Jane Austen’s Concerns with Health and Moral Thoughts: The Dashwood Sisters and the Successful Regulation of Sense and Sensibility
According to Cartesian principles, in the seventeenth century the body was thought to be subordinated to the mind. Later in the eighteenth-century male authors of medical treatises supported the idea that the interaction of body and mind produced passion and could dangerously turn into mental breakdown. In all her novels Jane Austen showed an enormous interest in all matters concerning medical treatment. In Sense and Sensibility(1811), Austen emphasized illness and suffering by mixing physical health and mental disease with moral and philosophical doctrines. My contention in this article is that moralists, philosophers and thinkers such as Dr Johnson, William Blake, William Godwin, and Adam Smith collaborated with Austen to shape the idea that sensibility was no disease and sense no virtue; instead they propose that human beings, especially women, can obtain individual and collective profit and promote changes not only in the past but also in the present if they regulate their reason and feeling with a practical mindset.
Key words: physical health, mental breakdown, medicine, moral thoughts, regulation of feelings.
Austen, Jane. Sense and Sensibility. New York: Dover Thrift Editions, 1996.
Barker-Benfield, Graham John. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Burgess, Anthony. English Literature. Harlow: Longman, 1975.
Butler, Marilyn. Jane Austen and the War of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
Byrne, Paula. The Real Jane Austen. A Life in Small Things. London: Harper Press, 2013.
Downes, Daragh. “A Soemthing or a Nothing”: Towards a Sensibiliious Reading of Sense and Sensibility. Persuasions on line. 32. 2 (2012). Web. 12 Jul. 2018. http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-line/vol32no2/downes.html
Ferrante, Elena. “I was passionate about Austen’s anonymity.” The Guardian. 16 October 2015. Web. 12 Jul. 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/oct/16/sense-and- sensibility-jane-austen-elena- ferrante-anonymity
Gevirtz, Karen. Life after Death. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005.
Goodman, Lizbeth. Literature and Gender. Gender and Literature, London: Routledge, 1996.
Kaplan, Laurie and Richard Kaplan. “What is Wrong with Marianne? Medicine and Disease in Jane Austen’s England.” Persuasions on line. 30. 2 (1990). Web. 12 Jul. 2018. http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-line/vol30no2/kaplan.html
Kitson, Peter. “The Romantic Period, 1780-1832.” English Literature in Context. Paul Poplawski ed. Cambridge: CUP, 2008.
Knox-Shaw, Peter. Jane Austen and the Enlightenment. Cambridge: CUP, 2004.
Lau, Beth. “Optimism and Pessimism: Approaching Sense and Sensibility Through Cognitive Therapy.” Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal. 33 (2011): 40-52.
Neill, Edward. The Politics of Jane Austen. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1999.
Ogawa, Kimiyo. “Marianne’s Addiction: Amorous Pleasures in Sense and Sensibility,” Persuasions on line. 32. 2 (2012). Web. 12 Jul. 2018. http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-line/vol32no2/ogawa.html
Pellérdi, Marta. “Idleness and Melancholy in Sense and Sensibility.” Persuasions on line. 32. 2 (2012). Web. 12 Jul. 2018.
Perkins, Moreland. Reshaping the Sexes in Sense and Sensibility. Charlottesville: The University Press of Virginia, 1998.
Ryle, Gilbert. “Jane Austen and the Moralists.” Critical Essays on Jane Austen. B. C. Southam ed. London: Routledge, 1979.
Tanner, Tony. “Introduction” to Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility. New York: Penguin Books, 1982.
Todd, Janet. Sensibility: An Introduction. London: Methuen, 1986.
Watt, Ian. “On Sense and Sensibility.” A Truth Universally Acknowledged. 33 Great Writers on Why We Read Jane Austen. Susannah Carson ed. London: Random House, 2009.