The Patient's Right to Self-Determination as a Foundational Human Right in Healthcare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v26.9748Keywords:
Human rights, Constitutional rights, Patient rights, Informed consent, Health law, Patient autonomyAbstract
The patient’s right to self-determination represents a break from medical paternalism in healthcare law. Although not always explicitly codified, this study argues that the right is constitutionally guaranteed through a holistic reading of dignity, autonomy, and bodily integrity. Framed as a hybrid constitutional right, it imposes both negative and positive obligations on the state. As a ‘precondition right’, it underpins all other healthcare entitlements. Although widely recognized in theory, restrictive practices—such as bans on abortion, euthanasia, and advance directives—show that this acceptance has not been consistently realized, underscoring the need to secure it as an implicit constitutional right.
Downloads
References
ALAN, S. (2005). Adana’da Eğitim Hastanelerinde Sağlık Hizmeti Alanlar ile Verenlerin Özerkliğe Saygı ve Paternalizme Yatkınlıkları (Respect for Autonomy and Paternalistic Tendencies Among Healthcare Recipients and Providers in Training Hospitals in Adana). Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
ANGELOS, P. (2007). Ethical Issues in Cancer Patient Care. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
AYDIN, E. (2001). Tıp Etiğine Giriş (Introduction to Medical Ethics). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
BAĞÇECI, H. (2023). Hastanın Kendi Geleceğini Belirleme Hakkı. İstanbul: Oniki Levha Yayıncılık.
Bartling v. Superior Court, 163 Cal App 3d 186; 209 Cal Rptr 220 (1984).
BEAUCHAMP, T. L. and CHILDRESS, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BEDAU, H. A. (1968). ‘The Right to Life’, The Monist, 52, p. 567.
BERG, J. W., APPELBAUM, P. S., LIDZ, C. W. and PARKER, L. S. (2001). Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. London: Oxford University Press.
BERTRAND CATTINARI, E. (2015). The doctrine of “implied limitations” of fundamental rights: An argument against legal paternalism (University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper No. 15-18). University of Leicester.
BREIER-MACKIE, S. (2001). ‘Patient Autonomy and Medical Paternity: Can Nurses Help Doctors to Listen to Patients?’, Nursing Ethics, 8(6), p. 512.
BVerfG (2020). Urteil des Zweiten Senats vom 26. Februar 2020 – 2 BvR 2347/15. Available at: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2020/02/rs20200226_2bvr234715.html [Accessed 23 Jun. 2025].
CHILDRESS, J. F. (2001). ‘Christian Ethics, Medicine and Genetics’, in Gill, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 18.
CHRISTMAN, J. (2004). ‘Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves’, Philosophical Studies, 117(1), pp.143-164.
COHEN-ALMAGOR, R. (1994). The Boundaries of Liberty and Tolerance. Florida: University Press of Florida.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE (n.d.). European Treaty Series No. 164, Preamble. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98 [Accessed 29.10.2025].
COUNCIL OF EUROPE (1997). Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo Convention), European Treaty Series No.164, Preamble. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98 [Accessed 29.10.2025].
DEVETTERE, R. J. (2000). Practical Decision Making in Health Care. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
DIMMOCK, M. and FISHER, A. (2017). ‘Euthanasia’, in Ethics for A-Level (1st ed.). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, pp. 123-141.
DRANE, J. F. (1994). Clinical Bioethics: Theory and Practice in Medical Ethical Decision Making. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
DOYAL, L. and Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
DWORKIN, R. (1986). ‘Autonomy and Demented Self’, The Milbank Quarterly, 64(2), p. 6.
DWORKIN, R. (1991). Justice and the Good Life. Kansas: Lindley Lecture.
DWORKIN, R. (1994). Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia and Individual Freedom. London: First Vintage Books Edition.
DWORKIN, R. (2002). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972). Argued 17–18 November 1971, Decided 22 March 1972.
EROĞUL, C. (1993). ‘Ölüm Hakkı (Right to Die)’, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 48(1-4), p. 53.
FARRELL, R. C. (2007). ‘An excess of methods: Identifying implied fundamental rights in the Supreme Court’, Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 26(2), pp. 315-340.
FAUNDES, A. and BARZELATTO, J. (2006). The Human Drama of Abortion: A Global Search for Consensus. Tennessee: Vanderbilt University Press.
FEINBERG, J. (1978). ‘Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7(2), p. 94.
FORRESTER, K. and GRIFFITHS, D. (2005). Essential of Law for Health Professionals (2nd ed.). Marrickville: Elsevier Australia Publications.
GERMAN CIVIL CODE § 1901a. Requirements for advance healthcare directives. Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html [Accessed 27 Apr. 2025].
GÖREN, Z. (1993). ‘Türk-Alman Hukukunda Kişiliğin Korunması (Protection of Personality in Turkish and German Law)’, Anayasa Yargısı, 9(27), p. 174.
HARDWIG, J. (1997). Dying at the Right Time: Reflection on Assisted Suicide’, in LaFollette, H. (ed.), Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. London: Blackwell Publishers, p. 57.
HAYRY, H. (1991). The Limits of Medical Paternalism. London: Routledge.
HERREROS, B., BENITO, M., GELLA, P., et al. (2020). ‘Why have advance directives failed in Spain?’, BMC Medical Ethics, 21(113).
HESS, L., et al. (2013). ‘Euthanasia: Considerations, Concerns, and Complications’, Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery, 27(1), pp. 53-58.
HOGGARD, R. (1989). Liberty and Legislation. London: Routledge
İNCEOĞLU, S. (2006). ‘İnsan Hakları Bakımından Ötanazi (Euthanasia from the Perspective of Human Rights)’, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), p. 290.
KABOĞLU, İ.Ö. (2002). Özgürlükler Hukuku (Law of Liberties). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
KATZ, J. (1986). The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. New York: The Free Press.
KLEIN, E. (2002). ‘Human Dignity in German Law’, in Kretzmer, D. and Klein, E. (eds.), The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 153.
KLEINMAN, A. (1988). The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition. New York: Basic Books.
KOYUNCUOĞLU, T. (1980). ‘Özgürlüğün Önkoşulu Olarak Yaşama Hakkı (The Right to Life as a Precondition of Freedom)’, Günümüzde Yargı, 49, p. 13.
KROFT, D. (1997). ‘Informed Consent: A Comparative Analysis’, International Law and Practice, 6(3), p. 464.
KRUMMRADT, R. and VAN REEN, L. T. (2002). Healthy Thoughts: Europe Perspectives on Health Care Ethics. Massachusetts: Peeters Publishers.
LINZER, N. (1996). Ethical Dilemmas in Jewish Communal Services. New Jersey: KTAV Publishing House.
MANNING, M. (1998). Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide. New Jersey: Paulist Press.
MASLOW, A.H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.
MCMILLAN, R. C., ENGELHARDT, H. T. Jr. and SPICKER, S. F. (eds.) (1987). Euthanasia and the Newborn. Dordrecht: Springer Publishing Company.
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (2015). UKSC 11 (Supreme Court of the United Kingdom).
MUMCU, A. (1992). İnsan Hakları ve Kamu Özgürlükleri (Human Rights and Public Liberties). Ankara: Savaş Yayınları.
NIŞANYAN, S. (2009). Sözlerin Soyağacı (The Genealogy of Words). İstanbul: Adam Yayınları.
NORDGREN, S. and FRIDLUND, B. (2001). ‘Patients’ Perceptions of Self-Determination as Expressed in the Context of Care’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(1), p. 118.
NYS, H. (1997). ‘Emerging Legislation on Europe on the Legal Status of Advanced Directives and Medical Decision Making with Respect to an Incompetent Patient (Living Will)’, European Journal of Health Law, 4, pp. 185-187.
OĞUZ, Y. (1994). Psikiyatride Onam ve Aydınlatılmış Onam (Consent and Informed Consent in Psychiatry). Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
O’NEILL, O. (2002). Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’NEILL, O. (2003). ‘Some limits of informed consent’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(1), pp. 4-7.
ÖZKAN, N. (1997). Türk Ceza Hukukunda Ötanazi (Euthanasia in Turkish Criminal Law). Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
PORCAR RODADO, E., PERAL SANCHEZ, D. and GISBERT GRIFO, M. (2021). ‘El documento de voluntades anticipadas: Comparativa de la legislación actual en el marco de la Unión Europea’, Revista Española de Medicina Legal, 47(2), pp. 66-73.
R. v. Morgentaler (1988). 1 SCR 30. Supreme Court of Canada.
RACHELS, J. (1975). ‘Active and Passive Euthanasia’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 292(2), pp. 78-80.
RACHELS, J. (1997). Can Ethics Provide Answers? Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
RICH, B. A. (2001). Strange Bedfellows. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973); see: Payment, S. (2003). Supreme Court Cases Through Primary Sources. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group.
RUIZ, B. R. (1998). ‘The Right to Privacy: A Discourse-Theoretical Approach’, Ratio Juris, 11(2), p. 158.
SAVCI, B. (1978). ‘Yaşam Hakkı ve Toplum (Right to Life and Society)’, İnsan Hakları Armağanı. Ankara: Birleşmiş Milletler Türk Derneği, p. 2.
SAVCI, B. (1980). Yaşam Hakkı ve Boyutları (The Right to Life and Its Dimensions). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları.
SENADO DE ESPAÑA (2025). BOCG-D-15-119-1339. Available at: https://www.senado.es/legis15/publicaciones/pdf/senado/bocg/BOCG_D_15_119_1339.PDF [Accessed 27 Apr. 2025].
SMARTT, U. (2006). Media Law for Journalists. California: SAGE Publications, p. 69.
STRUHKAMP, R. M. (2005). ‘Patient Autonomy: A View from the Kitchen’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 8(1), p. 105.
SULMASY, D. P. (2006). The Rebirth of the Clinic: An Introduction to Spirituality in Health Care. Georgetown University Press.
TEZCAN, D., ERDEM, M. R. and SANCAKDAR, O. (2004). Türkiye’nin İnsan Hakları Sorunu (Turkey’s Human Rights Issue). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
TRIBUNAL FÉDÉRAL SUISSE (2021). Arrêt du 6B_1187/2020 du 5 mai 2021. Available at: https://www.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/fr/php/aza/http/index.php?highlight_docid=aza%3A%2F%2Faza://6B_1187/2020&lang=fr&type=show_document [Accessed 23 Jun. 2025].
Tysiąc v. Poland, No. 5410/03, 20 March 2007. European Court of Justice. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-79812 [Accessed 29 Oct. 2025].
ULRICH, L. P. (2001). The Patient Self-Determination Act: Meeting Challenges in Health Care. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
WEAR, S. (1998). Informed Consent: Patient Autonomy and Clinician Beneficence Within Health Care. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, No. 6301/73 (1979). Amsterdam Declaration on the Promotion of Patients’ Rights in Europe. Consultation held in Amsterdam, March 28–30, 1994. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
X and Y v. The Netherlands, No. 8978/80, 26 March 1985. Available at: [Accessed 27 Apr. 2025]; see also Council of Europe (1985). Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights, p. 176.
YOUNG, R. (1986). Personal Autonomy: Beyond Negative and Positive Liberty. London: Taylor & Francis.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hamide Bagçeci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
