Election Day.
The Construction of Democracy through Technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17561/rae.v22.5793Abstract
An ethnographic analysis of the international community's efforts to democratize postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina argues for greater acknowledgement of the social within the technical aspects of politics. Rather than viewing elections as a ritual symbolically reflecting or producing meaning, the insights of Bruno Latour and other scholars of science are applied to elections as a site that creates democratic knowledge and authority. Technical practices and objects construct elections as an apolitical and acultural event. However, the forms of authority and social relations created through this apparently neutral techne are tremendously social and political. Democracy and elections are firmly embedded in social practices, knowledges, and artifacts.
Downloads
References
Abélès, Marc (1988). Modem Political Ritual: Ethnography of an Inauguration and a Pilgrimage by President Mitterrand. Current Anthropology (29);391-399. https://doi.org/10.1086/203651
Apter, Andrew H. (1992). Black Critics and Kings: The Hermeneutics of Power in Yoruba Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barry, Andrew (2002). The Anti-Political Economy. Economy and Society. 31(2): 268-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123162
Barry, Andrew, and Don Slater. (2002). Introduction: The Technological Economy. Economy and Society. 31(2): 175-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123117
Bell, Catherine M. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bellah, Robert (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Caldeira, Teresa P. R., and James Holston (1999). Democracy and Violence in Brazil. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 41(4): 691-729. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417599003102
Callon, Michel (1998). The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
Callon, Michel, Arie Rip, and John Law (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2
Campbell, David (1998). National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chandler, David (1999). Bosnia: Faking Democracy after Dayton. London: Pluto Press
Coles, Kimberley A. (2003). The Object of Elections: International Workers, Electoral Practices, and Government of Democracy in Post-War Bosnia-Herzegovina. Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Irvine.
Comaroff, Jean, and John L. Comaroff (1993). Modernity and its Malcontents: Ritual and Power in Postcolonial Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Elkit, Jorgen, and Palle Svensson (1997). What Makes Elections Free and Fair? Journal of Democracy 8(3): 32-61. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1997.0041
Ferguson, James (1994 [1990]). The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development, " Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gowa, Joanne S. (1999). Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hayden, Robert M. (1999a). Blueprints for a House Divided: The Constitutional Logic of the Yugoslav Conflicts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.15543
Hayden, Robert M. (1999b). Humanitarian Hypocrisy. Eastern European Constitutional Review 8(2). Elec-tronic document, http: //www. law. nyu. edu/eecr/vol8num3/feature/hypocrisy. html, accessed February 2001.
Hayden, Robert M. (2002). Democracy-Dictatorships of Virtue? States, NGOs, and the Imposition of Democratic Values. Harvard International Review 24(2): 56-62.
Holston, James, and Teresa P. R. Caldeira (1998). Democracy, Law, and Violence: Disjunctions of Brazilian Citizenship. In Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America. Felipe Agiiero and Jeffrey Stark, eds. Pp. 263-298. Boulder: Lynne Rienne Press.
Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (2002). Voter turnout from 1945 to Date: Compulsory Voting. Electronic document, http: //www. idea. int/vt/analysis/Compulsory_Voting. cfm, accessed September, 4, 2004.
International Committee of Red Cross (1997). The Silent Menace: Landmines in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.
International Crisis Group (1996). Elections in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Sarajevo: International Crisis Group.
Kertzer, David I. (1988). Ritual, Politics, and Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kertzer, David I. (1996). Politics and Symbols: The Italian Communist Party and the Fall of Communism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Latour, Bruno (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. (1986 [1979]). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820412
Law, John, and John Hassard (1999). Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
Markoff, John (1999). Where and When Was Democracy Invented? Comparative Studies in Society History 41(4): 660-690. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417599003096
McLeod, James R. (1999). The Sociodrama of Presidential Politics: Rhetoric, Ritual, And Power in the Era of Teledemocracy. American Anthropologist. 101(2): 359-379. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.2.359
Moore, Sally Falk, and Barbara G. Myerhoff (1977). Secular Ritual. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
Mozaffar, Shaheen, and Andreas Schedler (2002). Introduction: The Comparative Study of Electoral Governance. Special International Political Science Review 23(1): 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512102023001001
Newberg, Paula R., and Thomas Carothers (1996). Aiding-And Defining-Democracy. World Policy Journal 13(1): 97-108.
Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe (1997). Polling and Counting Manual: Republika Srpska National Assembly Election. Sarajevo: OSCE.
Ottaway, Marina (2002). The Post-War "Democratic Reconstruction Model": Why It Can't Work. Paper presented at United States Institute of Peace, June 18.
Paley, Julia (2002). Toward an Anthropology of Democracy. The Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 469-496. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085453
Pandolfi, Mariella (2002). Security and Pleasure: De-Politicizing, De-Totalizing, Re-Naturalizing Biopower. Paper presented at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, November 21.
Pandolfi, Mariella (2003). Contract of Mutual (In)Difference: Governance and Humanitarian Apparatus Albania and Kosovo. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10(1): 369-381. https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2003.10.1.369
Pastor, Robert A. (1998). Mediating Elections. Journal of Democracy 9(1): 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1998.0015
Rabinow, Paul (1999). French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226221922.001.0001
Rapp, Rayna (1999). Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
Ray, James Lee (1997). The Democratic Path to Peace. Journal of Democracy. 8(2): 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1997.0031
Schmitter, Philippe C., and Terry Lynn Karl (1991). What Democracy Is . . . and Is Not. Journal of Democracy. 2(3): 75-88.
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1947). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0033
United Nations Development Programme (1998). Human Development Report, Bosnia and Herzegovina 1998. Sarajevo: United Nations Development Programme. https://doi.org/10.18356/bc57a94d-en
Yablon, Charles M. (1992). Forms. In Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. Drucilla Cornell, Rosen-feld, and David Gray Carlson, eds. Pp. 258-262. New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kimberley A. Coles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Responsabilidad de los autores: son responsables por las ideas y datos empíricos de los manuscritos, por la fidelidad de la información, por la corrección de las citas, por los derechos para publicar cualquier material incluido en el texto y por la presentación del manuscrito en el formato requerido por la Revista de Antropología Experimental. Un manuscrito enviado a la Revista de Antropología Experimental no debe estar publicado ni haber sido presentado en la misma forma a otro medio de publicación. Así, mismo, los autores reconocen que conocen y están de acuerdos con estas PAUTAS EDITORIALES Y FORMALES. La dirección de la Revista de Antropología Experimental está permanentemente abierta para aclarar cualquiera de los contenidos aquí citados u de cualquier otra índole que surjan en el proceso de publicación de los manuscritos.
