Hobbes and the economic, social and cultural rights of the universal declaration of human rights

Javier Hernández; Santiago  Dussan

doi:10.17561/tahrj.v17.6572

Authors

Javier Hernández Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Cali
Santiago Dussan Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Cali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v17.6572

Keywords:

Economic, social and cultural rights, natural rights, Thomas Hobbes, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, travaux préparatoires, state power

Abstract

This article argues that the conceptions of natural rights in Hobbes’s theory and of economic, social and cultural rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights have three common features that serve to justify the thesis that a satisfactory order of coexistence cannot be achieved without extensive state power. Both conceptions identify rights with interests whose satisfaction is considered paramount. Both perspectives see the state as the shaper of the legal order that rights do not create. Finally, both see the state as the entity that must monopolize the management of individual interests represented in rights. This article suggests that these findings are paradoxical when confronted with the main motivation behind the drafting of the Declaration.

References

Curran, E. (2002) ‘Hobbes’s theory of rights - A modern interest theory’, Journal of Ethics, 6(1), pp. 63–86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25115715

Curran, E. (2013) ‘An Immodest Proposal: Hobbes Rather than Locke Provides a Forerunner for Modern Rights Theory’, Law and Philosophy, 32(4), pp. 515–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-012-9149-y

Diller, J. (2012) Securing Dignity and Freedom Through Human Rights’: Article 22 of the Universal Declaration of Human Right. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff.

Dun, F. van (2001) ‘Human Dignity’: Reason or Desire? Natural Rights versus Human Rights’, Journal of Libertarian Studies, 15(4), pp. 1–28.

Finkelstein, C. (2001) ‘A Puzzle About Hobbes on Self-Defense’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 82(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00131

Gauthier, D. (1969) The Logic of Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Gauthier, D. (2001) ‘Hobbes: The Laws of Nature’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 82(3-4), pp. 258–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00128

Glendon, M. A. (1999) ‘Foundations of Human Rights: The Unfinished Business’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 44(1).

Gottfried, P. (2002) ‘Locke, Hobbes, and The UD: Comment on Van Dun’, Journal of Libertarian Studies, 16(3), pp. 83–87.

Green, M. (2012) ‘Hobbes and Human Rights’, in Lloyd, S. A. (ed.) Hobbes Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139047388.020

Grotius, H. (2005) The Rights of War and Peace. Edited by R. Tuck. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.

Hampton, J. (1986) Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625060

Hobbes, T. (1969) The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic. London: Frank Cass & Co.

Hobbes, T. (1991) Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive). Edited by B. Gert. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Hobbes, T. (1998) Leviathan. Edited by J. C. A. Gaskin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hughes, G. (2011) ‘The Concept of Dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2010.00463.x

Johns, C. (2009) ‘The Grounds of Right and Obligation in Leibniz and Hobbes’, The Review of Metaphysics, 62(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/40387825

Kavka, G. S. (1986) Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Locke, J. (2003) Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Edited by I. Shapiro. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Marks, S. P. (2009) ‘The Past and Future of the Separation of Human Rights into Categories’, Maryland Journal of International Law, 24(1), pp. 208–241. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mjil/vol24/iss1/19

Martinich, A.. (1995) A Hobbes Dictionary. Cambridge: Blackwell.

McArthur, N. (2012) ‘“Thrown amongst Many”: Hobbes on Taxation and Fiscal Policy’, in Lloyd, S. A. (ed.) Hobbes Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139047388.011

McCrudden, C. (2008) ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’, The European Journal of International Law, 19(4), pp. 655–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043

Morales, L. (2018) ‘The Discontent of Social and Economic Rights’, Res Publica, 24, pp. 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9353-6

Morsink, J. (1999) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: origins, drafting and intent. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Pettit, P. (2005) ‘Liberty and Leviathan’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 4(1), pp. 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X05049439

Pettit, P. (2012) ‘Freedom in Hobbes’s Ontology and Semantics: A Comment on Quentin Skinner’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 73(1), pp. 111–126.

Scott, C. and Macklem, P. (1992) ‘Constitutional Ropes of Sand or Justiciable Guarantees? Social Rights in a New South African Constitution’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 141(1), pp. 1–148.

Sreedhar, S. (2019) ‘Interpreting Hobbes on Civil Liberties and Rights of Resistance’, in Interpreting Hobbes’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108234870.009

Suárez, F. (1918) Tratado de las leyes y de Dios legislador. Madrid: Reus.

Tierney, B. (2004) ‘The Idea of Natural Rights-Origins and Persistence’, Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 2(1). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol2/iss1/2

Tierney, B. (2008) ‘Historical Roots of Modern Rights: Before Locke and After’, in Frohnen, B. and Grasso, K. (eds) Rethinking Rights: Historical, Political, and Philosophical Perspectives. University of Missouri Press, pp. 34–57.

Vitoria, F. (1934) Commentarios a la Secunda Secundae de Santo Tomas. Madrid: Asociación Francisco de Vitoria.