Gendering Madness and Doubling Disability in Jane Eyre

Authors

  • Sunanda Sinha University of Delhi, Delhi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.28.6627

Keywords:

Desire, madness, impaired mind, gender representation, objectification, disability

Abstract

Jane Eyre has a well-designed structure of a bildungsroman that focuses on the pursuit of Jane’s desire and ignores the same for Bertha. The conceptual structure conveys a linear discourse to determine a prefixed understanding of Bertha, Jane, and Rochester. In Bertha’s context, the bildungsroman operates to deliver issues of race, gender, and disability in an existential quest to ascertain and establish her madness. There is a well-designed structural correspondence of bildungsroman, interplay of dark and light binary, the desire of Jane against the asexual Bertha, and the metaphor of fire in mapping the doubling. The literary devices serve as a dominant metaphorical barrier to normalcy in Thornfield. The paper considers this authorial viewpoint on Bertha’s sickness as a construct of a parallel gendered and a more potent conceptualisation of madness. In problematising madness, the paper argues a cultural narrative of representation that is affected by the impaired mind of Bertha. It will interrogate how the narrative systematically forges a doubling within which she is objectified, influenced, muted, bounded and characteristically disabled. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sunanda Sinha, University of Delhi, Delhi

Dr. Sunanda Sinha is an Associate Professor in the Department of English, Satyawati College, University of
Delhi, Delhi. Her areas of interest include Modern European Drama, Nineteenth Century European Realism, and Modernism. She has published articles in National and International journals on wide topics ranging from Modern Indian English Poetry, Kabir, Tehmina Durrani, Modern European Drama, Ngugi wa Thiong’o, etc. In her thirteen plus years in academics, she has worked as Teacher in charge of English Department, in charge of Army Girls Wing of NCC and Nodal Officer Twitter. In the capacity of Convener of Dramatics and Debating society, she has also staged/organised Plays and National debates respectively.

References

Ablow, Rachel. The Marriage of Minds: Reading Sympathy in the Victorian Marriage Plot. Stanford UP, 2007.

Azim, Firdous. The Colonial Rise of the Novel. Routledge, 1993.

Berlant, Lauren Gail. Compassion: The Culture and Politics of an Emotion. Routledge, 2004.

Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. 1847. Ed. Novy Kapadia. Worldview Publications, 2016.

Chow, Rey. “When Whiteness Feminizes: Some Consequences of a Supplementary Logic.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, 1999, pp. 137-68. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-11-3-137

Cixous, Helene, Keith Cohen, and Paula Cohen. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 1, no. 4, 1976, pp. 875-93. https://doi.org/10.1086/493306

Donaldson, Laura E. “The Miranda Complex: Colonialism and the Question of Feminist Reading.” Diacritics vol. 18, no. 2, 1988, pp. 65-77. https://doi.org/10.2307/465255

Fine M., & A. Ash. “Disability Beyond Stigma: Social Interaction, Discrimination, and Activism.” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 44, no. 11, 1988, pp. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1988.tb02045.x

Gilbert Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale UP, 1979.

Mao, Douglas. “The Labor Theory of Beauty: Aesthetic Justice, Blind Justice.” Aesthetic Subjects. Eds. Pamela R. Matthews and David McWhirter. University of Minnesota Press, 2003, pp. 190-229. Pizzo, Justine. Charlotte Brontë, Embodiment and the Material World. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34855-7 Punter, David, and Glennis Byron. The Gothic. Blackwell Publishing, 2004.

Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own. Princeton UP, 1977. Smyth, Donna E. Metaphors of Madness: Women and Mental Illness. Mount Saint Vincent University, 6 Aug. 2012, https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/download/4762/3992/6205 Accessed 10 Dec. 2021.

Spivak, Gayatri. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Harvard UP, 1999. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf541

Warhol, Robyn. “Double Gender, Double Genre in Jane Eyre and Villette.” SEL, vol. 36, no. 4, 1996, pp. 857-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/450979

Williams, Judith. Perceptions and Expressions in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë. University of Rochester Press, 1988.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-23

How to Cite

Sinha, S. . (2021). Gendering Madness and Doubling Disability in Jane Eyre. The Grove - Working Papers on English Studies, 28, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.28.6627