Lear and Quijote, two wanderers on uneven paths
Abstract
King Lear of Britain and Don Quijote de la Mancha, both old and frail, are dwellers of two very different worlds and eras. The ways they were devised and shaped by William Shakespeare and Miguel de Cervantes generate nonetheless diverse similarities that emphatically expose crucial traits of the human nature.
The meaningful, more obvious dichotomies in the texts – such as Reality/Fantasy, Sight/Blindness, Truth/Falsehood, Loyalty/Treachery – frame the complexity of the protagonists and are metaphors of their antithetical features. On the other hand, their alienation, misapprehension and distortion of the surrounding realities turn them into wanderers on uneven, problematic paths, while their frail physical condition discloses a surface layer that encapsulates assertive individuals.
This essay approaches Shakespeare’s and Cervantes’ texts by focusing on such aspects, as well as on the respective contextualisation. Each work constitutes a challenging exemplum of a unique, proficuous broad age that wisely amalgamated the old and the new: amidst a multitude of cultural traditions, King Lear primarily embodies the expansion of Tragedy, while Don Quijote de la Mancha primarily materialises the transition to a new stage of Modernity.
Keywords: Lear; Quijote; dichotomies; alienation; tradition; innovation
Downloads
References
Aristotle. The Poetics. Trans. W. Hamilton Fyfe. Aristotle, The Poetics. “Longinus, On the Sublime. Demetrius, On Style. Ed. T.E. Page, et al. The Loeb Classical Library. London: William Heinemann; Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1960. 1-118.
Cervantes, Miguel de. Don Quijote de la Mancha. Ed. Francisco Rico. Barcelona: Instituto Cervantes, 1998.
Erasmus, Desiderius. Praise of Folly. Trans. Betty Radice. Introd. and Notes A.H.T. Levi. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1993.
Gracián, Baltasar. Agudeza y Arte de Ingenio. Colección Austral. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1942.
---. El Héroe / El Discreto / Oráculo manual y arte de prudencia. Ed. Luys Santa Marina. Clássicos Universales Planeta. Barcelona: Planeta, 1984.
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies. A Study in Medieval olitical Theology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1957.
Llull, Ramon. Livro da Ordem de Cavalaria. Trad. Artur Guerra. Lisboa: Assírio e Alvim, 1992.
More, Thomas. Utopia. Ed. George M. Longan and Robert M. Adams. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989.
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of King Lear: The Folio Text. The Complete Works. Ed. Stanley Wells et al. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1986. 1063-1098.
---. King Richard III. Ed. Janis Lull. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.
Sidney, Sir Philip. An Apology for Poetry (or The Defence of Poesy). Ed. Geoffrey Shepherd. Rev. and Exp. By R.W. Maslen. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Also, authors will retain the rights on their work, even if they will be granting The Grove. Working Papers on English Studies a non-exclusive right of use to reproduce, edit, distribute, publicly communicate and show their work. Therefore, authors are free to engage in additional, independent contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in this journal (such as uploading them to an institutional repository or publishing them in a book), as long as the fact that the manuscripts were first published in this journal is acknowledged.
