Principio de Resistencia y futuro de la Corte Europea de Derechas Humanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17561/rej.n24.8505Palabras clave:
resistencia basada en principios, Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos (TEDH), Convención Europea de Derechos Humanos (CEDH), retiro de un tratado internacional, derecho internacional, protección de los derechos humanosResumen
El presente documento intenta enfocar y analizar un tipo particular de retiro de los Estados partes de la Convención Europea de Derechos Humanos (CEDH) debido a la falta de ejecución de las sentencias del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos (TEDH). ¿Cuál es el círculo legal de este tipo de retiro? ¿Cuál es el papel del TEDH? ¿Existen ejemplos de desobediencia activa por parte de algún Estado parte que quiera salir de la Convención? ¿Es aplicable el régimen legal de retiro en el derecho internacional de tratados también en el caso de la CEDH? ¿Cuáles son los mecanismos de retiro de la CEDH? Estos son algunos de los temas que intentamos analizar en este documento teniendo en cuenta la jurisprudencia del TEDH.
Descargas
Referencias
Ahrens, H., Fischer, H., y Gòmez, U. (2019). Equal access to justice for all and goal 16 of the sustainable development agenda: Challenges for Latin America and Europe. Lit Verlag.
Aloupi, N., Rapoport, C., y Kaddous, C. (2019). Les accords internationaux de l'Union europèenne. Editions de l'Universitè de Bruxelles.
Alves Pinto, T. (2020). An empirical investigation of the use of limitations to freedom of religion or belief at the European Court of Human Rights. Religion & Human Rights, 15(1-2), 100ss. https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-BJA10004
Arnardòttir, O. M. (2017a). Vulnerability under article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Innovation or business as usual? Oslo Law Review, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2017-03-03
Arnardòttir, P.M. (2017b). Res interpretata, erga omnes effect and the role of the margin of appreciation in giving domestic effect to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 28(3), 824ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx045
Athanassiou, P. (2009). Withdrawal and expulsion from the EU and EMU, some reflections. Legal Working Paper Series, 10. ECB. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1517760
Augenstein, D., Dziedzic, L. (2017). State obligations to regulate and adjudicate corporate activities under the European Convention on Human Rights. EUI, working papers, LAW 2017/15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3100186
Auvret-Finck, J. (2013). Le Parlement europèen après l'entrèe en viguer du traitè de Lisbonne. Larcier.
Barnard, C. (2016). The substantive law of the EU: The four freedoms. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198749950.001.0001
Bates, E. (2008). Avoiding legal obligations created by human rights treaties. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(4), 751-788. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589308000602
Bates, E. (2014). Analysing the prisoner voting saga and the British challenge to Strasbourg. Human Rights Law Review, 14(3), 503-540. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu024
Bates, E. (2015). The UK and Strasbourg: A strained relationship. The long view. En K. S. Ziegler, E. Wicks y L. Hodson, The UK and European human rights. A strained relationship? (pp. 542ss). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bates, E. (2017). Democratic override (or rejection) and the authority of the Strasbourg Court: The UK Parliament and prisoner voting. En M. Saul, A. Føllesdal y G. Ulfstein, The international human rights judiciary and national parliaments: Europe and beyond (pp. 277-278). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316874820.012
Bates, E. (2020). Strasbourg's integrationist role or the need for self-restraint?. European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, 1(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-00101003
Benvenisti, E. (1999). Margin of appreciation, consensus and universal standards. International Law and Politics, 31, 843-854. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei007
Berry, E., Homewood, M. J., y Bogusz, B. (2019). Complete EU law: Text, cases and materials. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198836216.001.0001
Besson, S. (2016). Subsidiarity in international human rights law: What is subsidiary about human rights? The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 61(1), 74ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auw009
Billing, F. M. W. (2016). The right to silence in transnational criminal proceedings: Comparative law perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42034-9
Bindman Qc, G. (2019, October, 9). What future for human rights? New Law Journal. https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/what-future-for-human-rights
Bjorge, E. (2014). The evolutionary interpretation of treaties. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716143.001.0001
Bobansky, D. (2012). Legitimacy in international law and relations. En J. L. Dunoff y M. A. Pollack, Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations. The state of art. Cambridge University Press.
Bosse-Platière, I., y Rapoport, C. (2014). L'Etat tier en droit de l'union europèenne. Bruylant.
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the EU rules the world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001
Brems, E. (2013). Diversity and European human rights: Rewriting judgments of the ECHR. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208130
Brems, E., y Gerards, J. (2014). Shaping rights in the European Convention on Human Rights. The role of the European Court of Human Rights in determining the scope of human rights. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337923
Breuer, M. (2019a). "Principled resistance" to ECtHR judgments: Dogmatic framework and conceptual meaning. En M. Breuer (Ed.), Principled resistance to ECtHR judgments - A new paradigm? Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_1
Breuer, M. (Eds.) (2019b). Principled resistance to ECtHR judgments-A new paradigm? Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1
Caddous, C. (2015). The EU in international organisations and global governance: Recent developments. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Čapeta, T. (2016). Brexit and the constitutional order: A three act tragedy. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 12, 8ss. https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.12.2016.260
Christoffersen, J., y Rask Madsen, M. (2011). The European Court of Human Rights between law and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694495.001.0001
Cliquennois, G., y De Suremain, H. (2017). Monitoring penal policy in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542034
Closa, C. (Ed.) (2017). Secession from a Member State and withdrawal from the European Union. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771464
Corten, O. y Klein, P. (Eds.) (2011). The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. A Commentary. Oxford University Press.
Costa, J. P. (2017). La Cour europèenne des droits de l'homme.Des juges pour la libertè. Dalloz.
Cowell, F. (2018). Exit clauses in regional human rights systems: The socialisation of human rights at work. International Organization Law Review, 15(2), 407ss. https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01502007
Cowell, F. (2019). Understanding the causes and consequences of British exceptionalism towards the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Human Rights, 23(7), 1191ss. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1597714
Craig, P. (2016). Brexit: A drama in six acts. European Law Review, 41(4), 450ss. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:66ac5017-6e5b-4f97-9861-c84aa7138808
Craig, P., y De Bùrca, G. (2011). The evolution of EU law. Oxford University Press.
Davies, G. (2012). Activisim relocated. The self-restraint of the ECtHR in its national context. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 79ss. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.632146
Davis, H. (2016). Human rights law directions. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765882.001.0001
De Bùrca, G., y Weiler, J. H. H. (2011). The worlds of European constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press.
De Londras, F., y Dzehtsiarou, K. (2017). Mission impossible? Addressing non-execution through infringement proceedings in the European Court of Human Rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 467-490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058931700001X
De Pauw, M. (2016). The inter-American Court of human rights and the imperative method of external referencing regional consensus v. universality. En Y. Haeck, O. Ruiz-Chiriboga y C. Cherrera, The inter-American Court of human rights: theory and practice, present and future (pp. 3-24). SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827292
Decheva, M. (2018). Recht der europäischen Union. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827292
Djeffal, C. (2016). Static and evolutive treaty interpretation: A functional reconstruction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316339558
Donald, A., y Leach, P. (2023, May, 5). The UK vs the ECtHR: Anatomy of a politically engineered collision course. VerfBlog. https://verfassungsblog.de/the-uk-vs-the-european-court-of-human-rights-on-a-politically-engineered-collision-course/
Dörr, O., y Schmalenbach, K., (Eds.) (2012). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19291-3
Dorssemont, F., Lörcher, K., y Clauwaert, S. (2019). The Charter of fundamental rights of the EU and the employment relation. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509922680
Dothan, S. (2014). The optional use of comparative law. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 41(1), 24ss. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1055&context=djilp
IDraghici, C. (2017). The legitimacy of family rights in Strasbourg case law: "Living instrument" or extinguished sovereignty? Bloomsbury Publishing.
Dzehtsiarou, K. (2011). Does consensus matter? Legitimacy of European consensus in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Public Law, 538ss. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1944920
Dzehtsiarou, K. (2015). European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644471
Dzehtsiarou, K. (2019, June, 4). How many judgments does one need to enforce a judgment? The first ever infringement proceedings at the European Court of Human Rights. Strasbourg Observer. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2019/06/04/how-many-judgments-does-one-need-to-enforce-a-judgment-the-first-ever-infringement-proceedings-at-the-european-court-of-human-rights/
Dzehtsiarou, K., y Fontanelli, F. (2018). Unprincipled disobedience to international decisions: A primer from the Russian Constitutional Court. European Yearbook on Human Rights, 23(1), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688008.014
Eeckhout, P., y Frantziou, E. (2017). Brexit and Article 50 TEU: A constitutionalist reading. Common Market Law Review, 54, 695ss. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2017058
Emerson, B., ASshworth, A., Macdonald, A., Summers, M. A. (2012). Human rights and criminal justice. Sweet & Maxwell.
Emmert, F., y Petrovi, S. (2014). The past, present and future of EU enlargement. Fordham International Law Journal, 47(5), 1362ss. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2350&context=ilj
Fabbrini, F. (2017). The law and politics of Brexit. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198811763.001.0001
Ferreira, N., y Kostakopoulou, D. (2016). The human face of the European Union. Are European Union law and policy humane enough? Cambridge University Press, 94ss. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139924795.002
Fitzmaurice, M., y Merkouris, P. (2020). Treaties in motion. The evolution of treaties from formation to termination. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108863407.005
Fokas, E. (2017). The European Court of human Rights at the grassroots level: Who knows what about religion at the European Court of Humna Rights and to what effects? Religion, State and Society, 45(3-4), 252ss. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2017.1398440
Folsom, T.H. (2017). Principles of European Union law, including Brexit. West Academic.
Gerards, J. (2014a). Advisory opinions preliminary rulings and the new Protocol n. 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights. A comparative and critical appraisal. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 21(4), 636ss. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X1402100404
Gerards, J. (2014b). The European Court of Human Rights and the national courts: Giving shape to the notion of "shared responsibility". En J. Gerards y J. Fleuren, Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the judgements of the ECtHR in national case law (pp. 45ss). Cambridge University Press.
Gerards, J., y Lambrecht, S. (2018, April, 18). The final Copenhagen Declaration: Fundamentally improved with a few remaining caveats. Strasbourg Observer. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2018/04/18/the-final-copenhagen-declaration-fundamentally-improved-with-a-few-remaining-caveats/
Gerards, J. H., y Glas, L. R. (2017). Acess to justice in the European Convention on Human rights system. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 35(1), 16ss. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051917693988
Glas, L. R. (2019). The European Court of Human Rights supervising the execution of its judgments. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 37(3), 232ss. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051919861844
Glas, L. R. (2020). From Interlaken to Copenhagen: What has become of the proposals aiming to reform the functioning of the European Court of Human Rights? Human Rights Law Review, 20(1), 128ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa001
Gòrski, M. (2017). Quo vadis Russia? On the country's recent approach towards implementing judgments of European Court of Human Rights. Comparative Law Review, 23, 142ss. https://doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2017.006
Grabenwarter, C. (2014). European Convention on human rights: ECHR. C.H. Beck. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845258942
Graham, L. (2020). Strategic admissibility decisions in the European Court of Human Rights. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(1), 84ss. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000460
Grosclaude, L. (2015). La clause de retrait du Traité établissant une Constitution pour l'Europe. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, 41(2), 543ss. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1244550
Groussot, X., y Petursson, G. T. (2015). The EU Charter of the Fundamental Rights five years on. The emergence of a new constitutional framework? En S. De Vries, U. Bernits y S. Weatherill, The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as a binding instrument. Five years old and growing. Oxford University Press.
Haeck, Y., Ruiz-Chiriboga, O., y Herrera, C. (2016). The inter-American Court of human rights: Theory and practice, present and future. Intersentia.
Haguenau-Moizard, C., y Mestre, C. (2017). La dèmocratie dans l'Union europèenne. Bruylant.
Haratsch, A., Koenig, C., y Pechstein, M. (2020). Europarecht. Mohr Siebeck. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-159295-9
Hardman, H., y Dickson, B. (2017). Electoral rights in Europe: Advances and challenges. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315470498
Harris, D., O'Boyle, M., y Warbrick, C. (2014). Law of the European Convention on Human rights. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199606399.001.0001
Hatje, A., Terhechte, J. P., y Müller-Graff, P. C. (2018). Europarechtswissenschaft. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845298160
Helfer, L. (2005). Exiting treaties. Virginia Law Review, 91, 1581ss. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2025/
Helfer, L. R., y Voeten, E. (2020). Walking back human rights in Europe? European Journal of International Law, 31(3), 800ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa071
Hill, J. (1982). The European Economic Community: The right of Member State withdrawal. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 12.
Hillion, C. (2016). Leaving the EU, the Union way. A legal analysis of article 50 TEU. European Policy Analysis, 8, 6ss. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306263641_Leaving_the_European_Union_the_Union_way
Hofmeister, H. (2010). "Should I stay or should I go?"-A Critical analysis of the right to withdraw from the EU. European Law Journal, 16, 589ss. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00524.x
Hollis, D. B. (Ed.) (2020). The Oxford guide to treaties. Oxford University Press.
Holterhus, T. P. (2019). The law behind rule of law transfers: On rule based interactions of legal orders in a globalized world. Nomos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845298481
Huysmans, M. (2019). Enlargement and exit: The origins of article 50. European Union Politics, 20(2), 160ss. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116519830202
Iglesias Vila, M. (2017). Subsidiarity, margin of appreciation and international adjudication within a cooperative conception of human rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 15(2), 396ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox035
Jacob, J. M. (2016). Civil justice in the age of human rights. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315572239
Jahn, J. (2014). Normative guidance from Strasbourg through advisory opinion. Deprivation or relocation of the convention's core? Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 74, 846ss. https://www.zaoerv.de/74_2014/74_2014_4_a_821_846.pdf
Kadelbach, S., Rensmann, T., y Rieter, E. (2019). Judging international human rights. Courts of general jurisdiction as human rights courts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94848-5
Kahn, J. (2019). The relationship between the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation: Conflicting conceptions of sovereignty in Strasbourg and St Petersburg. European Journal of International Law, 30(3), 938ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz049
Kälin, W., y Künzli, J. (2019). The law of international human rights protection. Oxford University Press.
Kapotas, P., y Tzevelekos, V. P. (2019). Building consensus on European consensus: Judicial interpretation of human rights in European and beyond. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564779
Katz Cogan, J. (2006). Non compliance and the international rule of law. The Yale Journal of International Law, 31, 194ss. https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1396&context=fac_pubs
Kellerbauer, M., Klamert, M., y Tomkin, J. (2019). Commentary on the European Union treaties and the Charter of fundamental rights. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794561.001.0001
Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, A. (2018). The international legal personality of the individual. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198820376.001.0001
Kleinlein, T. (2017). Consensus and contestability: The ECtHR and the combined potential of European consensus and procedural rationality control. European Journal of International Law, 28(3), 874ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx055
Komanovics, A. (2018). Infringement proceedings against Azerbaijan. Judicialisation of the exectution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. Anuario Facultade de Direito da Universidade da Coruña, 22, 142ss. https://doi.org/10.17979/afdudc.2018.22.0.5206
Kosař, D., Petrov, J., Šipulovà, K., Smekal, H., Lyhnànek, L., y Janovský, J. (2020). Domestic judicial treatment of European Court of Human Rights case law. Beyond compliance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429343933
Kumm, M. (2004). The legitimacy of international law: A constitutionalist framework of analysis. European Journal of International Law, 15(5), 914. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/15.5.907
Kunz, R. (2020). Judging international judgments anew? The human rights courts before domestic courts. The European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1136ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz063
Lang, R. (2018). Complex equality and the Court of Justice of the European Union: Reconciling diversity and harmonization. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004354265
Łazowski, A. (2016). Multilateral withdrawal from the EU: Realistic scenario or a folly? Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1296ss. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1174529
Leach, P. (2011). Taking a case to the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Legg, A. (2012). The margin of appreciation in international human rights law: Deference and proportionality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199650453.001.0001
Lenaerts, K. (2019). Limits on limitations: The essence of fundamental rights in the European Union. German Law Journal, 20, 782ss. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.62
Liakopoulos, D. (2014). The margin of appreciation in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. International and European Union Legal Matters.
Liakopoulos, D. (2015). Protection of human rights between European Court of Human Rights and Court of European Union. International and European Union Legal Matters.
Liakopoulos, D. (2018a). Competition, confusion or complementarity for the protection of human rights between constitutional, international and European law. Juris Gradibus.
Liakopoulos, D. (2018b). Interactions between European Court of Human Rights and private international law of European Union. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, 10(1), 254ss. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2018.4123
Liakopoulos, D. (2019). European integration through member states' constitutional identity in EU law. Maklu, Antwerp.
Lobos, R. (2020). Los derechos humanos y teoría de sistemas. Revista Mad, 41, 32ss. https://revistamad.uchile.cl/index.php/RMAD/article/view/57606
Lord, C. (2017). The legitimacy of exits form the EU. Journal of European Integration, 39(5), 502ss. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1333117
Loth, W., y Paun, N. (2014). Disintegration and integration in East-Central Europe. Nomos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845254227
Louis, J. V. (2006). Le droit de retrait de l'Union européenne. Cahiers de Droit Européen, 42, 293ss. https://books.openedition.org/pufr/1551?lang=it
Madsen, M. (2016). The challenging authority of the European Court of Human Rights: from cold war legal diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and backlash. Law and Contemporary Problems, 79, 142-178. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588471
Madsen, M. (2017). Rebalancing European human rights: Has the Brighton Declaration engendered a new deal on human rights in Europe? Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 9(2), 12ss. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993222
Madsen, M. (2019a). Resistance to the European Court of Human Rights: The institutional and sociological consequences of principled resistance. En M. Breuer (Ed.), Principled resistance to ECtHR Judgments-A new paradigm? (pp. 39ss). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_2
Madsen, M. (2019b). The institutional and sociological consequences of principles resistance. En M. Breuer (Ed.), Principled resistance to ECtHR Judgments-A new paradigm? (pp. 37ss). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_2
Madsen, M., Cebulak, P., y Wiebusch, M. (2018). Backlash against international Courts: Explaining the forms and patterns of resistance to international courts. International Journal of Law in Context, 14(2), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000034
Malksoo, L., y Benedek, W. (Eds.) (2018). Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg effect. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235075
Mangas Martìn, A. (2018). Tratado de la Uniòn Europea, Tratado de Funcionamiento. Marcial Pons.
Marchadier, F. (2014). Convention européenne des droit de l'homme et des libertès fondamentales. Revue Critique de Droit International Privè, 193(4), 679-694.
Martucci, F. (2019). Droit de l'Union europèenne. LGDG.
Mcgolbrick, D. (2016). A defence of the margin of appreciation and an argument for its application by the human rights committee. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 65(1), 26ss. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589315000457
Mendes, J., y Venzke, I. (2018). Allocating authority. Who should do what in European and international law? Bloomsbury Publishing.
Milanovič, M., y Papič, T. (2018). The applicability of the European Convention on Human Rights in contested territories. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 67(4), 782ss. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589318000234
Miller, V. (2014). Is adherence to the European Convention on Human Rights a condition of European Union membership? Commons Briefing Papers. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06577/
Myjer, E. (2013). Why much of the criticism of the ECtHR is unfounded. En S. Flogaitis, T. Zwart y J. Fraser (Eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and its discontents: Turning criticism into strength (pp. 40ss). Edward Elgar Publishers.
Naldi, G. J., y Magliveras, K. D. (2013). Human Rights and the denunciation of treaties and withdrawal from international organizations. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 33, 124-125. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2473092
Neuman, G. L. (2020). Human rights in a time of populism: Challenges and responses. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108751551
Nicolaides, P. (2013). Withdrawal from the European Union: A typology of effects. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 20(2), 209ss. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X1302000204
Nicolaides, P. A., y Roy, T. (2017). Brexit and trade: Between facts and irrelevance. Interconomics, 52, 104ss. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-017-0654-y
Nussberger, A. (2020). The European Court of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
O'Cinneide, C. (2017). Saying "no" to Strasbourg: When are national Parliaments justified in refusing to give effect to judgments of International Human Rights Courts? En M. Saul, A. Follesdal y G. Ulfstein, The international human rights judiciary and national parliaments: Europe and beyond (pp. 304-328). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316874820.013
Palombino, F. M. (2019). Duelling for supremacy. International law vs. national fundamental principles. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108601245
Paulus, A. (2014). From implementation to translation: Applying the European Court of Human Rights judgments in the domestic legal orders. En A. Seibert-Fohr y M. E. Villiger (Eds.), Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Effects and implementation (pp. 269ss). Nomos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845259345_267
Pedersen, M. B., y Kinley, D. (2016). Principled engagement. Negotiating rights in repressive States. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602141
Picod, F., y Van Droogbenbroeck, S. (2018). Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union europèenne. Bruylant.
Pila, J., y Torremans, P. (2019). European intellectual property law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198831280.001.0001
Piris, J. C. (2006). Le Traité Constitutionnel pour l'Europe: une analyse juridique. Bruylant.
Plątek, W. (2019). The right to an effective remedy in European law: Significance content and interaction. China-EU Law Journal, 6, 168ss. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-019-00086-3
Popovic, D. (2009). Prevailing judicial activism over self-restraint in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Creighton Law Review, 42, 361ss.
Posner, E. (2014). The twilight of human rights law. Oxford University Press.
Priollaud, X., y Siritzky, D. (2005). La Constitution européenne-texte et commentaires. La Documentation Française.
Quast Mertsch, A. (2012). The reform measures of European Convention on Human Rights Protocol n. 14 and the provisional application of treaties. En M. Fitzmaurice y P. Merkouris, The interpretation and application of the European Convention on Human Rights. Legal and practical implications. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004242838_003
Rainey, B., Wicks, W., y Ovey, C. (2017). Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198767749.001.0001
Roter, P. (2018). Russia in the Council of Europe: Participation à la carte. En L. Malksoo, y W. Benedek (Eds.), Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg effect (pp. 26-56). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235075.004
Russell, H. (2017). The use of force and article 2 of the ECHR in light of European conflicts. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Schabas, W. A. (2015). The European Convention on Human Rights: A commentary. Oxford University Press.
Scheinin, M. (2019). Human rights norms in "other" international courts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108584623
Schütze, R., y Tridimas, T. (2018). Oxford principles of European Union Law. Oxford University Press.
Schwarze, J., Becker, V., Hatje, A., y Schoo, J. (2019). EU-Kommentar. Nomos.
Seibert-Fohr, A., y Villiger, M. E. (2017). Judgments of the European Convention of Human Rights. Effects and implementation. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315590738
Shauna Wheatle, S. (2017). Principled reasoning in human rights adjudication. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Sicilianos, L. A. (2014). The role of the European Court of Human Rights in the execution of its own judgments. Reflections on article 46 European Convention on Human Rights. En A. Seibert-Fohr y M. E. Villiger (Eds.), Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Effects and implementation (pp. 294ss). Nomos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845259345_285
Smet, S. (2010). Freedom of expression and the right to reputation: Human rights in conflict. American University of International Law Review, 26, 190ss. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr/vol26/iss1/8/
Spielmann, D. (2012). Allowing the right margin: The European Court of Human Rights and the national margin of appreciation doctrine: Waiver or subsidiarity of European review. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 14, 384ss. https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712805580570
Starzhenetskiy, V. (2019). The execution of the ECtHR judgements and the "right to object" of the Russian Constitutional Court. En M. Breuer (Eds.), Principled resistance to ECtHR judgments-A new paradigm? (pp. 245ss). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_8
Stern, K., Sachs, M. (2016). Europäische Grundrecht Charta. C. H. Beck.
Sudre, F. (2021). La Convention europèennes des droits de l'homme. PUF.
Tan, D. (2018). Demarcating the margin. Positive obligations under article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Columbia Journal of European Law, 21. https://cjel.law.columbia.edu/preliminary-reference/2018/demarcating-the-margin-positive-obligations-under-article-14-of-the-european-convention-on-human-rights/
Tatham, A. F. (2012). "Don't mention divorce at the wedding, Darling!": EU accession and withdrawal after Lisbon. En A. Biondi y P. Eeckhout (Eds.), EU Law after Lisbon (pp. 152ss). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644322.003.0006
Temperman, J., Jeremy Gunn, T., y Evans, M. D. (2019). The European Court of human Rights ans the freedom of religion or belief: The 25 years since Kokkinakis. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004346901
Thomas, C. A. (2014). The uses and abuses of legitimacy in international law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(4), 732ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu008
Thornhill, C., y Smirnova, M. (2018). Litigation and political transformation. The case of Russia. Theory and Society, 47, 562ss. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9327-5
Thym, D. (2017). Questioning EU citizenship. Judges and the limits of free movement and solidarity in the European Union. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Tyrrell, H. (2018). Human rights in the UK and the influence of foreign jurisprudence. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Usherwood, J., y Pinder, S. (2018). The European Union. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198808855.001.0001
Vahlas, A. (2005). Appartenance à l'Union européenne. En V. Constantinesco, Y. Gautier y V. Michel (Eds.), Le Traité établissant une Constitution pour l'Europe (pp. 267-270). PUS.
Van Aaken, A., y Motoć, I., (eds.). (2018). The European Convention on Human Rights and general international law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830009.001.0001
Van Dijk, P., Van Hoof, F., Van Rijn, A., y Zwaak, L. (Eds.) (2018). Theory and practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.
Villiger, M. E. (2023). Handbook on the European Convention on Human Rights. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004443839
Virseda Fernàndez, C. (2020). Uniòn europea. Editorial Aranzadi.
Von Staden, A. (2018). Strategies of compliance with the European Court of Human Rights rational choice within normative constraints. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812295153
Wildhaber, L., Hjartarson, A., y Donnelly, S. (2013). No consensus on consensus? The practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Journal, 22, 248-263. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2398955
Yildiz, E. (2020). A Court with many faces: Judicial characters and modes of norm development in the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 31(1), 79ss. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa014
Zand, J. (2017). The concept of democracy and the European Convention on Human Rights. University of Baltimore Journal of International Law, 5(2), 204ss. https://doi.org/10.18060/7909.0045
Ziegler, K.S., Wicks, E., y Hodson, L. (2015). The UK and European human rights. A strained relationship? Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2568704
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 dimitris
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
