Legal aspects of the rules of engagement as modulators of the use of force in operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17561/rej.n25.9826Keywords:
Rules of Engagement, Escalation of force, International Humanitarian Law, OTAN, Caveats, Hybrid warfareAbstract
The Rules of Engagement (ROE) are military command orders that define how and when force is applied in operations, ensuring its legality, proportionality, and
legitimacy. Their historical development has led to standardization in multinational settings such as NATO, incorporating principles of International Humanitarian Law. Today’s asymmetric conflicts, hybrid warfare, and technological advances demand the continuous adaptation of these rules. Escalation of force and national caveats are essential for modulating the use of force, protecting civilians and troops, and preserving discipline and mission success.
Downloads
References
Alía Plana, J. M. (2015). Reglas de enfrentamiento y gobierno del Campo de Agramante. Revista del Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos, 5. https://revista.ieee.es/article/view/277
De Borja Lasheras, F. (2015). Genocidio, víctimas y justicia. Srebrenica 20 años después. Política Exterior, 29(166), 14-20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43595094
Corn, G. S., & Corn, G. P. (2011). The law of operational targeting: Viewing the LOAC through an operational lens. Texas International Law Journal, 47.
East, W. B. (2013). A historical review and analysis of Army physical readiness training and assessment. Combat Studies Institute Press, US Army Combined Arms Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA622014
Frost-Nielsen, P. M. (2017). Conditional commitments: Why states use caveats to reserve their efforts in military coalition operations. Contemporary Security Policy, 38(3), 371-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1300364
Gill, T. D., & Fleck, D. (Eds.). (2015). The handbook of the international law of military operations (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198744627.001.0001
Henckaerts, J. M., & Alvermann, C. (2005). Customary international humanitarian law (vol. 1). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804700
Ruiz, S. A. (2018). La matanza de My Lai y el procedimiento contra William Calley. En E. Prado Rubio, L. Martínez Peñas, M. Fernández Rodríguez (Coords.), El año de los doce mayos. 1968 (pp. 119-150). Omnia Mutantur.
Schmitt, M. N. (2012). Military necessity and humanity in international humanitarian law: Preserving the delicate balance. In M. N. Schmitt, Essays on Law and War at the Fault Lines (pp. 89-129). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-740-1_3
Stephens, D. (1998). Rules of engagement and the concept of unit self-defense. Naval Law Review, 45.
Tzu, Sun. (1990). El arte de la guerra (S. A. Álvarez, Trad.). Editorial Fundamentos.
Walzer, M. (2015). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations (5th ed.). Basic Books.
Watkin, K. (2016). Fighting at the legal boundaries: Controlling the use of force in contemporary conflict. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190457976.001.0001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 José Jáudenes Piferrer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
