Visual Intertextuality as a Backbone of Political Cartooning: Homogenous and Heterogeneous Visual Juxtaposition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.v31.8643Keywords:
intervisuality, cartooning, homogeneous, heterogeneous, Boris JohnsonAbstract
This paper delves into the intricate realm of the communicative role of intertextuality within political cartoons, examining the humorous effect of satire and irony in visual intertextuality, termed here as Intervisuality. The study discerns two contrasting categories: homogeneous, which is marked by the ‘supportive and co-thematic’ relations between Source Character (SC) and Target Character (TC), whilst heterogeneous, distinguished as ‘ironic and contrastive’ relation between SC and TC. For examining these categories within the cartooning discourse, a sample of UK cartoons related to the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, was selected particularly those visually inspired by historical characters. The results reveal that these intervisual references are either identified overtly when both characters are visually present or covertly when the SC is visually unobservable but inferred from related events, or paintings. Moreover, the results highlight that UK cartoonists prefer direct heterogeneous intervisuality in their works to highlight elements of hypocrisy and deception during Johnson’s tenure.
Downloads
References
Abu Dayyeh, Imad. “Intertextuality in the Analysis of Texts and Inter - Semiotic Translation”. Bethlehem University Journal, vol.10, 1991, pp.77-91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26444843
Agüero Guerra, Marta. Beyond verbal incongruity: A genre-specific model for the interpretation of humour in political cartoons, in Ruiz-Gurillo, L. (Ed.). Metapragmatics of Humour: Current Research Trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016, pp.57-77.
Allen, Graham. Intertextuality. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.
Alsadi, Wejdan & Martin Howard. Intertextuality: Allusion and parody in cartoons, in Alsadi, Wejdan & Howard, Martin. (Eds.). The Multimodal Rhetoric of Humour in Saudi Media Cartoons . Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2021, pp.44-70. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501509902-005
Barthes, Roland, Image Music Text. Trans. by Stephen Heath. London: Fontana Press, 1977. https://monoskop.org/images/0/0a/Barthes_Roland_Image-Music-Text.pdf
Bazerman, Charles. Intertextuality: How Texts Rely on Other Texts, in Bazerman, C. and Prior, P (Eds.). What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2004, pp. 83-96. https://bazerman.education.ucsb.edu/sites/default/files/docs/Bazerman2004ChapIntertextuality.pdf
Bloome, David & Ann Egan-Robertson. “The social construction of intertextuality and classroom reading and writing”. Reading Research Quarterly, vol, 28, no. 4, 1993, pp. 303-333.
Caple, Helen. Intermodal relations in image-nuclear news stories, in L. Unsworth (Ed.). Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education. London: Continuum, 2008, pp.125-138. .https://www.academia.edu/14689131/_2008_Intermodal_relations_in_image_nuclear_news_stories
Cook, Guy. The Discourse of Advertising. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2001.
Edwards, Janis. L. Political Cartoons in the 1988 Presidential Campaign: Image, Metaphor, and Narrative. New York: Garland, 1997.
El Refaie, Elizabeth. Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses, in Forceville. Charles & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. (Eds.). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: De Gruyter,2009, pp.173-196.
Fairclough, Norman. Media Discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic Publisher, 2011.
Forceville, Charles. & Natašavan de Laar. Metaphors portraying right-wing politician Geert Wilders in Dutch political cartoons, in Hidalgo-Tenorio, E., Benítez-Castro, M.-Á. & De Cesare, F. (Eds.). Populist Discourse: Critical Approaches to Contemporary Politics. London: Routledge, 2019, pp. 292-307.
Gimson, Andrew. Boris: The Rise of Boris Johnson. United Kingdom: Biteback Publishing, 2012.
Greenberg, Josh. “Framing and Temporality in Political Cartoons: A Critical Analysis of Visual News Discourse”. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, vol.39, no.2, 2002, pp. 181-219. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=googlescholar&id=GALE|A87720848&v=2.1&it=r&sid=AONE&asid=30ad84c5 Accessed on August13, 2023.
Hartley, John. Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge. 2002. https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Media_and_Free_Culture/Communication_Culture_and_Media_Studies-John_Hartley.pdf
“Boris was cartoon gold’: the UK’s top cartoonists on drawing Boris Johnson.” The Guardian. from 2022, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/31/boris-cartoon-gold-cartoonists-drawing-boris-johnson-best-chris-riddell-martin-rowson-ralph-steadman Retrieved on September 21, 2023
Hodges, Adam.‘Intertextuality in Discourse’, in Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi E., Schiffrin, Deborah (Eds).The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch2
Juvan, Marko. “Towards a History of Intertextuality in Literary and Culture Studies”. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, vol. 10, no.3, 2008, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1370
Kristeva, Julia. 'Word, Dialogue and Novel', in Moi, T. (Ed.) The Kristeva Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1986, pp. 35-61.
Kuipers, Giselinde. “Humour styles and symbolic boundaries”. Journal of Literary Theory. Vol. 3, no.2, 2009, pp. 219-240. https://doi.org/10.1515/JLT.2009.013
Lakoff, George. The contemporary theory of metaphor, in Ortony, A. (Ed.). Metaphor and thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 202-251.
Lakoff, George. & Mark Johnson. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980
Lakoff, Robin.T. “Laura! Laura! Wake up” The politics and pragmatics of intertextuality and appropriation, in Meeuwis, M. and Östman, J.O. (Eds.). Pragmaticizing Understanding: Studies for Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012, pp. 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.170.09lak
Lemke, J. L. “Intertextuality and Educational Research”. Linguistics and Education, vol.4, no. 3-4, 1992, pp. 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(92)90003-F
Long, Yi., & Gaofeng Yu. “Intertextuality Theory and Translation”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 10, no.9, 2020, pp.1106-1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1009.14
Mamboral, Nasrullah. New Criticism. Literary Theory and Criticism.2021, URL: https://literariness.org/2021/05/30/new-criticism/
Martínez Alfaro, Maria Jesús. Intertextuality: Origins and Development of the Concept. Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos, vol.18, no. 1-2, 1996, pp. 268-285. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=637582
Miola, Robert. Seven types of intertextuality. Chicago:Loyola University Chicago. 2004. https://loyolanotredamelib.org/Chaired/docs/SevenTypesIntextuality-04.pdf.Accessed on 13 October, 2023
Moya-Guijarro, Arsenio Jesús. “Semiotic metaphor in three children’s picture books”. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, vol. 38, no. 1, 2016, pp. 33-52.
Norrick, Nearl. R. “A frame-theoretical analysis of verbal humor: Bisociation as Schema conflict”. Semiotica: Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, vol.60, no. 3-4, 1986, pp. 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.60.3-4.225
Panigrahi, Debashish. & N. D. R Chandra. (2013). Intertextuality in Advertising. Language in India, vol. 13, No.9, 2013, pp. 251-264. http://www.languageinindia.com/sep2013/panigrahiintertextualityfinal1.pdf
Pinar-Sanz, María Jesús. Ethnic humour and political advertising, in Chovanec, Jan and Ermida, Isabel (Eds.). Language and Humour in the Media. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2012, pp. 211-230.
Pinar-Sanz,, María Jesús. Offence strategies in political cartoons, in Crespo-Fernández, E. (Ed.). Taboo in Discourse: Studies on Attenuation and Offence in Communication. Bern: Peter Lang, 2018, pp.127-150.
Pinar- Sanz, María Jesús. “Humour and intertextuality in Steve Bell’s political Cartoons”. The European Journal of Humour Research, vol. 8, no. 3, 2020, pp.16-39. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2020.8.3.Pinar-Sanz
Popa, Mihaela. “Ironic Metaphor Interpretation”. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 33, no. 1, Nov. 2011, https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6913.
Riffaterre, Michael. “Syllepsis.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 4, 1980, pp. 625–38. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343223. Accessed on 8 November, 2023.
Schilperoord, Joost, Mas Alfons & Ferdinandusse Heleen. “Perceptual and conceptual visual rhetoric: the case of symmetric object alignment”. Metaphor and Symbol, vol.24, no. 3, 2009, pp.155-173. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10926480903028110
Seymour-Ure, Colin. “What future for the British political cartoon?” Journalism Studies. Vol. 2, no.3, 2001, pp. 333-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700120062202
Stewart, Heather, & Elliott Larry. ‘Absolutely fanciful’: Boris Johnson’s new deal not Rooseveltian, say critics. The Guardian., 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/29/absolutely-fanciful-boris-johnsons-new-deal-not-rooseveltian-say-critics Accessed on 7 December 2023.
Thomas, Charlie. Style Steal: How to dress like Sir Winston Churchill, 2018. https://www.thegentlemansjournal.com/style-steal-dress-like-sir-winston-churchill/ accessed on 7 December 2023.
Tsakona, Villy. “Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humour”. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 41, no.6, 2009, pp. 1171-1188.
Tsakona, Villy. “Intertextuality and/in political jokes”. Lingua, vol. 203, 2018, pp.1-15.
Ungerer, Friedrich, & Hans-Jorg Schmid.. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Longman.2006. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835396
van Zoonen, Liesbet.. Intertextuality, in Rössler, P., Hoffner, C. and van Zoonen, L. (eds). The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. United State: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0219
Werner, Walt. “On Political Cartoons and Social Studies Textbooks: Visual Analogies, Intertextuality, and Cultural Memory”. Canadian Social Studies, vol.38, no.2, 2004. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1073912.pdf
Worton, Michael., & Judith Still. Intertextuality: Theories and Practices. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990.
Xie, Qin. “Analysis of Intertextuality in English News Headlines”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol.8, no.8, 2018, pp. 1010-1014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0808.13
Yus, Francisco. “Multimodal humour: The case of cartoons in the press”, in Yus, Francisco. (Ed.). Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016, pp.267-298. https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4
Zannini, Lorenzo. “Critical Perspectives on Intertextuality, Interdiscursivity and (Re)Contextualisation”. Transitions: Journal of Transient Migration, vol. 5, no.1, 2021, pp. 1-18. https://transitionspostgradjournal.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/critical-perspectives-on-intertextuality-interdiscursivity-and-recontextualisation_zannini2021.pdf
Zengin, Mevlüde. “An Introduction to Intertextuality as a Literary Theory: Definitions, Axioms and the Originators”. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, vol.25, no1, 2016, pp. 299-327. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/411869
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eman Alqaisi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Also, authors will retain the rights on their work, even if they will be granting The Grove. Working Papers on English Studies a non-exclusive right of use to reproduce, edit, distribute, publicly communicate and show their work. Therefore, authors are free to engage in additional, independent contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in this journal (such as uploading them to an institutional repository or publishing them in a book), as long as the fact that the manuscripts were first published in this journal is acknowledged.
