La locura de género y la duplicación de la discapacidad en Jane Eyre
Palabras clave:
Desire, madness, impaired mind, gender representation, objectification, disabilityResumen
Jane Eyre tiene una estructura bien diseñada de un bildungsroman que se centra en la búsqueda del deseo de Jane e ignora lo mismo para Bertha. La estructura conceptual transmite un discurso lineal para determinar una comprensión prefijada de Bertha, Jane y Rochester. En el caso de Bertha, la narración sólo se aleja de su "ser" para acercarse a su creciente locura. Su condición mental carece de una comprensión más profunda, sin embargo, se utiliza como un todo, y la mirada la explora en un continuo, en una serie de ignorantes pero dominantes barreras metafóricas a la normalidad en Thornfield. El artículo considera este punto de vista del autor sobre la enfermedad de Bertha como una construcción de un género paralelo y una conceptualización más potente de la locura. Al problematizar la locura, el artículo argumenta una narrativa cultural de representación que se ve afectada por una mente deteriorada de Bertha. Se cuestiona cómo la narrativa forja sistemáticamente una duplicación dentro de la cual ella es objetivada, influenciada, silenciada, limitada y característicamente discapacitada.
Palabras clave: Deseo; locura; impedido; género; objetivado; discapacitado.
Descargas
Referencias
Ablow, Rachel. The Marriage of Minds: Reading Sympathy in the Victorian Marriage Plot. Stanford UP, 2007.
Azim, Firdous. The Colonial Rise of the Novel. Routledge, 1993.
Berlant, Lauren Gail. Compassion: The Culture and Politics of an Emotion. Routledge, 2004.
Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. 1847. Ed. Novy Kapadia. Worldview Publications, 2016.
Chow, Rey. “When Whiteness Feminizes: Some Consequences of a Supplementary Logic.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, 1999, pp. 137-68. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-11-3-137
Cixous, Helene, Keith Cohen, and Paula Cohen. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 1, no. 4, 1976, pp. 875-93. https://doi.org/10.1086/493306
Donaldson, Laura E. “The Miranda Complex: Colonialism and the Question of Feminist Reading.” Diacritics vol. 18, no. 2, 1988, pp. 65-77. https://doi.org/10.2307/465255
Fine M., & A. Ash. “Disability Beyond Stigma: Social Interaction, Discrimination, and Activism.” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 44, no. 11, 1988, pp. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1988.tb02045.x
Gilbert Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale UP, 1979.
Mao, Douglas. “The Labor Theory of Beauty: Aesthetic Justice, Blind Justice.” Aesthetic Subjects. Eds. Pamela R. Matthews and David McWhirter. University of Minnesota Press, 2003, pp. 190-229. Pizzo, Justine. Charlotte Brontë, Embodiment and the Material World. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34855-7 Punter, David, and Glennis Byron. The Gothic. Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own. Princeton UP, 1977. Smyth, Donna E. Metaphors of Madness: Women and Mental Illness. Mount Saint Vincent University, 6 Aug. 2012, https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/download/4762/3992/6205 Accessed 10 Dec. 2021.
Spivak, Gayatri. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Harvard UP, 1999. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf541
Warhol, Robyn. “Double Gender, Double Genre in Jane Eyre and Villette.” SEL, vol. 36, no. 4, 1996, pp. 857-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/450979
Williams, Judith. Perceptions and Expressions in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë. University of Rochester Press, 1988.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Sunanda Sinha

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Also, authors will retain the rights on their work, even if they will be granting The Grove. Working Papers on English Studies a non-exclusive right of use to reproduce, edit, distribute, publicly communicate and show their work. Therefore, authors are free to engage in additional, independent contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in this journal (such as uploading them to an institutional repository or publishing them in a book), as long as the fact that the manuscripts were first published in this journal is acknowledged.


















