A critique of the white reason. Antonia Darder: the fearless roaring of a sublime freirean-neogramscian voice
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17561/ae.vextra1.7346Mots-clés :
subaltern, emancipatory democracy, curriculum epistemicides, itinerant curriculum theory, participatory educationRésumé
This article exfoliates Antonia Darder’s critical excavations on cultural democracy and schooling. The article unfolds her arguments in the context of our contemporary epoch, an epoch paced by an absurd. In doing so, the paper scrutinizes eugenics and the curriculum epistemicide as the real colors of such absurdity in our field. The paper situates such absurdity within the matrix of Modern Western Eurocentric reason – a Prosperous reason – and examinates its non-derivative abyssal nature. The article also unpacks Darder’s call to challenge such eugenic reason, through a commitment to decolonize our cultural forms, the very praxis of democracy as well as our educational institutions, educational policy, curriculum, and teacher preparation programs. The article flags categories such as race and language as quite dear to a Freirean scholar with a strong Neogramscian footprint such as Antonia Darder. The article ends by examining not only, how the notion of cultural democracy in schooling and pedagogies speaks volumes to what I have called itinerant educational and curriculum theories, but also how the piece is a clear call to some of the challenges we face within the critical and post critical territories.
Téléchargements
Références
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York, NY: New Left Books.
Amin, S. (2008). The World We Wish to See. Revolutionary Objectives in the Twenty-First Century. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Apple, M. & Weis, L. (1983). Ideology and the Practice of Schooling. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Artaud, A. (1958). The Theater and Its Double. New York, NY: Rove Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berardi, F. ‘Bifo’. (2012). The Uprising. On Poetry and Finance. Semiotext(e).
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racism Without Racists. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/202060
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749
Camus, A. (1957). Speech at the Nobel Award.
Camus, A. (2005). The Myth of Sisyphus. London: Penguin Books.
Cesaire, A. (2000). Discourse on Colonialism. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Cusset, F. (2008). French Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Darder, A. (2012). Culture and Power in the Classroom, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Paradigm.
Darder, A. (2016). Foreword. Ruthlessness and the forging of liberatory epistemologies: An arduous journey. In J. M. Paraskeva, Curriculum Epistemicides (pp. ix-xvi). New York, NY: Routledge.
Darder, A. (2022). Reflections on cultural democracy and schooling. Target article for the special issue on “Cultural Democracy and Social Justice in the Classroom”. Aula de Encuentro, special issue 1 (this issue) 39-89. https://doi.org/10.1756/ae.vextra1.7334
Darder, A. & Torres, R. D. (2004). After Race: Racism After Multiculturalism. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy? New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Dussel, E. (2013). Ethics of Liberation. In the Age of Globalization and Exclusion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1131d8k
Eagleton, T. (2004). The Illusions of Post-Modernism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-324. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250
Escobar, A. (2013). Words and knowledges otherwise: The Latin American modernity/coloniality research program. In W. Mignolo & A. Escobar (Eds.), Globalization and the Decolonial Option (pp. 33-64). New York, NY: Routledge.
Esslin, M. (1960). The theater of the absurd. The Tulane Drama Review, 4(4), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1124873
Fanon, F. (1967). Black Skins, White Masks. New York, NY: Grove Press.
Fanon, F. (2001). Wretched of the Earth. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press.
Gil, J. (2009). Em busca da identidade. O desnorte [In Search of Identity. The Bewilderment]. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água.
Giroux, H. (2011). Education and the Crisis of Public Values. New York, NY: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1557-8
Goody, J. (2006). The Theft of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gramsci, A. (1990). Selections from Prison Notebooks. New York, NY: International Publications.
Grosfoguel, R. (2011). Decolonizing post-colonial studies and paradigms of political economy: Transmodernity, decolonial thinking, and global coloniality. Transmodernity. Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/T411000004. Retrieved from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/21k6t3fq.
Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381181
Held, D. (1980). Introduction to Critical Theory. From Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520341272
Henry, P. (2000). Caliban’s Reason. Introducing Afro-Caribbean Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.
hooks, b. (2000). Where We Stand: Class Matters. New York, NY: Routledge.
Horkheimer, M. (1999). Critical Theory. New York, NY: Continuum.
Huebner, D. (1976). The moribund curriculum field: Its wake and our work. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(2), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1976.11075526
Innerarity, D. (2012). The Future and Its Enemies. In Defense of Political Hope. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Janson, E. (2020). The Pinocchio Effect. Rotterdam: Brill/Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004416048
Janson, E. & Paraskeva, J. M. (2015). Curriculum counter-strokes and strokes: Swimming in non-existent epistemological rivers. Policy Futures in Education, 13(8), 949-967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315579981
Jupp, J. (2017). Decolonizing and de-canonizing curriculum studies. The contribution of João M. Paraskeva works. Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1-25.
Kliebard, H. (1995). The Struggle for the American Curriculum. New York, NY: Routledge.
Macdonald, J. (1977). Values bases and issues for curriculum. In A. Molnar & A. Zahorik (Eds.), Curriculum Theory (pp. 10-21). Washington: ASCD (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2008). Against War: Views from the Underside of Modernity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smnhg
Marx, K. (1990). Capital – Volume 1. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
McCarthy, C. & Apple, M. (1988). Overview. Race, class, and gender in American educational research: Toward a nonsynchronous parallelist position. In L. Weis (Ed.), Class, Race, and Gender in American Education (pp. 3-39). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Memmi, A. (1965). The Colonizer and the Colonized. New York, NY: Orion Press.
Mignolo, W. (2008). The geopolitics of knowledge and colonial difference. In M. Morana, E. Dussel & C. Jáuregui (Eds.), Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate (pp. 225-258). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mignolo, W. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv125jqbw
Nkrumah, K. (1964). Consciencism. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Paraskeva, J. M. (2011). Conflicts in Curriculum Theory, 1st edition. New York, NY: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119628
Paraskeva, J. M. (2012). Challenging the neoliberal global minotaur. Policy Futures in Education, 10(6), 700-716. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.6.700
Paraskeva, J. M. (2013). The need of a higher education carnival. Policy Futures in Education, 11(5), 637-642. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.5.637
Paraskeva, J. M. (2016). Curriculum Epistemicides [Preface by Antonia Darder]. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734781
Paraskeva, J. M. (2017). Against the scandal: Itinerant theory as subaltern moment. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(2), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00004
Paraskeva, J. M. (2018). Towards a Just Curriculum Theory. The Epistemicide [Foreword by Noam Chomsky]. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146904
Paraskeva, J. M. (2021). Curriculum and the Generation of Utopia [Preface by Antonia Darder]. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025771-5
Paraskeva, J. M. (2022). Conflicts in Curriculum Theory, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77420-2
Pessoa, F. (2002). The Book of Disquiet. New York, NY: Penguin.
Phenix, P. (1964). The Realms of Meaning. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Popkewitz, T. (1976). Myths of social science in curriculum. The Educational Forum, 40(3), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131727609336466
Quijano, A. (1991). Colonialidad y modernidad/racionalidad. Perú Indígena, 29(1), 11-21.
Rancière, J. (2010). Chronicles of Consensual Times. New York, NY: Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350252073
Santos, B. de Sousa. (1999). Porque é tão difícil construir uma teoria crítica? [Why is it so difficult to build a critical theory?]. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociais, 54, Junho, 197-215.
Santos, B. de Sousa. (2005). Democratizing Democracy. London: Verso.
Santos, B. de Sousa. (2007). Another Knowledge Is Possible. London: Verso.
Santos, B. de Sousa. (2014). Epistemologies from the South. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Santos, B. de Sousa. (2018). The End of the Cognitive Empire. The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002000
Saramago, J. (1997). Blindness. London: The Harvill Press.
Schubert, W., Lopez Schubert, A. L., Thomas, T. P. & Caroll, W. (1980). Curriculum Books: The First Eighty Years. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2013). Linguistic Genocide. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Svampa, M. (2016). Debates latinoamericanos: indianismo, desarrollo, dependencia, populismo. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.
Thuram, L. (2021). Pensamento branco. Lisboa: Tinta Da China.
Tlostanova, M. & Mignolo, W. (2012). Learning to Unlearn. Decolonial Reflections from Eurasia and the Americas. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Walsh, C. (2012). ‘Other’ knowledges, ‘other’ critiques: Reflections on the politics and practices of philosophy and decoloniality in the ‘other’ America. Transmodernity. Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(3), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.5070/T413012880
Wark, M. (2021). Capital is Dead. Is This Something Worse? London: Verso.
Watkins, W. (1993). Black curriculum orientations. A preliminary inquiry. Harvard Educational Review, 63(3), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.63.3.26k2433r77v631k2
Zhao, W. (2019). China’s Education, Curriculum Knowledge, and Cultural Inscriptions. Dancing with the Wind. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315225845
Žižek, S. (2019). Living in the End Times. London: Verso.
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© João M Paraskeva 2022
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access) (en inglés).
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.
