ästhetische Erziehung oder Bildung in der zweiten Moderne? Über ein Kontinuitätsproblem didaktischen Denkens. Hamburg: University Press.


Urlaß, Mario. Schulprojekte der künstlerischen Bildung. School Projects in the conception of Art Education. https://www.mario-urlass.de/lehre/schulprojekte/


Welsch, Wolfgang. 1996. Grenzgänge der Ästhetik. Stuttgart: Reclam. Welsch, Wolfgang. 1990: Ästhetischen Denken. Stuttgart: Reclam.