Beyond the confines of orality: the value of memory in the recording of intangible cultural heritage

Authors

  • Luis Díaz Gonzalez CSIC- UVa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17561/blo.vextra7.8978

Keywords:

Memory, Cultural heritage

Abstract

This paper aims to reflect on the criteria that give value to expressions of popular cultures linked –in some way– to oral tradition, so that they become susceptible to being recorded and preserved as part of the «Intangible Cultural Heritage». It is a fact that different cultural traditions define the world in different ways and at the same time determine what is beautiful or what is worth preserving as important. In this sense, it may seem that the process by which the type of literature and –in particular– printed matter considered as «popular» have gone from being disdained in their oralized version by many folklore collectors to awakening interest is due to a kind of «natural course» of things. Something that had to happen inevitably. As if technological innovations and the digitalization of a good part of the existing funds or the growing attention on the part of documentalists and librarians towards them were enough –in themselves– to explain such a change. And it is reviewed and argued here how a theoretical and methodological rethinking, interdisciplinary debate and continued research work have been what, beyond technology, is returning to us this valuable part of cultural memory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACEVES, Joseph (2015): El Pinar. Factores sociales relacionados con el desarrollo rural en un pueblo español, Madrid, CSIC.

AUGÉ, Marc (1998): Los «no lugares». Espacios del anonimato. Una antropología de la sobremodernidad, Barcelona, Gedisa.

BRANDES, Stanley (2017): Migración, parentesco y comunidad: tradición y cambio social en un pueblo castellano, Madrid, CSIC.

CARO BAROJA, Julio (1965): El Carnaval (Análisis histórico-cultural), Madrid: Taurus.

CHAUVIER, Éric (2011): Anthropologie de l’ordinaire. Une conversion du regard, Touluse, Editions Anacharsis.

CRUZ, Manuel (2005): Las malas pasadas del pasado. Identidad, responsabilidad, historia, Barcelona, Anagrama.

DÍAZ VIANA, Luis (2019): Los guardianes de la tradición y otras imposturas acerca de la cultura popular, Valladolid / Morelia, Páramo / UNAM.

GRAEBER, David (2018): Hacia una teoría antropológica del valor. La moneda falsa de nuestros sueños, Buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura.

KIRSHENBLATT-GIMBLETT, Barbara (2003): «Kodak Moments, Flashbulb Memories: Reflections on 9/11», en: <http://www.nyu.edu.classes/bkg/web> (22.02.06).

MARTÍ I PÉREZ, Josep (1990): «El folklorismo. Análisis de una tradición “prêt-à-porter”», Anuario Musical, 45, pp. 317-352.

PAZOS, Álvaro (2004): «Tiempo, memoria e identidad personal», Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares, LIX, pp. 189-202.

PLÁCIDO SUÁREZ, Domingo (2004): «El tiempo, la ciudad y la historia en la Grecia clásica», Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares, LIX, pp. 157-172.

RICOEUR, Paul (2002): «Definición de la memoria desde un punto de vista filosófico», en ¿Por qué recordar?, Academia Universal de las Culturas (ed.), Barcelona, Granica, pp. 24-28.

SAHLINS, Marshall (1983): «Other Times, Other Customs. The Anthropology of History», American Anthropologist, 85, pp. 517-544.

SAMPEDRO BLANCO, Víctor F. (2005): «Multitudes on Line», en Multitudes on Line, Víctor F. Sampedro Blanco (ed.), Madrid, Catarata, pp. 279-304.

TABUCCHI, Antonio (2004): Tristano muere, Barcelona, Editorial Anagrama.

THE AMERICAN FOLKLIFE CENTER (2004): La tradición popular y la investigación de campo: una introducción a las técnicas de investigación, Washington DC, Library of Congress.

TODOROV, Tzvetan (2000): Los abusos de la memoria, Barcelona, Paidós.

Published

2024-12-21

How to Cite

Díaz Gonzalez, L. (2024). Beyond the confines of orality: the value of memory in the recording of intangible cultural heritage. Boletín De Literatura Oral, 7 ext, e8978. https://doi.org/10.17561/blo.vextra7.8978