Sexual violence, seduction and ‘protection’ in fieldwork

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17561/rae.v25.10012

Keywords:

Sexual violence. Ethnography. Sexuality. Corporeality. Intersectionalities

Abstract

In this article, I focus on two questions related to sexual violence in anthropological research. The first, on the theoretical and pedagogical level, is how to prepare our students for the eventual possibility of this violence that, marked by the intersection between gender, sexuality, social class, nationality, race, religion, age, they can suffer while performing ethnographies. The second, of an ethical and epistemological order, is how reflection on the tensions between anthropological and feminist presuppositions contributes to confronting this issue. In response to the first question, I take as a reference my field experiences in the field of "sex tourism" and sex work, and those of the young researchers who studied in our graduate programs at the State University of Campinas, in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. I also consider my experience as a coordinator of feminist study groups and reflect on the preparation we offer our students for insertion in the field and how this does not avoid the feeling of guilt in the face of attempted rape during the realization of ethnographies. To reflect on the second question, I take into account anthropological codes of ethics and formulations on the relationship between the production of anthropological and feminist knowledge and the dialogue with anthropologists who have carried out collaborative anthropology and who have reflected on sexual violence in fieldwork.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu-Lughod, L. (2016). Ten questions about anthropology, feminism, Middle East politics, and publics.

https://americanethnologist.org/online-content/interviews/lila-abu-lughod-ten-questions-about-anthropology-feminism-middle-east-politics-and-publics/

Altork, K. (1995). Walking the fire line. En D. Kulick y M. Willson (Eds.), Taboo: Sex, identity and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork (pp. 107–139). Routledge.DOI 10.4324/9780203420379_chapter_4 jour-nals.sagepub.com+9ouci.dntb.gov.ua+9ouci.dntb.gov.ua+9

Bell, D., Caplan, P., & Karim, W. J. (1990). Gendered fields: Women, men and ethnography. Londres: Routledge.

Berry, M.; Chávez, C.; Cordis, S.; Ihmoud, S.; Velázquez. E. (2017). Toward a fugitive anthropology: Gender, race, and violence in the field. Cultural Anthropology, 32(4), 537–565. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca32.4.05

Bonetti, A.; Fleischer, S. (orgs.). (2007). Entre saias justas e jogos de cintura. Editora EDUN-ISC.cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl+9periodicos.ufpel.edu.br+9periodicos.ufpel.edu.br+9

Das, V. (2008). Violence, gender, and subjectivity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 283–299. DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094430

Das, V.; Poole, D. (2004). Anthropology in the margins of the state. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 30(1), 140–144. DOI:10.1525/pol.2007.30.1.140

Gearing, J. (1995). Fear and loving in the West Indies. En Kulick y Willson (Op.cit.), pp. 186–218).

Golde, P. (1986). Women in the field: Anthropological experiences. University of California Press.

Hall, M. (1994). Gender and economic interests in tourism prostitution: The nature, development and implications of sex tourism in South-East Asia. En: Theobald W.F. (Ed.), Global tourism (pp. 179–201). Heinemann.

Klob, S. T. (2017). Sexual(ized) harassment and ethnographic fieldwork: A silenced aspect of social research. Ethnog-raphy, 18(3), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138116641958

Koksis, J. (2024). Research, rigour and rape: Facing the reality of gender-based violence in academic fieldwork. Gen-der, Place & Culture. DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2024.2341262

Konrad, M. (Ed.). (2012). Collaborators collaborating: Counterparts in anthropological knowledge and international research relations. Berghahn Books.

Kulick, D.; Willson, M. (Eds.). (1995). Taboo: Sex, identity and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork. Routledge.

Maning, J. (2018). Becoming a decolonial feminist ethnographer: Addressing the complexities of positionality and representation. Management Learning, 49(3), 311–325. doi:10.1177/1350507617745275

Markowitz, F.; Aschkenazi, M. (1999). Sex, sexuality, and the anthropologist. University of Illinois Press.

Nascimento, S. de S. (2022). Epistemologias transfeministas negras: Perspectivas e desafios para mulheridades múl-tiplas. Estudos Históricos, 35(77), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2178-149420220311

Newton, E. (1993). My best informant's dress: The erotic equation in fieldwork. Cultural Anthropology, 8(1), 3–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/656419

Olivar, J. M.; Da Cunha, F. M.; Rosa, P. C. (2015). Presenças e mobilidades transfronteiriças entre Brasil, Peru e Colômbia: O caso da “migração peruana na Amazônia brasileira”. Revista Tomo. 26 https://doi.org/10.21669/tomo.v0i0.4405

Oyèwúní, O. (2021). A invenção das mulheres: Construindo um sentido africano para os discursos ocidentais de gêne-ro. Bazar do Tempo.

Padovani, N. C. (2017). Tráfico de mulheres nas portarias das prisões ou dispositivos de segurança e gênero nos processos de produção das “classes perigosas”. Cadernos Pagu, (51). https://doi.org/10.1590/18094449201700510003

Padovani, N. C. (2023). Sobre casos e casamentos: Afetos e amores através de penitenciárias femininas em São Paulo e Barcelona. EdUFSCar.

Passamani, G. R. (2025). O corpo e o sexo do antropólogo: Reflexões sobre desejo, prazer e limites éticos na pesquisa etnográfica. Horizontes Antropológicos, 31(72), e720401. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9983e7

Pasini, E. (2000). Corpos em evidência, pontos em ruas, mundos em pontos: A prostituição na região da Rua Augusta em São Paulo [Dissertação de mestrado, IFCH, Unicamp].

Pazzini, D. (2023). Conexiones haitianas en Tijuana: Mobilidad, interseccionalidad y fronteras en América Latina [Tesis de doctorado, IFCH, Unicamp].

Piscitelli, A. (2007). Shifting boundaries: Sex and money in the North-East of Brazil. Sexualities, 10(4), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460707080

Piscitelli, A. (2012). On ‘gringos’ and ‘natives’: Gender and sexuality in the context of international sex tourism in Fortaleza, Brazil.

Piscitelli, A. (2016). Erotics, love and violence: European women's travels in the northeast of Brazil. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(2), 274–287. DOI:10.1080/0966369X.2014.991697

Piscitelli, A. (en prensa). Expansões e tensões: Comentários sobre o campo dos estudos de gênero no Brasil. In A. P. V. Martins, C. Gomes, J. S. C. Oliveira, & M. Tamanini (Orgs.), Que diferença faz? Teorias feministas e estu-dos sobre mulheres e gênero na América Latina. Universidade Federal do Paraná.

Ribeiro, J. C. (2021). Fazer-se refugiada: Fronteiras, crises e (co)produção de diferenças na gestão do refúgio [Tese de doutorado, Universidade Estadual de Campinas].

Sharp, G.; Kremer, E. (2006). The safety dance: Confronting harassment, intimidation, and violence in the field. So-ciological Methodology, 36(1), 317–327. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00183.x

Schneider, L. T. (2020). Sexual violence during research: How the unpredictability of fieldwork and the right to risk collide with academic bureaucracy and expectations. Critique of Anthropology, 40(2), 173–193. DOI:10.1177/0308275X20917272

Strathern, M. (1988). The gender of the gift. New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-17

Issue

Section

Monograph: Ethnographic Violence

How to Cite

Piscitelli, A. (2025). Sexual violence, seduction and ‘protection’ in fieldwork. Antropología Experimental, 25, Texto 9: 117-129. https://doi.org/10.17561/rae.v25.10012