Psychosocial risks for educators during Ecuador’s conflict.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17561/ae.v27n1.9123

Keywords:

Psychosocial risk, welfare state, social psychology

Abstract

During the internal conflict in Ecuador in 2024, an extensive study investigated the psychosocial risks affecting professionals in the education sector. The DECORE questionnaire was used, demonstrating high internal consistency and adequate reliability for its application in the local context. An exploratory factor analysis confirmed a factorial structure aligned with the theoretical framework of Karasek and Theorell, reinforcing the conceptual validity of the study. The main findings revealed considerable variability in cognitive demands and low perceived autonomy in job control. Additionally, inadequate organisational support and perceptions of inequitable rewards were identified as key contributors to heightened psychosocial risk. Significant gender-based differences were observed, with female staff reporting greater vulnerability in the dimensions of control and cognitive demands. These outcomes highlight the urgent need to implement organisational strategies aimed at strengthening institutional support and promoting retributive justice. Such interventions are essential for mitigating psychosocial risks and promoting occupational well-being in educational environments during periods of severe societal disruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Aurora González Velásquez, Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador

    Coordinadora DECE.

References

Carrión Mena, F. (2023). El territorio unificado del crimen en el Ecuador. http://repositorio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/handle/10469/19923

Correal, A., & Glatsky, G. (2024, enero 10). Sentimientos encontrados’: División en Ecuador ante las medidas del gobierno para detener la violencia. The New York Times (Digital Edition), NA-NA.

Cuartas, Y. N. V., Machado, D. B., & Gómez, J. D. V. (2020). Polarización política, relaciones familiares y barreras psicosociales para la paz en Medellín—Colombia. Revista de Paz y Conflictos, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.30827/revpaz.v13i1.9529

Hernández - Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill.

Luceño Moreno, L., Martín García, J., Díaz Ramiro, E. M., & Rubio Valdehita, S. (2008). Un instrumento de evaluación de riesgos psicosociales en el entorno laboral: «el Cuestionario Decore». EduPsykhé: Revista de Psicología y Educación, 7(2), 131-153.

Magnano, P., Santisi, G., Platania, S., Zammitti, A., & Tous Pallares, J. (2020). The Italian version of the Work Psychosocial Climate Scale (Escala Clima Psicosocial en el Trabajo). Work, 66(4), 789-798. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203225

Martin-Aragon-Gelabert, M., & Terol-Cantero, M. C. (2020). Post-COVID-19 psychosocial intervention in healthcare professionals (Intervencion psicosocial postCOVID-19 en personal sanitario). International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 664-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1783854

Sierra Hernaiz, E. (2021). Delimitación del concepto de riesgo psicosocial en el trabajo. Foro: Revista de Derecho, 35, 7-26. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2021.35.1

Torresano, I. D. G., Villarreal, B. T. T., & Montenegro, B. C. P. (2021). Riesgos psicosociales y desempeño laboral de los funcionarios del Hospital Básico Píllaro y su dirección distrital. Revista Eruditus, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.35290/re.v2n1.2021.397

Published

2025-07-18

Issue

Section

Investigaciones

How to Cite

González Velásquez, A., & Delgado Togra, D. (2025). Psychosocial risks for educators during Ecuador’s conflict. AULA DE ENCUENTRO, 27(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.17561/ae.v27n1.9123