The Theoretical Foundations of Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings: From Classical Theories to Modern Charters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17561/rtc.29.9524Keywords:
Adaptative Reuse, Conservation, Restoration, Athens Charter, Historic BuildingAbstract
The concept of adaptive reuse of historic buildings has become a key topic in cultural heritage conservation in recent decades. Originating from postmodern architectural movements, this approach is closely linked to sustainability, energy management, and functional adaptability. In many developed and developing countries, increased awareness of cultural and environmental values has highlighted this approach as a means to preserve historical identity while addressing contemporary needs. This article analyses the theoretical and philosophical foundations of adaptive reuse through a review of library and archival sources. It examines the thoughts of key figures in 19th-century conservation and restoration, such as Eugène Viollet-le-Duc and John Ruskin, who presented two different yet influential approaches in shaping building conservation principles. Their theories on authenticity, reconstruction, and historical continuity are explored, and their impact on contemporary conservation doctrines is assessed. Additionally, the study analyses key charters like the Athens Charter (1931) and the Venice Charter (1964), examining how conservation principles have evolved in response to modern challenges, including social transformations, industrialization, and environmental requirements. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive perspective on the theoretical foundations of conservation and adaptive reuse, serving as a reference for developing sustainable strategies in adapting the use of historic buildings.
Downloads
References
Akagawa, N. (2016). Rethinking the global heritage discourse – overcoming ‘East’ and ‘West’? International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2015.1068213
Ardabilchi, I., Haghir, S., Mazaherian, H., & Khaghani, S. (2024). Studying Documents of International Organizations on Design Approaches in Historical Districts in the Contemporary era. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 14(1), 66-89. http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-69270-fa.html
Boito, C. (1893). Questioni pratiche di belle arti: Restauri, concorsi, legislazione, professione, insegnamento. G.B. Paravia. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=73cVAQAAIAAJ
Boito, C., & Birignani, C. (2009). Restoration in architecture: first dialogue. Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation History, Theory, and Criticism, 6(1), 68-83. https://doi.org/10.1353/fta.0.0026
Bordes, P. (2013). Destruction, Conservation and Creation during the French Revolution: A Matter of Style. Memoria y significado: uso y recepción de los vestigios del pasado, 107-124.
Brandi, C. (1977). Teoria del restauro. G. Einaudi. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=SxlMnQEACAAJ
Buckley, K., & Fayad, S. (2017). The HUL and the Australian Burra Charter - some implications for local heritage practices [Journal Article]. Historic Environment, 29(2), 46-57. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.293965145576084 https://search.informit.org/doi/full/10.3316/ielapa.293965145576084
Ciatti, M. (2017). Twentieth-century Italian conservators and conservation theory. The Burlington Magazine, 159(1375), 812-819. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44870095
Clary-Lemon, J. (2014). Archival Research Processes: A Case for Material Methods. Rhetoric Review, 33(4), 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2014.946871
Cocola-Gant, A. (2019). Tourism, simulacra and architectural reconstruction: selling an idealised past. In Tourism Fictions, Simulacra and Virtualities (pp. 122-136). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429278952-7
Croker, J. W. (1857). Essays on the early period of the French revolution. John Murray.
Crysler, C., Cairns, S., & Heynen, H. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of Architectural Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201756
Das, R., Jain, K. K., & Mishra, S. K. (2018). Archival research: A neglected method in organization studies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2016-0123
Djabarouti, J. (2022). Imitation and intangibility: postmodern perspectives on restoration and authenticity at the Hill House Box, Scotland. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.1883716
Donovan, A. E. (2007). William Morris and the Society for the protection of ancient buildings. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937907
Fejérdy, T. (2014). Cultural Heritage as a Basis for Resilience a Reserve for the Regeneration of Historical Cities. WORKING PAPERS IN SOCIAL AND EUROPEAN STUDIES, 5, 1-7.
Hanachi, P., & Fadaei Nezhad, S. (2011). A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Conservation and Regeneration in Historic Urban Areas. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 3(46), 15-26. https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_25057_e8684204648378134d174d3adf458750.pdf
Hannabuss, S. (1999). Postmodernism and the heritage experience. Library Management, 20(5), 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435129910276280
Hansar, L. (2008). The lacuna, an empty space in urban construction. Cesare Brandi’s Restoration Theory in the integral preservation of old town areas. PLACE and LOCATION: Studies in Environmental Aesthetics and Semiotics VI. Eds. Eva Näripea, Virve Sarapik, Jaak Tomberg. Tallinn, Estonian Literary Museum, 139-151.
Hassard, F. (2008). Intangible heritage in the United Kingdom: the dark side of enlightenment? In Intangible heritage (pp. 284-302). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884973-21
Hooshyari, M. (2023). The Iranian approach to architectural restoration: a style derived from nationalism. Journal of the Institute of Conservation, 46(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2022.2157852
Jencks, C. (1991). The language of post-modern architecture (6th ed.). Rizzoli.
Jokilehto, J. (2009). The complexity of authenticity. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi, 18(03+ 04), 125-135.
Kahl, D. (2008). Robert Venturi and His Contributions to Postmodern Architecture.
Matero, F. G. (2007). Loss, compensation, and authenticity: the contribution of Cesare Brandi to architectural conservation in America. Future Anterior, 4(1), 45-58.
Morgan, D. (2012). Postmodernism and architecture. In The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism (pp. 119-130). Routledge.
Murphy, K. D. (1999). Memory and modernity: Viollet-le-Duc at Vézelay. Penn State Press.
Nasser, N. (2003). Cultural Continuity and Meaning of Place: Sustaining Historic Cities of the Islamicate World. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 9(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2003.10785336
Petzet, M. (2004). Principles of preservation: An introduction to the International Charters for Conservation and Restoration 40 years after the Venice Charter.
Plevoets, B., & Cleempoel, K. V. (2019). Adaptive reuse of the built heritage : concepts and cases of an emerging discipline. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161440
Ruskin, J. (1849). The seven lamps of architecture. J. Wiley.
Ruskin, J. (1867). The stones of Venice.-3 vol (Vol. 11). J. Wiley & Son. https://doi.org/10.2307/20646641
Scott, W., Rosenberg, F. H., & Boito, C. (1888). The Basilica of S. Mark in Venice. F. Ongania.
Stammers, T. (2019). The homeless heritage of the French Revolution, c.1789–1889. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(5), 478-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1431688
Staniforth, S. (2013). Historical Perspectives on Preventive Conservation. Getty Conservation Institute. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=t35yp4G8E2gC
Vaccaro, A. (1996). Restoration and anti-restoration. Historical and Philisophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage, 308-313.
Venturi, R., Scott Brown, D., Arnell, P., Bickford, T., & Bergart, C. (1984). A view from the Campidoglio: selected essays, 1953-1984.
Venturi, R., Scott Brown, D., & Izenour, S. (2017). Learning from Las Vegas (Facsimile edition. ed.) [still image]. The MIT Press.
Viñas, S. M. (2010). Minimal intervention revisited. In Conservation (pp. 47-59). Routledge.
Viollet-le-Duc, E.-E. (1875). On restoration. Sampson Low, Marston Low, and Searle.
Wong, L., & Berger, M. (2021). Interventions and Adaptive Reuse: A Decade of Responsible Practice. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=dRdozgEACAAJ https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035625035
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Moghaddasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this magazine, accept the following terms:
The authors will retain their copyright and will guarantee to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows third parties to share the work whenever their author is indicated and its first publication is this journal.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (eg to be deposited in an institutional telematic file or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication is indicated in this journal .
Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work via the Internet (eg in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase the number of citations of the published work..
In case of being accepted works will be published under Creative Commons license.
