The Majoritarian Epistemology on Religious Symbols. A Religiously-Based Stereotyping Technique to “Package Others’ Religious Rights”


  • Rosaria Pirosa University of Florence



Religious pluralism, majoritarian epistemology, secularism, multiculturalism, stereotyping


The paper will focus on a particular form of stereotyping technique which aims to narrow religious rights for non-Christian believers, moving from an exclusively Judeo-Christian epistemology on religious symbols that, no by chance, defines them as “ostensive”. According to this perspective, freedom of religion is eminently a heartfelt attitude, therefore the term “ostensiveness” is intended to emphasize not mandatory behaviors, which are conceived as a redundant way to live faith. Starting from its philosophical assumptions, the article deals with the stereotyping tools related to religion, functional to conceal the social complexity and to deny legal protection, through a legal and political concept like state neutrality. The piece seeks to show how the concept of religious right, when it cannot be declined as a majoritarian right, is rife with plural levels of intersecting stereotyping, concerning other categories of diversity like gender and ‘ethnicity’. This approach flatters each dimension and does not take into account coexisting identities within the same person, ignoring that intersectionality highlights the necessity of assessing religious diversity as fundamentally socially located. This stereotyping attitude can be traced back to the complex relationship between law and religion that provides a direct way to assess crucial issues like belonging, identity, community and authority. Law, as a cultural and non-neutral construct, regards religion as a valuable fact and worthy of legal protection since it is attributable to an individual phenomenon and as quintessentially private matter. Therefore, to assess identity or belonging in the fault lines of the interaction of law and religion means find an opportunity to legitimize targeting law related to religious diversity making it seems like a way to deal with religious ‘differences’ that cannot be assimilated. In this respect, we discuss about the radical secularist claims through a case-study, namely the “affaire Québécois” within the Canadian system, not only in a geographical sense, but in the theoretical field mapped out by religious pluralism as the focal point of the multiculturalist approach, on one hand, and the secularist revival, on the other hand.


AVALLONE, G. and TORRE S. (2018) 'Prefazione', in Bellinvia, T., Poguish T. (eds.), Decolonizzare le migrazioni. Razzismo, confini, marginalità. Milano-Udine: Mimesis/Cartografie sociali.

BAUBEROT, J. (2006) L'intégrisme républicain contre la laïcité. La Tour d'Aigues: L'Aube.

BEAMAN, L. and BAYER, P. (2019) 'Dimensions of Diversity: Toward a more complex conceptualization' Religions, 10, pp. 1-15.

BELLEFLEUR, C. (2016), 'Journal des debats de la Commission des institutions', Assemblée National du Québec, 2nd November, (44), (150).

BERGER, B.L. (2011) 'Key Theoretical Issues in the Interaction of Law and Religion: A Guide for Perplexed', Constitutional Forum, 19 (2), pp. 41-52.

BERGER, B.L. (2012) 'Inducing Fundamentalism: Law as a cultural force in the domain of religion' Diversity Magazine, Special Issue, 9 (3), pp. 25-28.

BERGER, B.L. and MOON, R. (2016a) 'Introduction: Religious Neutrality and the Exercise of Public Authority', in Berger, B.L., Moon R., (eds.) Religion and the Exercise of Public Authority. London-Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 1-9.

BERGER, B. (2016b) Against Circumspection, in Berger B.L., Moon R. (eds.) Religion and the Exercise of Public Authority. London-Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 23-40.

BERGER, B. and MOON R. (eds.) (2016) Religion and the Exercise of Public Authority, London e Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016.

BRAMADAT, P., DAWSON L. (eds.) (2014) Religious Radicalization and Securitization in Canada and Beyond. Toronto-Buffalo-London: University of Toronto Press.

BRUBAKER, R. (1996) Nationalism Reframed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BUTLER, J. (2010) Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London-New-York: Routledge, 2010.

CLARKE, B. and MACDONALD, S. (2017) Leaving Christianity: Changing Allegiances in Canada since 1945. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.

Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse (2019) Memoire à la Commission des institutions de l'Assemblée nationale - Projet de loi n. 21, Loi sur la laïcité de l'État, Québec, May.

COOK, R. J. and CUSACK S. (2009) Gender Stereotyping: Transnational Legal Perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

GARBAGNOLI, S. and PREARO, M. (2017) La croisade "anti-genre" du Vatican aux manifs pour tous. Paris: editions Textuel, tr. it. (2018) La crociata "anti-gender"dal Vaticano alle manif pour tous. Torino: kaplan.

HUNTINGTON, S. (1997) The Clashes of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order. London: Penguin Book.

Italian Constitutional Court (1975), Judgement n. 188, 8 July.

Italian Constitutional Court (1979), Judgement n. 117, 10 October.

Italian Constitutional Court (1989), Judgement n. 203, 12 April.

KNOTT, K., POOLE, E. and TAIRA, T. (2013) Media Portrayals of Religion and the Secular Sacred. London-New York: Routledge.

KYMLICKA, W. (1999) 'Liberal Complacencies' in Cohen, J., Howard, M., Nussbaum

M.C. (eds.), Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? With Respondents. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 31-34.

KYMLICKA, W. (2010) 'The rise and fall of multiculturalism? New debates on inclusion and accommodation in diverse societies' International Social Science Journal, 61, pp. 97-112.

LAMPRON, L. P. (2016), 'Journal des débats de la Commission des Institutions', Assemblée nationale du Québec, 2nd November, (44), (150).

LEFEBVRE, S. and TRIKI-YAMANI, A. (2011) 'Jeunes adultes immigrants de deuxième generation. Dynamiques ethnoreligieuses et identitaires' Études ethniques canadiennes/Canadian Ethnic Studies, 43, pp. 183-211.

MACDONALD, R. A. (2011) 'Custom Made - For a Non-chirographic Critical Legal Pluralism' Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 26 (2), pp. 301-327.

MACLURE, J. (2016) The meaning and Entailment of the Religious Neutrality of the State: The Case of Public Employees, in Berger, B.L., Moon R. (eds.) Religion and the Exercise of Public Authority. London-Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 11-22.

MILOT, M. (2013) 'Dualisme des conceptions de laïcité au Québec et en France' The Tocqueville Review/La Review Tocqueville, 24 (1), pp. 17-42. https://muse.jhu. edu/article/511771

MODOOD, T. (2013) Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea. Cambridge: Polity Press.

MOON, R. (2012) 'Accomodation and compromise: why freedom of religion issues cannot be resolved through balancing' Diversity Magazine, Special Issue, 9 (3), pp. 40-43.

OKIN, S.M (1999) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? in Cohen, J., Howard, M., Nussbaum M.C. (eds.) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? With Respondents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

PAREKH, B. (2000) Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

PHILLIPS, A. (2007) Multiculturalism without Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

RAVÀ, A. (1959) Contributo allo studio dei diritti individuali e collettivi di libertà religiosa nella Costituzione italiana. Milano: Giuffrè, 1959.

RYAN, P. (2010) Multicultiphobia. Toronto-Buffalo-London: University of Toronto Press. RYDER, B. (2008) 'The Canadian Conception of Equal Religious Citizenship' in Moon, R. (ed.), Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada. Vancouver- Toronto: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 87-109.

SAID, E. W. (2003) Orientalism. London: Penguin.

SANDEL, M. (1984) 'The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self' Political Theory, 12 (1), pp. 81-96.

SEDGWICK, E.K. (1990) Epistemology of the Closet, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Supreme Court of Canada (1985), R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd, 24 April, 1 SCR 295. Supreme Court of Canada (1986), R. v Oakes, 28 February, 1 SCR 103.

Supreme Court of Canada (2004), Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 30 June, 2SCR, 2004 SCC 47.

Spanish Constitutional Tribunal (2001), judgement n. 46, 15 February.

TODOROV, T. (1982) La conquête de l'Amerique. La question de l'autre. Paris: Éditions Points.

TRIANDAFYLLIDOU, A. (2017) Nation and Religion: Dangerous Liaisons in Triandafyllidou, A. Modood, T. (eds.) The Problem of Religious Diversity, European Challenges, Asian Approach. Edimburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 37-37.

WEINSTOCK, D. (2011) 'Beyond Objective and Subjective: Assessing the Legitimacy of Religious Claims to Accomodation', Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum, 6 (2), pp. 155-175.



How to Cite

Pirosa, R. (2021). The Majoritarian Epistemology on Religious Symbols. A Religiously-Based Stereotyping Technique to “Package Others’ Religious Rights”. The Age of Human Rights Journal, (16), 278–291.