Indigenous Peoples and Climate Justice: Advisory Opinion 32/25 of the INTER-American Court of Human Rights and the Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Obligations of States in relation to Climate Change

Maria del Angel Iglesias

doi:10.17561/tahrj.v26.9818

Authors

Maria del Angel Iglesias UNIR Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v26.9818

Keywords:

Indigenous Peoples, Climate emergency, Climate change litigation, Eco-anxiety, Environmental democracy, Advisory Opinion OC-32/25

Abstract

This paper explores how two 2025 Advisory Opinions, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ OC-32/25 and the International Court of Justice’s opinion on climate change, address indigenous peoples’ rights. Both recognise climate change as an existential threat but adopt contrasting approaches. The ICJ portrays indigenous peoples as vulnerable communities, without differentiated standards. Conversely, the IACtHR promotes a pro persona perspective, incorporating environmental democracy into its climate reasoning, recognising eco-anxiety, and equating indigenous knowledge with scientific evidence. Through comparative and critical analysis, this paper argues that while the ICJ reinforces universal obligations, the Inter-American Opinion operationalises them, providing stronger protection for indigenous identity and territorial rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BASAURE MIRANDA, I. M. (2021). “El derecho a un medio ambiente sano en el sistema interamericano de derechos humanos”, Estudios de Deusto, 69(1), 141-63. https://doi.org/10.18543/ed-69(1)-2021

BODANSKY, D. (2016a). “The Legal Character of the Paris Agreement”, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, RECIEL, 25(2) 2016.

BODANSKY, D. (2016b). “The Paris Agreement: A New Hope?”, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 110, No. 2 (April 2016), pp. 288-319.

BODANSKY, D., BRUNNÉE, J. and RAJAMANI, L. (2017). “Paris Agreement”, International Climate Change Law (2017; online edn, Oxford Law Pro). https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199664290.003.0007

CASTILLO TORRES, S. E. (2012). “Reconocimiento y garantías del derecho a un ambiente sano y ecológicamente equilibrado”, LEX FACULTAD DE DERECHO Y CIENCIA POLÍTICA. Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Guantánamo.

GÓMEZ ISA, F. y URRUTIA, G. (eds.) (2025). Human Rights and defenders under siege. Elgar Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035355921.fm3

IGLESIAS VÁZQUEZ, M. A. (2021). “Los pueblos indígenas y la protección del medio ambiente: la indigenización del derecho internacional, los derechos bioculturales y los derechos de la naturaleza”, Cadernos de Direito Actual, 16, pp. 216-240.

INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (2023). Case of the Residents of La Oroya v. Peru. Judgment of November 27 (preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs).

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (2025). Advisory Opinion, 23 July. Obligations of States in respect of climate change.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (2025). Advisory Opinion, 23 July. Obligations of States in respect of climate change. Written Statement of the Melanesian Spearhead Group.

INTERNATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATION (1989). Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169).

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA, ITLOS (2024). Obligations of States to prevent, reduce and control marine pollution and to protect and preserve the marine ecosystem from the impacts of climate change. Advisory Opinion of 21 May 2024.

LÓPEZ ZAMORA, L. (2021). “Normative Perplexities and the Limits to the Advisory Powers of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights - Some Lessons from the Adoption of the Advisory Opinion Oc-23/17 on the Environment and Human Rights”, Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, Vol. 37.

SIWIOR, P. (2021). “The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment”, Review of European and Comparative Law, 46(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.11915

UNITED NATIONS (1987). General Assembly. Doc. Res A/42/427 of August 4, 1987 “Development and International Economic Cooperation: Environment. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Note by the Secretary-General”. Report “Our Common Future”.

UNITED NATIONS (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/observances/biological-diversity-day/convention

UNITED NATIONS (1992). Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Division for Sustainable Development. “Agenda 21”, Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/publications/agenda21

UNITED NATIONS (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from: https://unfccc.int/

UNITED NATIONS (1997). “Kyoto Protocol”. Framework Convention on Climate Change. FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1 10 December 1997. Retrieved from https://docs.un.org/en/FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1

UNITED NATIONS (2006). Human Rights Council. Resolution 1/2 of June 29, 2006. Official Records of the General Assembly, Sixty-first Session, Supplement No. 53 (A/61/53), Part One, chap. II, sect. A.

UNITED NATIONS (2007). General Assembly. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [without prior referral to a Main Committee (A/61/L.67 and Add.1)] 61/295, September 13, 2007. “United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples”.

UNITED NATIONS (2009). Human Rights Council. A/HRC/10/61, January 15, 2009, “Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the relationship between climate change and human rights”.

UNITED NATIONS (2015). OHCHR. Fact Sheet 10: “Indigenous peoples and the environment,” New York and Geneva, 2015.

UNITED NATIONS (2018). Escazú Agreement. United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 3388, C.N.195.2018.TREATIES-XXVII.18 of 9 April 2018 (Opening for signature) and C.N.196.2018.TREATIES-XXVII.18 of 9 April 2018 (Issuance of Certified True Copies).

UNITED NATIONS (2022). General Assembly. Doc. A/RES/76/300, August 1, 2022, “The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment”.

UNITED NATIONS (2023). General Assembly. Doc. A/RES/77/276, April 4, 2023, “Request for an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the obligations of States with regard to climate change”.

UNITED NATIONS (2025). UN News. April 25, 2025, “Human rights” (Last accessed 10/11/2015). Retrieved from https://news.un.org/es/story/2025/04/1538301

VITOLO, A. (2020). “El Valor de las Opiniones Consultivas de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos a la Luz de las OC-21/14 y 23/17 (El ‘Canto del Tero’ u ‘Otro Ladrillo más en la Pared de la Doctrina del ‘Control de Convencionalidad’)” Revista Jurídica Austral, 1(1), pp. 193 y ss.