DNA Databases for Criminal Justice System: A Pathway towards Utopian or Dystopian Future?

Authors

  • Rahime Erbaş Istanbul University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v18.6592

Keywords:

DNA evidence, DNA database, Crime-solving, Criminal Law, Utopia, Dystopia

Abstract

Abstract:  DNA evidence has increasingly become a widespread instrument in solving crime as well as crime prevention. As such, creation of DNA databases or expanding the existing ones have been on the rise in the world. On the one side, storing DNA profiles serves as a pivotal tool in crime solving, but on the other, privacy based on genome concerns occur. DNA databases appears as an example of biotechnology today and in the future that are argued in a spectrum ranging from utopia to dystopia. This methodical approach, of course, is nothing new or novel for a DNA database-related study. This study, however, aims to analyse the matter from the standpoint of criminal law and to discuss whether the modus operandi of criminal procedure on the use of DNA databases paves the way towards utopian or dystopian vision for future. As such, after introducing theme and indicating scope of the study (I), it provides an overview regarding the involvement of DNA as evidence and respectively database in criminal justice system in the world (II).  Whether databases established for criminal justice system serve for dystopian.

References

Amankwaa, A. O., & McCartney, C. (2019). The effectiveness of the UK national DNA database. Forensic Science International: Synergy(1), 45-55.

Amelung, N., & Machado, H. (2019). Affected for good or for evil: The formation of issue-publics that relate to the UK National DNA Database. Public Understanding of Science, 28(5), 590-605.

Ashworth, A., & Redmayne, M. (2010). The Criminal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Atalay, A. Ö. (2019). Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunda Moleküler Genetik İncelemelerin Özel Nitelikli Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Penal Law and Criminology, 7(2), 127-184.

Council of Europe. (n.d.). Turkey. Retrieved Dcember 2019, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/turkey

Council Regulation (EC). 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime [2008] OJ L 210/1 Art 2.

Cutter, A. M. (2006). To Clear or To Convict? The Role of Genomics in Criminal Justice. Genomics, Society and Policy, 2(1), 1–15.

Dahl, J. Y., & Rudinow, A. (2009). ‘‘It all happened so slowly’’ e On controlling function creep in forensic DNA databases. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 37, 83- 103.

DNA Exonerations in the United States. (n.d.). Retrieved from The Innocence Project: https://www.innocenceproject.org/dna-exonerations-in-the-united-states/

Elster, N. (2017, 6 December). How Forensic DNA Evidence Can Lead to Wrongful Convictions. October 2020 tarihinde https://daily.jstor.org/forensic-dna-evidence-can-lead-wrongful-convictions/ adresinden alındı

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2020, January 17). O.J. Simpson trial. November 2020 tarihinde https://www.britannica.com/event/O-J-Simpson-trial adresinden alındı

Enlargement. (n.d.). Retrieved September 2019, from European Commission: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/enlarg/candidates.htm

Erbaş, R. (2017). The Tension between Genome Privacy and Criminal Justice in the Wake of DNA Databases. 5(2), pp. 163-178.

Etzioni, A. (2004). DNA Tests and Databases in Criminal Justice Individual Rights and the Common Good. In D. Lazer, DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice (pp. 197-223). MIT Press.

EUR-Lex . (n.d.). Retrieved September 2019, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Ajl0005/

European Union. (n.d.). Council Regulation (EC), 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime [2008] OJ L 210/1 art 2. Retrieved October 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008D0615

Gill, P. (2012). Misleading DNA Evidence: Reasons for Miscarriages of Justice. International Commentary on Evidence, 10(1).

Gorgey, A. D. (1990). The advent of dna databanks: Implications for information privacy 16(3), 381-398. (Vol. 16). American Journal of Law & Medicine.

Home Office. (n.d.). National DNA Database statistics, Q1 2019 to 2020. Retrieved September 2019, from <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/818992/NDNAD_Website_statistics_Q1_19-20.ods

James, R. (2009, June 19). A Brief History of DNA Testing. Retrieved from TIME: http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1905706,00.html

Jeweris, C. (2020, October 28). Cold case murder of Montana girl, five, is solved 46 years later after DNA evidence from the scene identified killer as a man who died in 2012. Retrieved October 2020, from Daily Mail: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8888827/Cold-case-murder-Montana-girl-five-solved-46-years-later-new-DNA-evidence.html

Küzeci, E. (2010). Kişisel Verilerin Korunması. Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi.

Kaye, D. H., Bieber, F. R., & Primorac, D. (2014). DNA as Evidence in the Courtroom. In D. Primorac, & M. Schanfield, Forensic DNA Applications An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 509-525). CRC Press.

Kaye, J. (2006). Police collection and access to DNA samples. Genomics, Society and Policy, 2(1), 16–27.

Koehler, J. J. (1993). Error and Exaggeration in the Presentation of DNA Evidence at Trial. Jurimetrics Journal, 34(1), 21-39.

Machado, H., & Granja, R. (2020). DNA Databases and Big Data. In H. Machado, & R. Granja, Forensic Genetics in the Governance of Crime (pp. 57-70). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

Machado, H., & Granja, R. (2020). DNA Technologies in Criminal Investigation and Courts. In H. Machado, & R. Granja, Forensic Genetics in the Governance of Crime (pp. 45-56). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

Marx, G. T. (1998, April 20). DNA 'Fingerprints' May One Day Be Our National ID Card. https://web.mit.edu/gtmarx/www/dna.html adresinden alındı

McDonald, H. (2020, October 27). Police hope DNA from helmets will solve 1982 Troubles murder case. October 2020 tarihinde The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/oct/27/police-hope-dna-from-helmets-will-solve-1982-troubles-case adresinden alındı

McDonald, H. (2020, October 27). Police hope DNA from helmets will solve 1982 Troubles murder case. The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/oct/27/police-hope-dna-from-helmets-will-solve-1982-troubles-case adresinden alındı

Rice, A. (2009). Brave New Circuit: Creeping Towards DNA Database Dystopia in U.S. v. Weikert. Roger Williams University Law Review, 14(3), 691-728.

Rothstein, M. A., & Talbott, M. K. (2006). The Expanding Use of DNA in Law Enforcement: What Role for Privacy? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(2), 153-164.

S and Marper v. The United Kingdom, 30562/04 and 30566/04 (ECHR December 4, 2008).

Santos, F., Machado, H., & Silva, S. (2013). Forensic DNA databases in European countries: is size linked to performance? Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 9, 1-13.

Silverstein, J. (2013). The Dark Side of DNA Evidence. Retrieved October 2020, from The Nation: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/dark-side-dna-evidence/

The American Medical Association (AMA). (n.d.). AMA Code of Medical Ethics. Retrieved November 2020, from https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/medical-testimony

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. (2020, October 7). The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2020. Retrieved from https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2020/10/press-chemistryprize2020.pdf

Thompson, W. C. (1996). DNA Evidence in the O.J. Simpson Trial. University of Colorado Law Review, 67.

Thompson, W. C. (2013). Forensic DNA Evidence: The Myth of Infallibility. In S. Krimsky, & J. Gruber, Genetic Explanations: Sense and Nonsense (pp. 227-347). Harvard University Press.

Tokgöz, H. B. (2020). Cezalandırmanın Amacı ve Bu Bağlamda Ütopyalar Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 431-467.

Tracy, P. E., & Morgan, V. (2000). Big Brother and His Science Kit: DNA Databases for 21st Century Crime Control. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 635-690.

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Viewing CSI and the Threshold of Guilt: Managing Truth and Justice in Reality and Fiction. The Yale Law Journal, 115(5), 1050-1085.

Uygun, B. B. (2017). Databases and Criminal Procedures in Switzerland and Turkey with Regard to European Council’s Standards. Journal of Penal Law and Criminology, 5(2), 89-106.

Uğurlubay, G. A. (2017). Almanya, İsviçre ve Avusturya Hukuku Bağlamında Türk Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunda Adlî DNA Analizleri. Journal of Penal Law and Criminology, 5(2), 29-87.

Williams , R., & Johnson, P. (2004). Circuits of Surveillance. Surveill Soc. , 2(1), 1-14.

Yargıtay 2 CD, Date: 06.03.2019, E. 2017/475, K. 2019/4351.

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/function-creep.

Published

2022-06-23

How to Cite

Erbaş, R. (2022). DNA Databases for Criminal Justice System: A Pathway towards Utopian or Dystopian Future?. The Age of Human Rights Journal, (18), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v18.6592

Issue

Section

Open Section