The friction line between “lying” and “truth”, Oedipal conflict, and traumatic speaking and silence in Pat Barker’s Regeneration

José M. Yebra

Abstract


The present article analyses the first part of Pat Barker’s trilogy Regeneration (1991-1995), of the same title. It is set in the First World War and turns around the encounter between psychiatrist E. M. Rivers and War poet Siegfried Sassoon when the latter suffers from shell shock and publishes a complaint against the war politics of the British government. From the analysis of Sassoon’s Declaration, my main contention is that the novel addresses the liminal territory between “truth” and “lying” when representing and memorialising a traumatic event like WWI. In the second part, I delve into the poetics of psychoanalysis and (poetic) language as the narratives Barker uses to articulate the rapport between generations: fathers furthering a war in which their sons are involved. With this in mind, the paper analyses their oedipal conflict, as well as that between healer (Rivers) and trauma victim (Sassoon) both at a personal and national level.


Keywords


“Lying”; “truth”; Oedipal conflict; WWI trauma

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arendt, Hannah. Crisis of the Republic. Harcourt Brace: New York, 1972.

Atkinson, Meera. “Transgenerational Trauma and Cyclical Haunting in Pat Barker’s Regeneration Trilogy.” Cultural Studies Review. 21.1. (2015): 58-75. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v21i1.3639

Barker, Pat. Regeneration. Penguin: London, 1991.

---. The Eye in the Door. Penguin: London, 1993.

---. The Ghost Road. Penguin: London, 1995.

Barrett, Michèle. “Pat Barker’s Regeneration Trilogy and the Freudianization of Shell Shock.” Contemporary Literature 53.2 (2012): 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1353/cli.2012.0016

Brannigan, John. Pat Barker. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.

Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge. 1990.

Caruth, Cathy. Ed. Trauma. Explorations in Memory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1995.

---. Literature in the Ashes of History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2013.

Derrida, Jacques. Positions. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1982.

Foucault, Michel. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.

Hollinghurst, Alan. The Stranger’s Child. London: Picador, 2011.

Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism. New York: Routledge, 1988. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358856

Joyes, Kaley. “Regenerating Wilfred Owen: Pat Barker's revisions.” Mosaic 42.3 (2009): 169–83.

Kendall, Tim. Poetry of the First World War. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2014.

Kirk, John. “Recovered Perspectives: Gender, Class, and Memory in Pat Barker’s Writing.” Contemporary Literature. 40.4 (1999): 603-626. https://doi.org/10.2307/1208796

LaCapra, Dominick. Writing History, Writing Trauma. Johns Hopkins UP, 2001.

Lifton, Robert Jay. The Broken Connection: On Death and the Continuity of Life. New York: Basic Books, 1979.

Luckhurst, Roger. The Trauma Question. London: Routledge, 2008. PMid:18850855

Monteith, Sharon. Critical Perspectives on Pat Barker. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2005. PMCid:PMC1325245

Shaddock, Jennifer. “Dreams of Melanesia: Masculinity and the Exorcism of War in Pat Barker’s The Ghost Road.” Modern Fiction Studies 52.3 (2006): 656-675. https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2006.0074

Sontag, Susan. AIDS and its Metaphors. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1989.

Steffens, Karolyn. “Communicating Trauma: Pat Barker’s Regeneration Trilogy and W. H. Rivers’s Psychoanalytic Method.” Journal of Modern Literature. 37. 3 (2014): 36-55.

https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.37.3.36

Winter, Jay. “Shell-Shock and the Cultural History of the Great War.” Journal of Contemporary History. 35.1 (2000): 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 002200940003500102

Wurtz, James F. “Representing the Great War: Violence, Memory, and Comic Form.” Pacific Coast Philology 44.2 (2009): 205-215.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17561/grove.v23.a13

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.