Thematic analysis of research, development and innovation within business management and business administration from 2015 to 2019
Keywords:
Business Management, Business Administration, Research and Development, Innovation, Competitive Intelligence, Strategic IntelligenceAbstract
Business Management, like other organizational areas, is constantly evolving, motivated by scientific-technological changes and business dynamics. Currently, we find that organizations face increasingly complex and changing scenarios that require the intensive use of data, information, and knowledge in all their processes, especially those that have to do with strategic activities such as Research processes, Development and Innovation. For organizations, this entails the design, development, deployment, and maintenance of advanced management models, ensuring competitiveness locally, regionally, and internationally. Hence, the present study analyzes the management of Research, Development, and Innovation from the perspective of Business Management within Organizations, through the use of bibliometric techniques and tools, such as SciMAT scientific maps. For this, all the available documents between 2015 and 2019 that are related to these areas, were collected from the Scopus database, in order to identify the main topics and their evolution, as the most productive authors, organizations, countries, and sources. Finally, this analysis establishes a reference framework allowing organizations to increase their competitiveness through a methodology of continuous improvement of Research, Development, and Innovation in Business Management.
Downloads
References
Ale Ebrahim, Nader, Hadi Salehi, Mohamed Amin Embi, Farid Habibi, Hossein Gholizadeh, y Seyed Mohammad Motahar. (2014). ‘Visibility and citation impact', International Education Studies, 7: 5. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n4p120
Alonso, Sergio, Francisco Javier Cabrerizo, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, y Francisco Herrera. (2009). ‘h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields’, Journal of Informetrics, 3: 273–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001
Araújo-Ruiz, Juan A., y Ricardo Arencibia Jorge. (2002). ‘Informetría, bibliometría y cienciometría: aspectos teórico-prácticos’, ACIMED.
Becerra-Rodriguez, Fredy, Hector Mauricio Serna Gomez, y Julia Clemencia Naranjo Valencia. (2013). ‘Redes empresariales locales, investigación y desarrollo e innovación en la empresa. Cluster de herramientas de Caldas, Colombia’, Estudios Gerenciales: 247–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.05.013
Cabeza-Ramírez, L Javier, Sandra Ma Sánchez Cañizares, y Fernando J Fuentes-García. (2018). ‘Characterisation of the classics of entrepreneurship (1968-2016). An analysis based on Web of Science’, Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 41: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.2.1488
Callon, M., J. P. Courtial, y F. Laville. (1991). ‘Co-Word Analysis as a Tool for Describing the Network of Interactions between Basic and Technological Research - The Case of Polymer Chemistry’, Scientometrics, 22: 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
Cantos-Mateos, Gisela, María de los Ángeles Zulueta-García, Benjamín Vargas-Quesada, y Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez. (2013). "Estudio comparativo sobre la visualización de redes de co-words a través de los descriptores del Science Citation Index y de Medline." In I Congresso ISKO Espanha e Portugal/XI Congresso ISKO Espanha.
Cobo, M. J., A. G. Lopez-Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, y F. Herrera. (2011). ‘Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62: 1382–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Cuartas, Gabriel Vélez, Henry Gómez Flórez, Ana Úsuga Ciro, y Manuel Vélez Trujillo. (2014). ‘Diversidad y reconocimiento de la producción académica en los sistemas de evaluación de la investigación en Colombia’, Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 37: 5. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.3.1133
González-Valiente, Carlos L. (2016). ‘Investigación sobre Bibliotecología, Ciencia de la Información, e Inteligencia Empresarial, a través de las presentaciones a los congresos INFO e IntEmpres: un análisis bibliométrico (2002-2012)’, Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 39. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.4.1377
He, Q. (1999). ‘Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis’, Library Trends, 48: 133–59.
Hernandez-Palma, Hugo Gaspar. (2011). ‘La Gestion Empresarial, un enfoque del siglo XX, desde las teorias administrativas cientifica, funcional, burocratica y de relaciones humanas’, Escenarios: 38–51.
Hirsch, Jorge E. (2005). ‘An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output’, Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 16569–72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Lagar Barbosa, María Pilar, María Isabel Escalona Fernández, y Antonio Pulgarín Guerrero. (2014). ‘Análisis de la interdisciplinariedad en la ingeniería química universitaria española’, Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica, 37: 9. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.1.1048
Liu, Zhigao, Yimei Yin, Weidong Liu, y Michael Dunford. (2015). ‘Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis’, Scientometrics, 103: 135–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y
López-Robles, J. R., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., Gómez, I. P., y Cobo, M. J. . (2019). ‘30 years of intelligence models in management and business: A bibliometric review’, International journal of information management, 48: 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.013
López-Robles, J. R., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., Porto-Gomez, I., Gamboa-Rosales, H., y Gamboa-Rosales, N. K. (2020). ‘Understanding the intellectual structure and evolution of Competitive Intelligence: A bibliometric analysis from 1984 to 2017’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5: 604–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1686136
Martínez, M. A., M. J. Cobo, M. Herrera, y E. Herrera-Viedma. (2015). ‘Analyzing the Scientific Evolution of Social Work Using Science Mapping’, Research on Social Work Practice, 25: 257–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514522101
Martínez, Miguel Angel, Manuel Herrera, Javier López-Gijón, y Enrique Herrera-Viedma. (2014). ‘H-Classics: Characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index’, Scientometrics, 98: 1971–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1155-9
Schreiber, Martin. (2007). ‘Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index’, EPL (Europhysics Letters), 78: 30002. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/78/30002
Schubert, András. (2007). ‘Successive h-indices’, Scientometrics, 70: 201–05. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0112-x
Sekaran, Uma, y Roger Bougie. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach (Wiley: Chichester, West Sussex, UK.).
Sternitzke, C., y I. Bergmann. (2009). ‘Similarity measures for document mapping: A comparative study on the level of an individual scientist’, Scientometrics, 78: 113–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1961-z
Wang, J. (2013). ‘Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation’, Scientometrics, 94: 851–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9
Zhao, Dangzhi, y Andreas Strotmann. (2015). ‘Analysis and visualization of citation networks’, Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services, 7: 1–207. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00624ED1V01Y201501ICR039
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Universidad de Jaén
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors maintain the copyright, but they guarantee the journal its right for publication, that is under Creative Commons Licence, permitting others share the work, whereas clearly indicating the author and the first publication of the journal.
- Authors could adopt non-exclusive licence agreements for delivering the published version, whereas clearly indicating the first publishing in Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Second Era.
- Authors are encouraged to spread their works through Internet before and during the sending process, in order to make interesting scientific discussions that could increase the cites of the published work (Open Citation Project).
Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Second Era, uses PKP Preservation Network (PN).
