Miscelánea

water and landscape
AGUA y TERRITORIO

Do pesticides and mycotoxins in water pose an exposure risk to humans?

¿Los pesticidas y las micotoxinas en el agua representan un riesgo de exposición para los humanos?

Wesclen Vilar Nogueira

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
wesclenvilar@gmail.com

ORCID: 0000-0002-9353-847X

Juliane Lima da Silva

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
julianelima@furg.br

ORCID: 0000-0002-8462-4683

Ediane Patrícia Pedrosa Braga

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
bragaep1@gmail.com

ORCID: 0009-0007-9750-9952

Larine Kupski

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
larinekupski@yahoo.com.br

ORCID: 0000-0002-6754-979X

Jaqueline Garda-Buffon

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
jaquelinebuffon@furg.br

ORCID: 0000-0002-7699-6217

Información del artículo

Recibido: 27/04/2023
Revisado: 05/09/2023
Aceptado: 08/12/2023
Online: 02/06/2024
Publicado: 10/01/2025

ISSN 2340-8472

ISSNe 2340-7743

DOI 10.17561/at.25.7926

cc-by

© Universidad de Jaen (Espana).
Seminario Permanente Agua, Territorio y Medio Ambiente (CSIC)

ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of pesticides and mycotoxins in water (e. g., drinking, well, tap and river water) published in the literature from 2008 to 2023 and to estimate the risks of exposure for humans to these contaminants through water consumption. An occurrence survey showed that maximum concentrations of pesticides and mycotoxins were 88,732 and 19,500 ng/L, respectively, in water. Exposure risk assessment estimated by daily intake (DI) of pesticides and mycotoxins showed that children, young people and adults, in descending order, are affected. Therefore, the younger the age group, the greater the exposure risk to contaminants when ingestion of water containing maximum concentrations was analyzed by the occurrence survey.

KEYWORDS: Children, Contaminants, Daily Intake, Water Consumption.

RESUMEN
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la presencia de pesticidas y micotoxinas en el agua (por ejemplo, agua potable, de pozo, del grifo y de río) publicada en la literatura de 2008 a 2023 y estimar los riesgos de exposición de los humanos a estos contaminantes a través del consumo de agua. Una encuesta de ocurrencia mostró que las concentraciones máximas de pesticidas y micotoxinas fueron 88.732 y 19.500 ng/L, respectivamente, en el agua. La evaluación del riesgo de exposición estimada por la ingesta diaria (ID) de pesticidas y micotoxinas mostró que los niños, jóvenes y adultos, en orden descendente, se ven afectados. Por lo tanto, cuanto más joven es el grupo de edad, mayor es el riesgo de exposición a contaminantes cuando se analiza la ingestión de agua que contiene concentraciones máximas mediante la encuesta de ocurrencia.

PALABRAS CLAVE: Niños, Contaminantes, Ingesta Diaria, Consumo de Agua.

Os pesticidas e micotoxinas na água representam um risco de exposição para os seres humanos?

RESUMO
Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a ocorrência de agrotóxicos e micotoxinas na água (e.g. potável, de poço, de torneira e de rio) publicada na literatura no período de 2008 a 2023 e estimar os riscos de exposição humana a esses contaminantes por meio do consumo de água. Um levantamento de ocorrência mostrou que as concentrações máximas de agrotóxicos e micotoxinas foram de 88732 e 19500 ng/L, respectivamente, na água. A avaliação do risco de exposição estimado pela ingestão diária (ID) de agrotóxicos e micotoxinas mostrou que crianças, jovens e adultos, em ordem decrescente, são afetados. Portanto, quanto menor a faixa etária, maior o risco de exposição a contaminantes quando a ingestão de água com concentrações máximas foi analisada pelo levantamento de ocorrência.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Crianças, Contaminantes, Ingestão Diária, Consumo de Água.

Les pesticides et les mycotoxines dans l’eau présentent-ils un risque d’exposition pour les humains?

RÉSUMÉ
Cette étude visait à évaluer la présence de pesticides et de mycotoxines dans l’eau (e.g. eau de boisson, de puits, du robinet et de rivière) publiée dans la littérature de 2008 à 2023 et à estimer les risques d’exposition pour l’homme à ces contaminants par la consommation d’eau. Une enquête d’occurrence a montré que les concentrations maximales de pesticides et de mycotoxines étaient respectivement de 88732 et 19500 ng/L dans l’eau. L’évaluation du risque d’exposition estimé par la dose journalière (DI) de pesticides et de mycotoxines a montré que les enfants, les jeunes et les adultes, par ordre décroissant, sont touchés. Par conséquent, plus le groupe d’âge est jeune, plus le risque d’exposition aux contaminants est élevé lorsque l’ingestion d’eau contenant des concentrations maximales a été analysée par l’enquête sur les occurrences.

MOTS CLÉ: Enfants, Contaminants, Apport Journalier, Consommation d’Eau.

I pesticidi e le micotossine nell’acqua rappresentano un rischio di esposizione per l’uomo?

SOMMARIO
Questo studio mirava a valutare la presenza di pesticidi e micotossine nell’acqua (ad es. acqua potabile, di pozzo, di rubinetto e di fiume) pubblicata in letteratura dal 2008 al 2023 e di stimare i rischi di esposizione per l’uomo a questi contaminanti attraverso il consumo di acqua. Un’indagine sugli eventi ha mostrato che le concentrazioni massime di pesticidi e micotossine erano rispettivamente di 88732 e 19500 ng/L nell’acqua. La valutazione del rischio di esposizione stimato in base all’assunzione giornaliera (DI) di pesticidi e micotossine ha mostrato che i bambini, i giovani e gli adulti, in ordine decrescente, ne sono colpiti. Pertanto, più giovane è la fascia di età, maggiore è il rischio di esposizione ai contaminanti quando l’ingestione di acqua contenente le concentrazioni massime è stata analizzata dall’indagine sull’occorrenza.

PAROLE CHIAVE: Bambini, Contaminanti, Assunzione Giornaliera, Consumo di Acqua.

Introduction

Population growth promotes the search for efficient production in agricultural sectors1. The use of chemicals, such as pesticides (e. g., fungicides, herbicides and insecticides), is one of the processes used for increasing agricultural production2. Inevitably, pesticides have been widely applied because they mitigate damage to crops caused by fungi, insects, weeds and other pests3. Fungi, which are responsible for causing between 50 and 80 % of crop damage, affect mainly grain production. Alternaria, Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium stand out among fungus genera due to their wide geographic distribution, morphological and physiological variability and pathogenicity4. However, pesticide application to control fungal diseases may affect and, in some cases, potentiate mycotoxin production by toxigenic microorganisms5.

Another important issue is the fate of pesticides and mycotoxins when they are in the agricultural production chain. Pesticides have been widely studied due to their high toxicity, chemical stability and environmental persistence6. Since they are directly applied to the environment, studies have focused on environmental matrices and produced knowledge about their fate and partitioning between environmental compartments. On the other hand, mycotoxins are known for their resistance to physical and chemical treatments in food matrices and little is known about their environmental fate in environmental compartments6. Thus, environmental fate of these contaminants is determined by their physicochemical properties, which may allow greater solubility and mobility. As a result, they may be drained and/or leached and spread through the water environment7.

The World Health Organization (WHO)8 reports that one out of three people in the world does not have access to potable water. In rural areas, this number is even higher, i. e., 8 out of 10 people do not have potable water. They use water from wells (e. g., shallow or artesian wells) or directly from rivers, with high potential of contamination with pesticides and mycotoxins. Thus, this study aimed at evaluating data on the occurrence of pesticides and mycotoxins in water (e. g., drinking, river, tap and well water) published in the literature and at estimating exposure risks to these contaminants through water consumption associated with described incidence.

Material and methods

Research strategy and data sources

Search for data on the occurrence of pesticides and mycotoxins in water was carried out in electronic databases, including Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed and Scopus. The following keywords were used: “occurrence” or “concentration” or “contamination” and “pesticides” or “acaricide” or “bactericide” or “defoliants” or “fungicide” or “herbicide” or “insecticide” or “molluscicides” or “rodenticides” or “crop protection” or “agrochemicals” and “mycotoxins” or “secondary metabolites” and “water” or “drinking water” or “bottled water” or “river” or “wastewater” or “surface water” or “leach” and “continent” or “Africa” or “America” or “Asia” or “Europe” or “Oceania”. In the search strategy, all keywords were associated with primary results to minimize losses of studies. In addition, to complement the automatic search, all references of selected papers and review papers were evaluated in order to find other relevant studies.

Eligibility criteria

To be included in this study of the occurrence of pesticides and mycotoxins, papers should meet the following criteria: (i) uniterms mentioned in the previous item included in the title, abstract or keywords; (ii) data on occurrence of pesticides and/or mycotoxins in water; (iii) published between 2008 and 2023; and (iv) availability of complete data. There were no restrictions regarding the language of the studies. On the other hand, short communications, letters, comments and abstracts in conference proceedings were excluded from the selection.

Exposure risk estimate

Daily intake (DI) is generally used for estimating human exposure to a given contaminant. Thus, DI of pesticides and mycotoxins were estimated by Equation 1, where DI is expressed as µg/kg per day, C is the highest level of contamination of every pesticide and mycotoxin in water in the occurrence survey (µg/L), WI is the average water intake (L/day) (for children, young people and adults, values of 1, 1.5 and 2 L, respectively, were assumed), EF is the exposure frequency (350 days/year), EL is exposure length (for children, young people and adults, values of 6, 17 and 64 years, respectively, were assumed), BW is body mass (for children, young people and adults, values of 32, 52, 72 kg, respectively, were assumed) and AT is average life expectancy (for children, young people and adults, values of 2,190, 6,205 and 23,360 days, respectively, were assumed)9.

DI=C*WI*EF*ELBW*AT                     (1)

DI calculations were established for drinking, tap, well and river water to demonstrate the quality of this resource in relation to the presence of pesticides and mycotoxins. DI values were compared to reference values and provisional values established by the WHO10.

Development

Occurrence of pesticides and mycotoxins in water

In the field, the synthesis of mycotoxins may be related to chemical stress that pesticides may cause to fungal species11, which may positively influence concentrations of these metabolites in products from the agricultural production chain12. Ellner13 found that the use of amistar and folicur, pesticides containing strobilurins, potentiated the synthesis of deoxynivalenol (DON) in wheat cultivars. The author describes that the synthesis of DON is independent of the cultivar and time of application of fungicides. In addition, he states that DON synthesis was lower when fungicide application occurred close to flowering, by comparison with the early treatment. Similar behavior was observed by Feksa et al.14 when they evaluated the use of azoxystrobin to control Gibberella in wheat grains. The authors report that the use of azoxystrobin, a pesticide that also contains strobilurins, reduced fungal contamination with increase in DON concentration in grains.

Bellí et al.15 found that the use of fenhexamide and mancozeb increased production of ochratoxin A (OTA) in grapevines in 50 and 80 %, respectively. Costa, Cerqueira and Garda-Buffon16 evaluated the in vitro toxigenic potential of Aspergillus carbonarius in the presence of famoxadone and cresoxim-methyl. The authors found that famoxadone and cresoxim-methyl reduced fungal growth in 76 and 60 %, respectively. However, OTA production doubled in the groups treated with both fungicides, by comparison with the control group.

Despite the scarce number of studies that report increase in mycotoxin synthesis with the use of pesticides, this effect may be observed in several mycotoxins and in different agricultural cultivars. It is justified because some species of toxigenic fungi are able to produce several mycotoxins when subject to stressful situations17. Even though some toxigenic species belonging to Aspergillus and Penicillium are able to synthesize OTA, they also produce aflatoxins, such as aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), the mycotoxin with the highest toxic potential among aflatoxins18, classified as carcinogenic for animals and humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer19. Production of several mycotoxins by the same fungal genus is related to the fact that they have high adaptive capacity to environments and substrates that they colonize, even when they have low water activity20.

The presence of these contaminants is considered a challenge for quality control and safety in food production in all agricultural production chains. It is noteworthy that around 90 % of pesticides applied to crops does not reach target organisms. Pesticides may be retained in the soil or grains, subject to degradation in different chemical forms, thus, collaborating with fungal stress and enabling greater synthesis of mycotoxins in commodities21. The problem related to increase in synthesis of mycotoxins by use of pesticides is not only restricted to the cultivation system. Because they have hydrophilic characteristics, some pesticides and mycotoxins may be disposed of from agricultural fields through the process of leaching and surface runoff, a fact that contributes to their increasingly occurrence in surface and groundwater, including drinking water intended for human consumption (Table 1 and Table 2).

Table 1. Occurrence of pesticides in water

Matrix

Pesticide (CF in ng/L)

Country

Reference

Drinking water

ATZ (0–4)

Luxembourg

25

Drinking water

IMD (1.22-26.36), CLO (3.89-33.46) and THM (0.26-4.14)

United States

26

Drinking water

IMD (ND-4.8), THD (ND-2.7) and THM (ND-91.7)

Canada

27

Drinking water

ATZ (5-37), AZO (100-192), BEN (30-30), CAR (20-50), CMZ (40-164), CYP (10-14), DIU (40-490), EPX (70-70), IMI (12-15), IMA (12-37), IRG (4-4), PRP (10-10), QUC (124-248) and TBZ (40-460)

Brazil

28

Tap water

ATZ (0–44)

Luxembourg

29

Tap water

FIP (<0.1-5) and IMD (<0.1-0.2)

Canada

30

Tap water

ACE (<0.002-69.2), CLO (<0.005-104), DIN (<0.003-312), IMD (<0.02-68.3), THD (<0.002-74.2) and THM (<0.03-214)

China

31

River water

ATZ (100-7300)

United States

32

River water

DIU (ND-86.7), DIN (ND-1.6) and IMI (ND-35.3)

Georgia

33

River water

ACE (ND-1.4), CLO (ND-12), DIN (3.7-100), IMD (ND-25) and THM (ND-11)

Japan

34

River water

IMD (5-28000)

Netherlands

35

River water

ACE (ND-380), CLO (ND-420), IMD (ND-4560), THD (ND-400) and THM (ND-200)

Australia

36

River water

FIP (0.24–0.92), FIPD (<0,08- 0,37) and FIPS (0.16–0.39)

Germany

37

River water

2,4-D (2625-88732), ATZ (80-10560), CBD (20-1396), EPX (50-261), IMD (20-1437), PRO (20-130), MEM (2-29), MTR (200-421), NIC (7-175), PRS (4-12), SIM (50-2905), TBZ (15-737), THI (36-79)

Brazil

38

River water

ACE (0.62-308.96), CLO (ND-12.78), DIN (ND-6.2), IMD (0.03-30.78), NIT (ND-5.31), THD (ND-0.93) and THM (ND-9.69)

China

39

Well water

DIC (ND-69), FEB (ND-110), FEN (2-476) and IMD (nd-153)

Vietnam

40

Well water

CHL (5-32), IMD (17-43), ISO (7-18), MZC (15-15) and NIC (12-30)

Poland

41

2,4-D = 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, ACE = acetamiprid, ATZ = atrazine, AZO = azoxystrobin, BEN = bentazone, CAR = carbofuran, CBD = carbendazim, CF = contamination range, CHL = chlorotoluron, CLO = clothianidin, CMZ = clomazone, CYP = cyproconazole, DIC = dichlorvos, DIN = dinotefuran, DIU = diuron, EPX = epoxiconazole, FEB = fenobucarb, FEN = fenitrothion, FIP = fipronil, FIPD = fipronil-desulfinyl, FIPS = fipronil-sulfone, IMD = imidacloprid, IMA = imazethapyr, IMI = imazapic, IRG = irgarol, ISO = Isoproturon, ND = not detected, MEM = mesosulfuron-methyl, MTR = mesotrione, MZC = metazachlor, NIC = nicosulfuron, NIT = nitenpyram, PRO = propuxur, PRP = propanil, PRS = prosulfuron, QUC = quinclorac, SIM = simazine, TBZ = tebuconazole, THD = thiacloprid, THI = thifensulfuron-methyl, THM = thiamethoxam.
Source: own elaboration.

Table 2. Occurrence of mycotoxins in water

Matrix

Mycotoxin (CF in ng/L)

Country

Reference

Drinking water

AFB1 (0.22-0.70), AFB2 (0.16-0.48), AFG1 (0.42-0.60) and OTA (0.22-0.26)

Portugal

42

Drinking water

AFB1 (0.052-0.075)

India

43

Drinking water

AFB1 (260-470) and KJA (300-4100)

Spain

44

Tap water

3-ADON (18.74-145.69), 15-ADON (15.14-71.61), AFB1 (3.083-3.083), AFM1 (0.099-0.099), AFG1 (0.013-0.013), AFG2 (3.05-3.18), DON (8.40-71.61) and STC (0.223-0.223)

South Africa

45

Tap water

AFB1 (200-19500) and OTA (300-14400)

Egypt

46

River water

DON (ND-22)

Switzerland

47

River water

ZEN (0.7-43.7)

Poland

48

River water

DON (11-583) and ZEN (8-47)

United States

49

River water

ZEN (2-25)

Poland

50

River water

3-ADON (ND-49.3), α-ZEL (ND-1701), β-ZEL (ND-1828), DON (5-1662), NIV (ND-43.7), VERA (ND-42.3) and ZEN (ND-96)

United States

51

River water

ZEN (17-17) and β-ZEL (168-168)

Brazil

52

Well water

ZEN (<0.3-0.5)

Poland

53

3-ADON = 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, 15-ADON = 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol, α-ZEL = α-zearalenol, β-ZEL = β-zearalenol, AFB1 = Aflatoxin B1, AFB2 = Aflatoxin B2, AFG1 = Aflatoxin G1, AFM1 = Aflatoxin M1, BEA = beauvericin, CF = contamination range, DON = deoxynivalenol, FB1 = fumonisin B1, FB2 = fumonisin B2, FB3 = fumonisin B3, KJA = kojic acid, ND = not detected, NIV = nivalenol, STC = terigmatocystin, VERA = verrucarin A, ZEN = zearalenone.
Source: own elaboration.

The occurrence survey in Table 1 shows that IMD has higher occurrence in different matrices, followed by THM and CLO. IMD has higher occurrence than other pesticides when matrices are evaluated individually. In Table 2, ZEN has the highest occurrence in different matrices, followed by DON and AFB1. AFB1 has higher occurrence in drinking and tap water while ZEN occurs in river water. In well water, a single study reports the occurrence of a single mycotoxin, ZEN. Kolpin et al.22 were the only authors to report the co-occurrence of ATZ, DON and ZEN in river water samples. Contamination of water bodies with pesticides and mycotoxins through leaching may be considered a problem, especially in tropical and equatorial regions, where there is high rainfall23. Considering that water is an important route of exposure to various contaminants for humans and that conventional water treatment processes are not 100 % effective, contamination of water resources has become a worldwide concern due to the toxic effects that they may cause24.

Estimate of risk to human health due to consumption of water with pesticides and mycotoxins

Humans are constantly exposed to various toxic chemicals in food and drink consumed on a daily basis. Therefore, considering that water is essential for life, estimating the risk to human health caused by contaminants is important to support actions that guarantee its safe supply to the population. In the case of pesticides and mycotoxins in water, DI estimates concentrations of these contaminants that different age groups are exposed to daily. The highest DIs of pesticides and mycotoxins were in a descending order for children, young people and adults (Table 3). Thus, young individuals are exposed to higher concentrations of pesticides and mycotoxins when they drink water at concentrations analyzed by the occurrence survey.

Table 3. Estimated daily intake (DI) (µg/kg) of pesticides and mycotoxins in terms of maximum concentrations in water

Pesticide

Age group

DI (µg/kg)

Drinking water

Tap water

Well water

River water

2,4-D

Child

*

*

*

2.6589

Young

*

*

*

0.0735

Adult

*

*

*

0.0020

ACE

Child

*

0.0021

*

0.0114

Young

*

5.74E-5

*

0.0003

Adult

*

1.53E-6

*

8.39E-6

ATZ

Child

0.0011

0.0013

*

0.3164

Young

3.07E-5

3.65E-5

*

0.0088

Adult

8.17E-7

9.71E-7

*

0.0002

AZO

Child

0.0058

*

*

*

Young

0.0002

*

*

*

Adult

4.24E-6

*

*

*

BEM

Child

0.0009

*

*

*

Young

2.49E-5

*

*

*

Adult

6.62E-7

*

*

*

CAR

Child

0.0015

*

*

*

Young

4.14E-5

*

*

*

Adult

1.10E-6

*

*

*

CBD

Child

*

*

*

0.0418

Young

*

*

*

0.0012

Adult

*

*

*

3.08E-5

CHL

Child

*

*

0.0010

*

Young

*

*

2.65E-5

*

Adult

*

*

7.06E-7

*

CLO

Child

0.0010

0.0031

*

0.0126

Young

2.77E-5

8.62E-5

*

0.0003

Adult

7.39E-7

2.30E-6

*

9.27E-6

CMZ

Child

0.0049

*

*

*

Young

0.0001

*

*

*

Adult

3.62E-6

*

*

*

CYP

Child

0.0004

*

*

*

Young

1.15E-5

*

*

*

Adult

3.09E-7

*

*

*

DIC

Child

*

*

0.0021

*

Young

*

*

5.72E-5

*

Adult

*

*

1.52E-6

*

DIN

Child

*

0.0093

*

0.0030

Young

*

0.0003

*

8.29E-5

Adult

*

6.89E-6

*

2.21E-6

DIU

Child

0.0147

*

*

0.0026

Young

0.0004

*

*

7.19E-5

Adult

1.08E-5

*

*

1.91E-6

EPX

Child

0.0021

*

*

0.0078

Young

5.80E-5

*

*

0.0002

Adult

1.55E-6

*

*

5.76E-6

FEB

Child

*

*

0.0033

*

Young

*

*

9.12E-5

*

Adult

*

*

2.43E-6

*

FEN

Child

*

*

0.0143

*

Young

*

*

0.0004

*

Adult

*

*

1.05E-5

*

FIP

Child

*

0.0001

*

2.76E-5

Young

*

4.14E-6

*

7.63E-7

Adult

*

1.10E-7

*

2.03E-8

FPID

Child

*

*

*

1.11E-5

Young

*

*

*

3.07E-7

Adult

*

*

*

8.17E-9

FIPS

Child

*

*

*

1.17E-5

Young

*

*

*

3.23E-7

Adult

*

*

*

8.61E-9

IMA

Child

0.0004

*

*

*

Young

1.24E-5

*

*

*

Adult

3.31E-7

*

*

*

IMD

Child

0.0008

0.0020

0.0046

0.8390

Young

2.18E-5

5.66E-5

0.0001

0.0232

Adult

5.82E-7

1.51E-6

3.38E-6

0.0006

IMI

Child

*

*

*

0.0011

Young

*

*

*

2.93E-5

Adult

*

*

*

7.79E-7

IRG

Child

0.0001

*

*

*

Young

3.32E-6

*

*

*

Adult

8.83E-8

*

*

*

ISSO

Child

*

*

0.0005

*

Young

*

*

1.49E-5

*

Adult

*

*

3.97E-7

*

MEM

Child

*

*

*

0.0009

Young

*

*

*

2.40E-5

Adult

*

*

*

6.4E-7

MTR

Child

*

*

*

0.0126

Young

*

*

*

0.0003

Adult

*

*

*

9.29E-6

MZC

Child

*

*

0.0004

*

Young

*

*

1.24E-5

*

Adult

*

*

3.31E-7

*

NIC

Child

*

*

0.0009

0.0052

Young

*

*

2.49E-5

0.0001

Adult

*

*

6.62E-7

3.86E-6

NIT

Child

*

*

*

0.0002

Young

*

*

*

4.40E-6

Adult

*

*

*

1.17E-7

PRO

Child

*

*

*

0.0039

Young

*

*

*

0.0001

Adult

*

*

*

2.87E-6

PRP

Child

0.0003

*

*

*

Young

8.29E-6

*

*

*

Adult

2.21E-7

*

*

*

PRS

Child

*

*

*

0.0004

Young

*

*

*

9.95E-6

Adult

*

*

*

2.65E-7

QUC

Child

0.0074

*

*

*

Young

0.0002

*

*

*

Adult

5.48E-6

*

*

*

SIM

Child

*

*

*

0.0628

Young

*

*

*

0.0017

Adult

*

*

*

4.63E-5

TBZ

Child

0.0138

*

*

0.0221

Young

0.0004

*

*

0.0006

Adult

1.02E-5

*

*

1.63E-5

THD

Child

8.09E-5

0.0022

*

0.0120

Young

2.24E-6

6.15E-5

*

0.0003

Adult

5.96E-8

1.64E-6

*

8.83E-6

THI

Child

*

*

*

0.0024

Young

*

*

*

6.55E-5

Adult

*

*

*

1.74E-6

THM

Child

0.0027

0.0064

*

0.0060

Young

7.60E-5

0.0002

*

0.0002

Adult

2.02E-6

4.72E-6

*

4.42E-6

Mycotoxin

Age group

DI (µg/kg)

Drinking water

Tap water

Well water

River water

3-ADON

Child

*

0.0044

*

0.0015

Young

*

0.0001

*

4.09E-5

Adult

*

3.22E-6

*

1.09E-6

15-ADON

Child

*

0.0021

*

*

Young

*

5.94E-5

*

*

Adult

*

1.58E-6

*

*

α-ZEL

Child

*

*

*

0.0510

Young

*

*

*

0.0014

Adult

*

*

*

3.76E-5

β-ZEL

Child

*

*

*

0.0548

Young

*

*

*

0.0015

Adult

*

*

*

4.04E-5

AFB1

Child

0.0141

0.5843

*

*

Young

0.0004

0.0162

*

*

Adult

1.04E-5

0.0004

*

*

AFB2

Child

1.44E-5

*

*

*

Young

3.98E-7

*

*

*

Adult

1.06E-8

*

*

*

AFG1

Child

1.80E-5

3.90E-7

*

*

Young

4.97E-7

1.08E-8

*

*

Adult

1.32E-8

2.87E-10

*

*

AFG2

Child

*

9.53E-5

*

*

Young

*

2.64E-6

*

*

Adult

*

7.02E-8

*

*

AFM1

Child

*

2.97E-6

*

*

Young

*

8.21E-8

*

*

Adult

*

2.19E-9

*

*

DON

Child

*

0.0021

*

0.0498

Young

*

5.94E-5

*

0.0014

Adult

*

1.58E-6

*

3.67E-5

KJA

Child

0.1229

*

*

*

Young

0.0034

*

*

*

Adult

9.05E-5

*

*

*

NIV

Child

*

*

*

0.0013

Young

*

*

*

3.63E-5

Adult

*

*

*

9.65E-7

OTA

Child

7.79E-6

0.4315

*

*

Young

2.16E-7

0.0119

*

*

Adult

5.74E-9

0.0003

*

*

STC

Child

*

6.68E-6

*

*

Young

*

1.85E-7

*

*

Adult

*

4.92E-9

*

*

VERA

Child

*

*

*

0.0013

Young

*

*

*

3.51E-5

Adult

*

*

*

9.34E-7

ZEN

Child

*

*

1.50E-5

0.0029

Young

*

*

4.14E-7

7.96E-5

Adult

*

*

1.10E-8

2.12E-6

* = not reported by the occurrence survey.
Source: own elaboration.

Regarding pesticides, the highest DIs (children/young people/adults) were observed for 2,4-D (2.6589/0.0735/0.0020 µg/kg), IMD (0.8390/0.0232/0.0006 µg/kg) and ATZ (0.3168/0.0088 /0.0002 µg/kg) in river water, followed by IUD (0.0147/0.0004/1.08E-05 µg/kg), TBZ (0.0138/0.0004/1.02E-5 µg/kg) and QUC (0.0074/0.0002/5.48 E-6 µg/kg) in drinking water, DIN (0.0093/0.0003/6.89E-6 µg/kg), THM (0.0022/6.15E-5/1.64E-6 µg/kg) and CLO (0.0031/8.62 E-5/2.30E-6 µg/kg) in tap water and FEN (0.0143/0.0004/1.05E-5 µg/kg), IMD (0.0046/0.0001/0.38E-6 µg/kg) and FEB (0.0033 /9.12E-5/2.43E-6 µg/kg) in well water. Concerning mycotoxins, the highest IDs were observed for AFB1 (0.5843/0.0162/0.004 µg/kg), OTA (0.4315/0.0119/0.0003 µg/kg) and 3-ADON (0.0044/0.0001/3.22E-6 µg/kg) in tap water, followed by KJA (0.1229/0.0034/9.05E-5 µg/kg), AFB1 (0.0141/0.0004/1.04E-5 µg/kg) and AFG1 (1.80E-5/ 4.97E-7/1.32 E-8 µg/kg) in drinking water, β-ZEL (0.0548/0.0015/4.04E-5 µg/kg), α-ZEL (0.0510/0.0014/3.76E-5 µg/kg) and DON (0.0498/0.0014 /3.67E-5 µg/kg) in river water and ZEN (1.50E-5/4.14E-7/1.10E-8 µg/kg) in well water. DIs did not represent any exposure risk, according to the WHO54. However, tolerable daily intake (TDI), i.e., concentrations that can be ingested without risk to health and with a safety margin, established by the WHO are defined only for ATZ, BEM, CAR, CHL, 2,4-D, DIC, ISO and SIM in potable water. i. e., 20, 9, 2, 11300, 10, 4, 3 and 0.52 µg/kg, respectively. The other pesticides reported in the occurrence survey had no established reference values of TDI. Regarding mycotoxins, no legislation establishes TDI values related to water consumption.

According to WHO55, DI values of pesticides calculated do not pose any exposure risk. In the case of mycotoxins, it is important to say that the European Commission warns that AFB1 consumption of concentrations below 1 ng/kg/day may cause carcinogenic effects56. Additionally, their incidence in water at low concentrations without any acute toxic effect, bioaccumulation in the food chain and simultaneous ingestion of these contaminants may result in toxic synergism. Michel et al.57 verified not only the occurrence of FIP and its metabolites FIPD and FIPS in river water samples but also their occurrence in muscle tissue of eels captured downstream from collection spots of water samples. FIP was predominant in all water samples at concentrations ranging from 0.24 to 0.92 ng/L, followed by FIPS, from 0.16 to 0.39 ng/L, and FIPD, from <0.08 to 0.37 ng /L. In muscle samples, concentrations of FIP, FIPD and FIPS ranged from 0.04 to 0.32, 0.02 to 0.13 and 0.52 to 11.24 µg/kg, respectively. Gonkowski et al.58 evaluated the occurrence of ZEN and its metabolites α-ZEL and β-ZEL in dry fish and in river water where the species was captured. Data on ZEN levels in dry fish ranged from 27.2 to 53.9 μg/kg and <2000 to 18000 ng/L in water. In both studies, the authors concluded that these contaminants may contribute to consumers’ exposure and lead to public health problems.

Other studies also report bioaccumulation of pesticides carbaryl, famoxadone, fenpyroximate, thiamethoxam, boscalid and difenoconazole in ground beef at concentrations ranging from 10 to 20 μg/kg59, chlorpyrifos (1000 μg/kg) and phenthoate (5 μg/kg) in animal fat60 and 2,4-D (13400-26300 μg/kg) in fish meat61. Concerning mycotoxins enniatin A1 (1.7-29 μg/kg) enniatin B (1.3-103 μg/kg), enniatin B1 (1.4-94 μg/kg)62 and AFB1, their bioaccumulation was reported in fish muscle (0-264.73 µg/kg)63, AFB1 (40-600 ng/L) and AFM1 (40-3670 ng/L) in milk64, AFM1 (0.20-1.19 µg/kg) in powdered milk65, OTA (0.3-1.9 µg /kg) and ZEN (5-317.3 µg/kg) in seafood66.

Many contaminants have chemical structures that, after injection, interact with cellular organelles and macromolecules and induce toxic effects in mammals (e.g., cytotoxic, estrogenic, immunosuppressive, nephrotoxic, neurotoxic and carcinogenic)67. In addition, some pesticides may reduce intelligence and impair short-term memory, especially in children and adolescents68. It is noteworthy that, the higher the DIs of pesticides and mycotoxins in river water, followed by tap water, the more exposed to their negative effects is the population that uses this resource.

Thus, risks to human health posed by consumption of water contaminated with pesticides and mycotoxins cannot be ignored. However, their control has several challenges, such as different groups of pollutants that require distinct chemical processes, remediation technologies and objective treatment. Therefore, specific legislation that determines the lowest concentrations of the metabolites in water which does not cause any adverse effects must be established. Thus, regulatory agencies of each country establish guidelines on water quality parameters for consumption by its human population69. The WHO also establish its guidelines for drinking water quality70.

In addition, effective strategies to control or mitigate them must be developed and applied so that effective treatments may decrease adverse effects on humans. Physical, chemical, and biological methods have been applied to mitigate these contaminants in liquid matrices, such as the application of UV light radiation to mitigate aflatoxin M1 in milk71, ozone to mitigate patulin in apple juice72 and the enzyme peroxidase to mitigate OTA and ZEA in beer73, respectively. For pesticides, the best results are achieved by chemical method using photocatalysis resulting in 100 % degradation of monocrotophos in water74. In relation to the physical method, the best result is reached by reverse osmosis membrane and bio-filtration methodology with degradation value of 97 %75, while the biological method that has the best result is the hybrid membrane bioreactor treatment, which reached 99 % degradation76.

All methods (e.g., chemical, physical and biological ones) have good efficiency at mitigating mycotoxins and good variability in application because, even when methodologies are applied to several mycotoxins, mitigation ranged from 27 to 100 %77. Although there are no studies of degradation and mitigation of mycotoxins in environmental matrices, the methods presented can be the starting point for applications to water.

Conclusion

A large variety of pesticides and mycotoxins may be detected in drinking, waste, river and tap water. Data compilation from the literature and assessment of DI enabled to state that young individuals are exposed to higher concentrations of both groups of contaminants. In addition, the highest DI was observed in river water, followed by tap water. It means that the population that drinks water from these sources is more exposed to the deleterious effects of the contaminants. Even though intake values are below those established by the WHO for pesticides, their simultaneous ingestion may result in bioaccumulation in the food chain and in toxic synergism. To circumvent this problem and risk of exposure, it’s necessary that studies aiming at the degradation of mycotoxins and pesticides in water be carried out. Physical, chemical and biological methods can be tested, with or without a combination of them, and applied to minimize contamination and increase water quality, ensuring safe water for animals and humans. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the need to establish concentrations that can be ingested without health risks for mycotoxins and also for the pesticides that do not contain them.

References

Al-Amri, Issa S.; Kadim, Isam; AlKindi, Abdulaziz; Hamaed, Ahmed; Al-Magbali, Rabea; Khalaf, Samera; Al-Hosni, Khdija; Mabood, Fazal. 2021: “Determination of residues of pesticides, anabolic steroids, antibiotics, and antibacterial compounds in meat products in Oman by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay”. Veterinary World, 14(3), 709-720. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.709-720

Banu, Narasimhan; Sadagopan, Pavithra. 2016: “Enumeration of terrestrial mycobiota and aflatoxin in drinking water”. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology & Environmental Sciences, 18(1), 207-217.

Bellí, Neus; Marín, Sonia; Sanchis, Vicent; Ramos, Antonio. 2006: “Impact of fungicides on Aspergillus carbonarius growth and ochratoxin A production on synthetic grape-like medium and on grapes”. Food Additives & Contaminants, 23(10), 1021-1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030600778702

Bohn, Torsten; Cocco, Emmanuelle; Gourdol, Laurent; Guignard, Cédric; Hoffmann, Lucien. 2011: “Determination of atrazine and degradation products in Luxembourgish drinking water: origin and fate of potential endocrine-disrupting pesticides”. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 28(8), 1041-1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2011.580012

Bosch, Lars T.; Pfohl, Katharina; Avramidis, Georg; Wieneke, Stephan; Viöl, Wolfgang; Karlovsky, Petr. 2017: “Plasma-based degradation of mycotoxins produced by Fusarium, Aspergillus and Alternaria Species”. Toxins, 9, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9030097

Brasil. 2021: Ministério da Saúde, Portaria MS n.° 888. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2021/prt0888_07_05_2021.html

Bucheli, Thomas D.; Wettstein, Felix E.; Hartmann, Niccolo; Erbs, Marianne; Vogelgsang, Susanne; Forrer, Hans-Rudolf; Schwarzenbach, René P. 2008: “Fusarium mycotoxins: overlooked aquatic micropollutants?”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56, 1029-1034. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf073082k

Caldas, Sergiane S.; Arias, Jean Lucas O.; Rombaldi, Caroline; Mello, Lucas L.; Cerqueira, Maristela B. R.; Martins, Ayrton F.; Primel, Ednei G. 2019: “Occurrence of pesticides and PPCPs in surface and drinking water in southern Brazil: data on 4-year monitoring”. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 30(1), 71-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20180154

Çelik, Ayla; Belli, İdil; Koçak, Emek. 2022: “Genotoxicity of quizalofop-p-ethyl on Vicia faba root cells micronucleus induction and mitotic index”. Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Engineering, Natural & Medical Sciences, 9(23), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7130682

Chen, Lu; Qian, Yong Z.; Jia, Qi; Weng, Rui; Zhang, Xinglian; Li, Yun; Qiu, Jing. 2023: “A national-scale distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in cropland soils and major types of food crops in China: co-occurrence and associated risks”. Science of The Total Environment, 861, 160637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160637

China. 2006: Ministry of Health of China National Standard of the People’s republic of China GB 5749-2006, 2006. http://tradechina.dairyaustralia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/GB-5749-2006-Standards-for-Drinking-Water-Quality.pdf

Costa, Carmen L. A.; Cerqueira, Maristela B. R.; Garda-Buffon, Jaqueline. 2019: “Kresoxim-methyl and famoxadone as activators of toxigenic potential of Aspergillus carbonarius”. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 36(12), 1860-1870. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2019.1670869

Deng, Yijia; Deng, Qi; Wang, Yaling; Sun, Lijun; Wang, Rundong; Ye, Lin; Liao, Jianmeng; Gooneratne, Ravi. (2020). “Tolerance and bio-accumulation of aflatoxin B1 in invertebrate Litopenaeus vannamei and vertebrate Oreochromis niloticus”. Aquaculture, 524, 735055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735055

Diab, Hassan M.; Ahmed, Ahmed M.; Alkazmi, Luay M. M. A; Batiha, Gaber E.; El-Zamkan, Mona A. 2021: “Antifungal disinfectants efficiency on aspergillus strains from camel’s milk and drinking water: biological detoxification of aflatoxin M1”. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal, 67(171), 75-102. https://doi.org/10.21608/avmj.2021.205248

Diao, Enjie; Wang, Jiasheng; Li, Xiangyang; Wang, Xinfeng; Song, Huwei; Gao, Dongsheng. 2019: “Effects of ozone processing on patulin, phenolic compounds and organic acids in apple juice”. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 56, 957-965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-03561-0

Dijk, Tessa C. V.; Staalduinen, Marja A. V.; Sluijs, Jeroen P. V. 2013: “Macro-invertebrate decline in surface water polluted with imidacloprid”. Plos One, 8(5), e62374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062374

Dudziak, Mariusz. 2012: “Removal of zearalenone from water by means of ozonation and integrated system of ozonation/nanofiltration”. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering A, 19(7), 779-785. https://doi.org/10.2428/ecea.2012.19(07)077

Eagles, Emily J.; Benstead, Rachel; MacDonald, Susan; Handy, Richard D.; Hutchinson, Thomas H. 2021: “Environmental risks to freshwater organisms from the mycotoxins deoxynivalenol and zearalenone using Species Sensitivity Distributions”. Chemosphere, 267, 129279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129279

Elfikrie, Nurulizani; Ho, Yu B.; Zaidon, Siti Z.; Juahir, Hafizan; Tan, Eugenie S. S. 2020: “Occurrence of pesticides in surface water, pesticides removal efficiency in drinking water treatment plant and potential health risk to consumers in Tengi River Basin, Malaysia”. Science of The Total Environment, 712, 136540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136540

Ellner, Frank M. 2005: “Results of long-term field studies into the effect of strobilurin containing fungicides on the production of mycotoxins in several winter wheat varieties”. Mycotoxin Research, 21, 112-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02954432

El-Nahhal, Ibrahim; El-Nahhal, Yasser Z. 2021: “Pesticide residues in drinking water, their potential risk to human health and removal options”. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113611

Emídio, Elissandro S.; Silva, Claudia P.; Marchi, Mary R. R. 2015: “Determination of estrogenic mycotoxins in environmental water samples by low-toxicity dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry”. Journal of Chromatography A, 1391, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.02.067

European Commission. 1996: Food science and techniques: reports if the scientific committee for food. Brussels (Belgium), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

European Union. 2020: Directive (EU) 2020/2184 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Union, 1-62. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2020/2184/oj

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2022: The State of Food and Agriculture. Rome (Italy). https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9479en

Feksa, Heraldo R.; Couto, Hilton T. Z.; Garozi, Renato; Almeida, Juliano L.; Gardiano, Cristiane G.; Tessmann, Dauri J. 2019: “Pre- and postinfection application of strobilurin-triazole premixes and single fungicides for control of Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol mycotoxin in wheat”. Crop Protection, 117, 128-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.12.003

Fernandes, Gracieli; Aparicio, Virginia C.; Bastos, Marilia C.; Gerónimo, Eduardo; Labanowski, Jérôme; Prestes, Osmar D.; Zanella, Renato; Santos, Danilo R. 2019: “Indiscriminate use of glyphosate impregnates river epilithic biofilms in southern Brazil”. Science of The Total Environment, 651(1), 1377-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.292

Garcia, Sabrina O.; Sibaja, Karen V. M.; Nogueira, Wesclen V.; Feltrin, Ana C. P.; Pinheiro, Diean F. A.; Cerqueira, Maristela B. R.; Furlong, Eliana B.; Garda-Buffon, Jaqueline. 2020: “Peroxidase as a simultaneous degradation agent of ochratoxin A and zearalenone applied to model solution and beer”. Food Research International, 131, 109039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109039

Gonçalves, Keven D. M.; Sibaja, Karen V. M.; Feltrin, Ana C. P.; Remedi, Rafael D.; Garcia, Sabrina O.; Garda-Buffon, Jaqueline. 2018: “Occurrence of aflatoxins B1 and M1 in milk powder and UHT consumed in the city of Assomada (Cape Verde Islands) and southern Brazil”. Food Control, 93, 260-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.06.010

Gonkowski, Slawomir; Obremski, Kazimierz; Makowska, Krystyna; Rytel, Liliana; Mwaanga, Edwell, S. 2018: “Levels of zearalenone and its metabolites in sun-dried kapenta fish and water of Lake Kariba in Zambia - A preliminary study”. Science of the Total Environment, 637(638), 1046-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.091

Greco, Mariana; Kemppainen, Minna; Pose, Graciela; Pardo, Alejandro. 2015: “Taxonomic characterization and secondary metabolite profiling of Aspergillus section Aspergillus contaminating feeds and feedstuffs”. Toxins, 7, 3512-3537. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7093512

Gromadzka, Karolina; Waśkiewicz, Agnieszka; Goliński, Piotr; Świetlik, Joanna. 2009: “Occurrence of estrogenic mycotoxin – Zearalenone in aqueous environmental samples with various NOM content”. Water Research, 43(4), 1051-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.042

Gurikar, Chennappa; Shivaprasad, Dp.; Sabillón, Luis; Gowda, Nanje A. N.; Siliveru, Kaliramesh. 2022: “Impact of mycotoxins and their metabolites associated with food grains”. Grain & Oil Science and Technology, 4, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaost.2022.10.001

He, Yuan; Zhang, Bo; Wu, Yili; Ouyang, Jiping; Huang, Mingzhi; Lu, Shaoyou; Sun, Hongwen; Zhang, Tao. 2021: “A pilot nationwide baseline survey on the concentrations of Neonicotinoid insecticides in tap water from China: Implication for human exposure”. Environmental Pollution, 291, 118117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118117

Hladik, Michelle L.; Calhoun, Daniel L. 2012: “Analysis of the herbicide diuron, three diuron degradates, and six neonicotinoid insecticides in water - Method details and application to two Georgia streams”. Scientific Investigations Report, 1, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20125206

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 2002: Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon (France), IARC press.

Jia, Qunpo; Cai, Yanpeng; Yuan, Xiao; Zhang, Xiaodong; Li, Bowen; Li, Bo. 2023: “Spatial distribution and ecological risks of neonicotinoid insecticides for an urban tidal stream of Guangzhou City, South China”. Ecological Indicators, 146, 109836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109836

Juraschek, Lena M.; Kappenberg, Arne; Amelung, Wulf. 2022: “Mycotoxins in soil and environment”. Science of the Total Environment, 814, 152425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152425

Kang, Hye S.; Kim, Mee K.; Kim, Eun J.; Choe, Won-Jo. 2020: “Determination of 66 pesticide residues in livestock products using QuEChERS and GC–MS/MS”. Food Science and Biotechnology, 29, 1573-1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-020-00798-4

Khoori, Esmat; Hakimzadeh Vahid; Sani, Ali M.; Rashidi Hasan. 2020: “Effect of ozonation, UV light radiation, and pulsed electric field processes on the reduction of total aflatoxin and aflatoxin M1 in acidophilus milk”. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 44, 14729. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14729

Klarich, Kathryn L.; Pflug, Nicholas C.; DeWald, Eden M.; Hladik, Michelle L.; Kolpin, Dana W.; Cwiertny, David M.; LeFevre, Gregory H. 2017: “Occurrence of neonicotinoid insecticides in finished drinking water and fate during drinking water treatment”. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 4(5), 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00081

Kolpin, Dana W.; Hoerger, Corinne C.; Meyer, Michael T.; Wettstein, Felix E.; Hubbard, Laura E.; Bucheli, Thomas D. 2010: “Phytoestrogens and mycotoxins in Iowa streams: an examination of underinvestigated compounds in agricultural basins”. Journal Environmental Quality, 39(6), 2089-2099. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0121

Kolpin Dana W.; Schenzel, Judith; Meyer, Michael T.; Phillips, Patrick J.; Hubbard, Laura E.; Scott, Tia-Marie; Bucheli, Thomas D. 2014: “Mycotoxins: Diffuse and point source contributions of natural contaminants of emerging concern to streams”. Science of The Total Environment, 470, 669-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.062

Kruć-Fijałkowska, Roksana; Dragon, Krzysztof; Drożdżyński, Dariusz; Górski, Józef. 2022: “Seasonal variation of pesticides in surface water and drinking water wells in the annual cycle in western Poland, and potential health risk assessment”. Scientific Reports, 12, 3317. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07385-z

Lamers, Marc; Anyusheva, Maria; La, Nguyen; Nguyen, Van V.; Streck, Thilo. 2011: “Pesticide pollution in surface and groundwater by paddy rice cultivation: a case study from northern Vietnam”. Clean Soil Air Water, 39(4), 356-361. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000268

Lima, José A. M. C.; Labanowski, Jérôme; Bastos, Marília C.; Zanella, Renato; Prestes, Osmar D.; Vargas, Jocelina P. R.; Mondamert, Leslie; Granado, Eugenie; Tiecher, Tales; Zafar, Mohsin; Troian, Alexandre; Guet, Thibaut L.; Santos, Danilo R. 2020: “Modern agriculture transfers many pesticides to watercourses: a case study of a representative rural catchment of southern Brazil”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 10581-10598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06550-8

Mata, Ana T.; Ferreira, João P.; Oliveira, Beatriz R.; Batoréu, Camila; Crespo, Maria T. B., Pereira, Vanessa J.; Bronze, Maria R. 2015: “Bottled water: Analysis of mycotoxins by LC–MS/MS”. Food Chemistry, 176, 455-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.088

Meyer-Wolfarth, Friederike; Oldenburg, Elisabeth; Meiners, Torsten; Muñoz, Katherine; Schrader, Stefan. 2021: “Effects of temperature and soil fauna on the reduction and leaching of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone from Fusarium graminearum-infected maize stubbles”. Mycotoxin Research, 37, 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-021-00434-y

Mhlongo, Thandazile N.; Ogola, Henry J. O.; Selvarajan, Ramganesh; Sibanda, Timothy; Kamika, Ilunga; Tekere, Memory. 2020: “Occurrence and diversity of waterborne fungi and associated mycotoxins in treated drinking water distribution system in South Africa: implications on water quality and public health”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08477-x

Michel, Natascha; Freese, Marko; Brinkmann, Markus; Pohlmann, Jan-Dag; Hollert, Henner; Kammann, Ulrike; Haarich, Michael; Theobald, Norbert; Gerwinski, Wolfgang; Rotard, Wolfgang D.; Hanel, Reinhold. 2016: “Fipronil and two of its transformation products in water and European eel from the river Elbe”. Science of The Total Environment, 568, 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.210

Michelin, Euder C.; Massocco, Marina M.; Godoy, Silvia H. S.; Baldin, Juliana C.; Yasui, George S.; Lima, César G.; Rottinghaus, George E.; Sousa, Ricardo L. M.; Fernandes, Andrezza M. 2016: “Carryover of aflatoxins from feed to lambari fish (Astyanax altiparanae) tissues”. Food Additives & Contaminants - Part A, 34(2), 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2016.1266097

Montiel-León, Juan M.; Duy, Sung V.; Muñoz, Gabriel; Amyot, Marc; Sauvé, Sébastien. 2018: “Evaluation of on-line concentration coupled to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for the quantification of neonicotinoids and fipronil in surface water and tap water”. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 410, 2765-2779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0957-2

Navaratna, Dimuth; Shu, Li; Jegatheesan, Veeriah. 2016: “Evaluation of herbicide (persistent pollutant) removal mechanisms through hybrid membrane bioreactors”. Bioresource Technology, 200, 795-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.041

Picardo, Massimo; Sanchís, Josep; Núñez, Oscar; Farré, Marinella. 2020: “Suspect screening of natural toxins in surface and drinking water by high performance liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry”. Chemosphere, 261, 127888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127888

Pires, Nilsrael A.; Oliveira, Mauro L. G.; Gonçalves, José A.; Faria, Adriana F. 2021: “Multiclass analytical method for pesticide and mycotoxin analysis in malt, brewers’ spent grain, and beer: development, validation, and application”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 69(15), 4533-4541. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07004

Richard, John L. 2007: “Some major mycotoxins and their mycotoxicosis”. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 119(2), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.019

Sánchez-Bayo, Francisco; Hyne, Ross V. 2014: “Detection and analysis of neonicotinoids in river waters – Development of a passive sampler for three commonly used insecticides”. Chemosphere, 99, 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.051

Schmidt-Heydt, Markus; Magan, Naresh; Geisen, Rolf. 2008: “Stress induction of mycotoxin biosynthesis genes by abiotic factors”. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 284(2), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01182.x

Schostag, Morten; Gobbi, Alex; Fini, Mahdi Nikbakht; Ellegaard-Jensen, Lea; Aamand, Jens; Hansen, Lars Hestbjerg; Muff, Jens; Albers, Christian. 2022: “Combining reverse osmosis and microbial degradation for remediation of drinking water contaminated with recalcitrant pesticide residue”. Water Research, 216, 118352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118352

Sibaja, Karen V. M.; Gonçalves, Keven D. M.; Garcia, Sabrina O.; Feltrin, Ana C. P.; Nogueira, Wesclen V.; Badiale-Furlong, Eliana; Garda-Buffon, Jaqueline. 2019: “Aflatoxin M1 and B1 in Colombian milk powder and estimated risk exposure”. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B, 12(2), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2019.1567611

Song, Le.; Pan, Canping; Yang, Juan; Zeng, Sujia; Han, Yongtao. 2020: “Dual-layer column filtration cleanup and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry detection for the analysis of 39 pesticide residues in porcine meat”. Journal of Separation Science, 43(7), 1306-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201900850

Sraw, Abhishek; Kaur, Taranjeet; Thakur, Ina; Verma, Anoop; Wanchoo, Ravinder K.; Toor, Amrit P. 2022: “Photocatalytic degradation of pesticide monocrotophos in water using W-TiO2 in slurry and fixed bed recirculating reactor”. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1265, 133392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133392

Sultana, Tamanna; Murray, Craig; Kleywegt, Sonya; Metcalfe, Chris D. 2018: “Neonicotinoid pesticides in drinking water in agricultural regions of southern Ontario, Canada”. Chemosphere, 202, 506-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.108

Sun, Wenshuo; Han, Zheng; Aerts, Johan; Nie, Dongxia; Jin, Mengtong; Shi, Wen; Zhao, Zhiyong; Saeger, Sarah; Zhao, Yong; Wu, Aibo. 2015: “A reliable liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of multiple mycotoxins in fresh fish and dried seafoods”. Journal of Chromatography A, 1387, 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.01.071

Tolosa, Josefa; Fonte, Guillermina; Mañes, Jordi; Ferrer, Emilia. 2017: “Mitigation of enniatins in edible fish tissues by thermal processes and identification of degradation products”. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 101(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.12.039

USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency National Primary Drinking Water Regulations). 2009: National primary drinking water regulations. https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations.

Wang, Chao-Yi; Yang, Jie; Qin, Jian-Chun; Yang, Ying-Wei. 2021: “Eco-friendly nanoplatforms for crop quality control, protection, and nutrition”. Advanced Science, 8(9), 2004525. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202004525

Waśkiewicz, Agnieszka; Gromadzka, Karolina; Bocianowski, Jan; Pluta, Paulina; Goliński, Piotr. 2012: “Zearalenone contamination of the aquatic environment as a result of its presence in crops”. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 63(4), 429-435. https://doi.org/10.2478/10004-1254-63-2012-2229

WHO (World Health Organization). 2022: Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda. Geneva (Switzerland), World Health Organization.

Wu, Changcai; Pan, Shaodong; Shan, Yongpan; Ma, Yajie; Wang, Dan; Song, Xianpeng; Hu, Hongyan; Ren, Xiangliang; Ma, Xiaoyan; Cui, Jinjie; Ma, Yan. 2022: “Microplastics mulch film affects the environmental behavior of adsorption and degradation of pesticide residues in soil”. Environmental Research, 214(4), 114133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114133

Yadav, Himanshu; Sankhla, Mahipal S.; Kumar, Rajeev. 2019: “Pesticides-induced carcinogenic & neurotoxic effect on human”. Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal, 7(5), 243-245. https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2019.07.00288

Yamamoto, Atsushi; Terao, Tomoko; Hisatomi, Hirotaka; Kawasaki, Hideya; Arakawa, Ryuichi. 2012: “Evaluation of river pollution of neonicotinoids in Osaka City (Japan) by LC/MS with dopant-assisted photoionization”. Journal Environmental Monitoring, 14, 2189-2194. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30296a

_______________________________

1 FAO, 2022.

2 Fernandes et al., 2019, 1377-1387. Chen et al., 2023, 160637.

3 Elfikrie et al., 2020, 136540. Çelik; Belli; Koçak, 2022, 60-65.

4 Gurikar et al., 2022, 1-18.

5 Pires et al., 2021, 4533-4541.

6 Wu et al., 2022, 114133.

7 Juraschek; Kappenberg; Amelung, 2022, 152425.

8 WHO, 2022.

9 El-Nahhal; El-Nahhal, 2021, 113611. Kruć-Fijałkowska et al., 2022, 3317.

10 WHO, 2022.

11 Ellner, 2005, 112-115.

12 Bellí et al., 2006, 1021-1029. Costa; Cerqueira; Garda-Buffon, 2019, 1860-1870.

13 Ellner, 2005, 112-115.

14 Feksa et al., 2019, 128-134.

15 Bellí et al., 2006, 1021-1029.

16 Costa; Cerqueira; Garda-Buffon, 2019, 1860-1870.

17 Richard, 2007, 3-10.

18 Schmidt-Heydt; Magan; Geisen, 2008, 142-149.

19 IARC, 2002.

20 Greco et al., 2015, 3512-3537.

21 Wang et al., 2021, 2004525.

22 Kolpin et al., 2010, 2089-2099.

23 Meyer-Wolfarth et al., 2021, 249-263.

24 IARC, 2002. Kruć-Fijałkowska et al., 2022, 3317.

25 Bohn et al., 2011, 1041-1054.

26 Klarich et al., 2017, 168-173.

27 Sultana et al., 2018, 506-513.

28 Caldas et al., 2019, 71-80.

29 Bohn et al., 2011, 1041-1054.

30 Montiel-León et al., 2018, 2765-2779.

31 He et al., 2021, 118117.

32 Kolpin et al., 2010, 2089-2099.

33 Hladik; Calhoun, 2012, 3-9.

34 Yamamoto et al., 2012, 2189-2194.

35 Dijk; Staalduinen; Sluijs, 2013, e62374.

36 Sánchez-Bayo; Hyne, 2014, 143-151.

37 Michel et al., 2016, 171-179.

38 Lima et al., 2020, 10581-10598.

39 Jia et al., 2023, 109836.

40 Lamers et al., 2011, 356-361.

41 Kruć-Fijałkowska et al., 2022, 3317.

42 Mata et al., 2015, 455-464.

43 Banu; Sadagopan, 2016, 207-217.

44 Picardo et al., 2020, 127888.

45 Mhlongo et al., 2020, 519.

46 Diab et al., 2021, 75-102.

47 Bucheli et al., 2008, 1029-1034.

48 Gromadzka et al., 2009, 1051-1059.

49 Kolpin et al., 2010, 2089-2099.

50 Waśkiewicz et al., 2012, 429-435.

51 Kolpin et al., 2014, 669-676.

52 Emídio; Silva; Marchi, 2015, 1-8.

53 Gromadzka et al., 2009, 1051-1059.

54 WHO, 2022.

55 WHO, 2022.

56 European Commission, 1996.

57 Michel et al., 2016, 171-179.

58 Gonkowski et al., 2018, 1046-1050.

59 Song et al., 2020, 1306-1315.

60 Kang et al., 2020, 1573-1586.

61 Al-Amri et al., 2021, 709-720.

62 Tolosa et al., 2017, 67-74.

63 Michelin et al., 2016, 265-272. Deng et al., 2020, 735055.

64 Gonçalves et al., 2018, 260-264.

65 Sibaja et al., 2019, 97-104.

66 Sun et al., 2015, 42-48.

67 IARC, 2002. Eagles et al., 2021, 129279. Kruć-Fijałkowska et al., 2022, 3317.

68 Yadav; Sankhla; Kumar, 2019, 243-245.

69 Brasil, 2021. USEPA, 2009. China, 2006. European Union, 2020.

70 WHO, 2022.

71 Khoori et al., 2020, 14729.

72 Diao et al., 2019, 957.

73 Garcia et al., 2020, 109039.

74 Sraw et al., 2022, 1265.

75 Schotag et al. 2022, 118352.

76 Navaratna; Shu; Jegatheesan, 2016, 795-803.

77 Garcia et al., 2020, 109039. Dudziak, 2012, 779-785. Bosch et al., 2017, 97.