A Study of Direct Speech Complementation with Embedding Verbs: Collostructional Analysis

Authors

  • Aroa Orrequia-Barea University of Jaén

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.v27.a6

Keywords:

collostructional analysis, complement subordination, corpus linguistics, direct speech, embedded complements, non-relational verbs

Abstract

Non-relational verbs, as opposed to relational ones, cannot replace their complement clause with a complex nominal, meaning that they do not denote a proposition, as the Relational Analysis states. However, direct speech seems to be a proper replacement for the complement clause in the non-relational verb cases. This paper deals with the analysis of some of the most representative taxonomies of embedding verbs using the British National Corpus, to check whether they can occur with direct speech complements; the collostructional analysis, which is a technique of statistical significance; and the programming language R to do it in a computational and automatic way. Thus, the collostructional method will measure the strength between the embedding verbs and their corresponding complement clauses in the direct speech form.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cattell, Ray. “On the Source of Interrogative Adverbs”. Language 54 (1978): 61–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412999

Flach, Susanne. Collostructions: An R implementation for the Family of Collostructional Methods, 2017. Package version v.0.1.0. Web. 15 Nov. 2020. <https://sfla.ch/collostructions/>

García Núñez, José María and Aroa Orrequia-Barea. “Non-relational Embedding Verbs: Quotes and Reports”. Complutense Journal of English Studies 28 (2020): 163–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.65989

Goldberg, Adele E. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Hooper, Joan. “On Assertive Predicates”. Syntax and Semantics 4 (1975): 91–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368828_005

Karttunen, Lauri. “Some Observations on Factivity”. Papers in Linguistics 4 (1971): 55–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351817109370248

Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky. “Fact”. Progress in Linguistics. Ed. Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Heidolph. The Hague: Mouton, 1970. 143–73.

Lakoff, George. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001

Moltmann, Friederike. “Propositional Attitudes without Propositions”. Synthese 135.1 (2003): 77–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022945009188

“Note.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, Sept. 2020. Web. 15 Sept. 2020. .

Orrequia-Barea, Aroa. La Semántica de los Verbos Proposicionales del Inglés Actual. Diss. University of Cádiz, 2017.

---. “La Relación entre la Discursividad y la No-Relacionalidad: Un Análisis Basado en Corpus”. Pragmalingüística 26 (2018): 246–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2018.i26.12

“Observe.” OED Online, Oxford University Press, Sept. 2020. Web. 15 Sept. 2020. .

Peters, Stanley. “Presuppositions and Conversation”. Texas Linguistic Forum 2 (1975): 122–33.

Pietroski, Paul. Events and Semantic Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244300.001.0001

Proost, Kristel. “Speech Act Verbs”. Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, Volume 2. Ed. Keith Brown. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006. 912–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01075-0

“Recall” OED Online, Oxford University Press, Sept. 2020. Web. 15 Sept. 2020. .

“Remember” OED Online, Oxford University Press, Sept. 2020. Web. 15 Sept. 2020. .

“Reveal” OED Online, Oxford University Press, Sept. 2020. Web. 15 Sept. 2020. .

Rosefeldt, Tobias. “That-Clauses and Non-Nominal Quantification”. Philosophical Studies 137 (2008): 301–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-0002-8

Schmid, Hans-Jörg and Helmut Küchenhoff. “Collostructional Analysis and other Ways of Measuring Lexicogrammatical Attraction. Theoretical Premises, Practical Problems and Cognitive Underpinnings”. Cognitive Linguistics 24.3 (2013): 532–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0018

Stalnaker, Robert. “Common Ground”. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2002): 701–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902

Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Stefan T. Gries. “Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8.2 (2003): 209–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste

The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition), 2007. Distributed by Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford, on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Web. 13 Nov. 2020. .

Downloads

Published

2020-12-14

How to Cite

Orrequia-Barea, A. (2020). A Study of Direct Speech Complementation with Embedding Verbs: Collostructional Analysis. The Grove - Working Papers on English Studies, 27, 83–102. https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.v27.a6