Bottling the Criminal Contempt Law – A Search for ‘Intention’ in ‘Scandalizing the Court’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v22.8305Keywords:
Criminal contempt, Free speech, Scandalizing, fair criticism, mens rea, contempt of courtAbstract
The right to speak and express freely is arguably the most contentious fundamental right guaranteed to the citizens by the Indian Constitution. Like all the other rights and privileges in a democracy, freedom of speech is not absolute and is subject to restrictions. One such restriction is the offence of contempt of court. In doing so, courts have been successful in upholding their dignity and majesty but often at the cost of stifling criticism and instilling fear amongst the critics of the institution. There is a sense of anxiety among the citizens as they anticipate an over-disciplined regime and struggle to understand what constitutes criminal contempt and how it works. In this article, the authors have attempted to suggest a development in the existing criminal contempt law by scrutinising the mental element of the publisher or the person making the criticism.
References
ABHINAV CHANDRACHUD, REPUBLIC OF RHETORIC 16 (Penguin Random House India 2017)
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) SCC Online SC 25
Arundhati Roy vs Unknown AIR 2002 SC 1375
Attorney General v. Butterworth 1963 (1) Q.B 696
Attorney-General for NSW v. Mundey (1972) 2 NSWLR 887
Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] AC 273
Baradakanta Mishra v. The Registrar of Orissa High Court 1974 AIR 710
BORRIC & LOWE, LAW OF CONTEMPT 3rd EDITION 331 (LexisNexis Butterworths 1996)
Brahma Prakash Sharma & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh 1953 SCR 1169
Chhaganlal Ishwardas Shah v. Emperor 1933 SCC Online Bom 96
Chokolingo v. AF of Trinidad and Tobago [1981] 1 All ER 244, ¶ 248
CK Daphtary v. OP Gupta 1971 AIR 1132
Commissioner, Agra v. Rohtas Singh (1998) 4 SCC 409
Contempt of Courts Act, 1926, No. 12, Acts of Parliament, 1926 (India)
Dr. D.C. Saxena vs Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Of India 1996 SCC (7) 216
E.M. Sankaran Namboodripad v. T. Narayanan Nambiar AIR 1970 SC 2015
E.M.S. Namboodripad v. T. Narayan Nambiar 1970 SCC (2) 325
Fali S. Nariman, Contempt of Court: NJA Occasional Paper Series No. 2, NJA OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES (January 2004), http://www.nja.nic.in/Jounals_Publications_Newsletters/NJA%20Ocacasional%20Paper%20Series%20No.2.pdf
Gallagher v. Durack (1983) 152 CLR 238, ¶ 243
Grossman, Freedom of Speech and Expression in India, 4 U.C.L.A.L.R. 64 (1957)
H.N. SANYAL COMMITTEE, REPORT OF COMM. ON CONTEMPT OF COURT, H.D. 153 (1963)
Hari Singh Nagra & Ors. V. Kapil Sibal & Ors. 2011 Cri LJ 102 (SC)
In re Hira Lal Dixit 1955 1 SCR 677
In Re S. Mulgaokar v. Unknown (1978) 3 SCC 339
In Re Vinay Chandra Mishra AIR 1995 SC 2348
In Re: Arundhati Roy v. Unknown AIR 2002 SC 1375
In Re: Harijai Singh And Anr. AIR 1997 SC 73
In re: Marmaduke Pickthall (1923) 25 Bom LR 15
In Re: Prashant Bhushan and Ors. AIR 2020 SC 4114
INDIA CONSTITUTION 1950
J. Moskovitz, ‘Contempt of Injunctions, Civil and Criminal’ (1943) 43 COL. L. REV. 780.
John Fairfax & Sons Proprietary Ltd. v. McRae (1955) 93 CLR 351 ¶ 371
Justice K.S. Puttuswamy v. Union of India (2019) 1 SCC 1
Mahipal Singh Rana v. State of U.P. (2016) 8 SCC 335
Mriganka Shekhar Dutta ET. AL., ‘Contempt of Court, Finding the Limit’, 2 NUJS L. Rev (2009)
Mrityunjoy Das & Anr. v. Sayed Hasibur Rahaman & Ors. AIR 2001 SC 1293
Odhams Press Ltd., ex p. Attorney-General [1957] 3 All ER 494
P.C. Sen vs Unknown AIR 1970 SC 1821
P.N. Duda v. V.P. Shankar & Ors. 1988 AIR 1208
Perspective Publications v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1970 SC 221
R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court (2009) 8 SCC 106
Pritam Pal v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Through Registrar (1993) Supp. (1) SCC 529
Professor Goodhart, Newspapers on Contempt of Court, (1935) 48 HARV L. REV. 885, 898
R v Duffy, ex parte Nash [1960] 2 QB 188 ¶ 200
R v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592
R v. Almon, 1765 Wilmot 243
Rajeev Dhawan ET. AL., Publish and be Damned – The Contempt Power and the Press at the Bar of the Supreme Court, 21 J.I.L.I. 1, 8 (1979)
Rakesh Shukla, Contempt Powers of Indian Courts don’t Measure up to Principles of Natural Justice, THE WIRE (5 August 2020), https://thewire.in/law/contempt-powers-of-indian-courts-dont-measure-up-to-the-principles-of-natural-justice
Rama Dayal Markarha v. State of Madhya Pradesh 1978 AIR 921
Re: Patrick Anthony Chinamasa, S.C. 113/2000, 6 November 2000
Regina v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, Ex Parte Blackburn (No. 2) [2002] UKHL 20
Roach v. Garvan (or Hall) (1742) 2 Atk. 291, 469
S v Mamabolo 2001 (5) BCLR 449 at 68 ¶ 45
S v. Nan Kiekerk 1970 (3) SA 655 (T)
S. Mulgaokar vs Unknown (1978) 3 SCC 339
S.P. Sathe, Accountability of the Supreme Court, 37 E.P.W 1384 (2002), https://www.epw.in/journal/2002/15/commentary/accountability-supreme-court.html
Sahara India v. SEBI AIR 2012 SC 3829; R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court (2009) 8 SCC 106
Shadrake Alan v. Attorney-General [2011] SGCA 26
Shubham Kashyap Kalita ET. AL., Contempt of Court vis-à-vis Freedom of Speech and Expression in reference to the curious case of Prashant Bhushan: Paving the Way for Constructive Criticism, 11 ICLRQ 1, 131 (2020)
Sukhdev Singh Sodhi v. The Chief Justice and Judges of the Pepsu High Court 1954 AIR 156
Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India & Anr. (1998) 4 SCC 409
The Charter Act, 1774, § 21, No. 63, Acts of Parliament, 1774 (United Kingdom concerning India)
The Contempt of Courts Act, 1952, No. 32, Acts of Parliament, 1952 (India)
The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, No. 70, Acts of Parliament, 1952 (India)
The Indian High Courts Act, 1861, § 9, 11, No. 104, Acts of Parliament, 1861 (United Kingdom concerning India)
The Letters Patent Act, 1865, No. 15, Acts of Parliament (United Kingdom concerning India)
Vijay Pratap Singh v. Ajit Prasad AIR 1966 All. 305
Wong Yeung NG v Secretary for Justice [1999] 2 HKC 24
‘WHO GOES TO COURT?’ EX-CJI RANJAN GOGOI SAYS JUDICIARY IS ‘RAMSHACKLED’, https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/who-goes-to-court-ex-cji-ranjan-gogoi-says-judiciary-is-ramshackled-169809 (last visited on 14 June 2021)
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vijay Tyagi, Vaibhav Chadha, Lavam Tyagi, Shambhavi Srivastava
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
